<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: autoexec</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=autoexec</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 20:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=autoexec" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Switzerland wil have a referendum to cap population at 10M"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Leaving those climate refugees where they are wouldn't mean they were poor, it would mean they were dead. There are all kinds of irrational extreme positions that would maximize environmental protection. Certainly the best thing we could do for the environment would be to kill ourselves off, but very few people would argue for that. Instead it's better to go for something more balanced and limiting the number of people coming in your country to an amount the land can sustainably support seems pretty reasonable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:17:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48462238</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48462238</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48462238</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Surveillance is not safety: A statement on the UK's latest threat to privacy [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>  You're complaining about an optional back-up service. No data is being "collected,"<p>Every app offering cloud-based backup is in fact designed to "collect and store" sensitive data. That at least is opt in. The app also collects your name, photo, phone number and worst of all a list of your contacts and permanently keeps that in the cloud and there is zero way to opt out of that data collection. No matter what excuses you want to make for them there is no getting around the fact that the device does collect and store sensitive data. Just like it can't be denied that they've added several new features none of which is reflected in their privacy policy because they've frozen it in time.<p>This is an app which is advertised to whistleblowers, activists, and others whose lives/freedom could depend on how well they understand the risks involved yet Signal outright lies to them about those same risks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:51:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48461930</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48461930</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48461930</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Surveillance is not safety: A statement on the UK's latest threat to privacy [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's an opt-in feature. <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/08/signal-introduces-free-and-paid-backup-plans-for-your-chats/" rel="nofollow">https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/08/signal-introduces-free-and...</a><p>A service that advertises itself as privacy focused refusing to update their privacy policy while adding features like this seems like a pretty big dead canary.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:51:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455681</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455681</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455681</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Surveillance is not safety: A statement on the UK's latest threat to privacy [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Signal just can't be trusted at this point. They're probably compromised. My theory is that that's why the very first line of their privacy is a lie saying that it's designed to never collect or store sensitive data when they keep a list of your contacts forever in the cloud (and in some cases now even message contents).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:16:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455399</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455399</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455399</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Surveillance is not safety: A statement on the UK's latest threat to privacy [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Signal outright lies in their privacy policy. It opens with "Signal is designed to never collect or store any sensitive information." but they collect and permanently store sensitive information in the cloud (user's name, photo, number, and contacts) and in some cases they even store the contents of messages. They've steadfastly refused to update the policy even as they introduced those features deceiving users about their risks. Signal can't really be trusted at this point.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:12:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455369</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455369</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455369</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Surveillance is not safety: A statement on the UK's latest threat to privacy [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nobody implemented DRM with a gun pointed at their heads, and anyone capable of implementing harmful technology has the skills to work on something else for lots of money implementing other things. It was always a choice.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:07:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455320</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455320</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455320</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Surveillance is not safety: A statement on the UK's latest threat to privacy [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>  Whatever your philosophical stance, history has shown beyond a shadow of a doubt that giving most people complete control over their device has been an unmitigiated disaster.<p>I'd argue that giving governments and corporations control over our devices has also been an unmitigiated disaster. You could say the same thing about any kind of freedom though couldn't you? Freedom is so dangerous after all. Look at all the problems it's caused. Giving up all of our freedoms would surely make the world better right?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:05:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455304</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455304</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455304</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Surveillance is not safety: A statement on the UK's latest threat to privacy [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Christian fascism exists. In the US it's how fascism came to the country. Christofascism doesn't seem to have any problem with the absence of atheism.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:01:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455269</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455269</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455269</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Surveillance is not safety: A statement on the UK's latest threat to privacy [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yet they stopped thinking as soon as their wallet got involved and never considered that their kids also need freedom and the ability to use technology that works for them and not against them. Selfishness and greed are the problem. The kids are just a convenient but shallow way to deflect from that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:51:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455185</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455185</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455185</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Switzerland wil have a referendum to cap population at 10M"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If they're exporting crops that's about feeding <i>somebody</i>. People who would have to try to get their food elsewhere and have to worry about the standards/quality of those new sources. It's even perfectly fine for people to grow and sell flowers. There may be ways to make it more efficient, and maybe the government should be encouraging that so they can buy up some of the saved land, but I'd bet there are ecological consequences to paving over flower farms too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455058</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455058</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455058</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Switzerland wil have a referendum to cap population at 10M"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You don't have to jump right to one child per household (which is a bad idea anyway) but maintaining sustainable population levels should extend beyond just border control. It should include things like building out infrastructure in underdeveloped areas and encouraging (or perhaps even requiring) people to move in the new spaces, enabling and encouraging remote work to free up unnecessary office space and concentration of workers to city centers, and the promotion of sex ed, family planning, and birth control so that the children being born are going to parents who want and are ready for them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:26:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454971</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454971</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454971</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Switzerland wil have a referendum to cap population at 10M"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly. This is one of those "not everyone who cares about border controls are racist, but most racists care a lot about border controls" situations</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:19:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454910</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454910</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454910</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Switzerland wil have a referendum to cap population at 10M"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think that immigration actually is an ecology/sustainability issue. There are economic and cultural effects to immigration as well, and that's what people tend to focus on, but they aren't the only issues to consider. I think every country that has their shit together should be giving serious thought to immigration and sustainability, especially knowing that a massive number of climate refugees are coming in the near future. Preparing for that now would go a long way to keeping quality of life up while still helping out.<p>This specific policy may not be well intentioned, it may even be a means to avoid taking in those refugees when the time comes, but this is the kind of thing that nations should be thinking about right now.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:18:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454900</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454900</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454900</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Switzerland wil have a referendum to cap population at 10M"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It seems like a good idea to start worrying about population long before it feels overcrowded and there's no room left on the trains. The issue isn't about how much open space there is to stuff people into, but about how many people an area can sustainably support. I'm not sure that 10 million is a good target to aim for, but you sure don't want to wait until your quality of life declines before you start making plans.<p>If people are already starting to have trouble finding work and housing that seems like the conversation is long overdue.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454789</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454789</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454789</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Stop the Apple Music app from launching"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you get a Mac it means you're paying a premium for the carefully curated Apple Experience and if you don't like it you just need to Think Different and do only what Apple allows you to do and only in the way that Apple tells you to do it. Once you surrender to Apple there is no more grief and inconvenience, only joy because then It Just Works.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451319</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451319</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451319</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Why are so many young people getting cancer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The scientists they paid off are the ones deciding if food additives are safe too 
<a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/food-safety-scientists-ties-big-090000915.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.yahoo.com/news/food-safety-scientists-ties-big-0...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 20:10:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451152</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451152</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451152</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "What is the purpose of the lost+found folder in Linux and Unix? (2014)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>More like a FOUND.000 folder or a root directory filled with .CHK files</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 19:36:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48437821</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48437821</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48437821</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "Cloudflare CEO is lying to you about the bot traffic jump"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe you could avoid the thornier issues entirely by outlawing the adtech industry instead of free services. With the backbone of surveillance capitalism out of the picture most of the free services would stop existing or move to pay models anyway. Worthwhile free services like the internet archive and wikipedia that aren't spying on users could continue to exist without worry. We'd still lose youtube I think, but maybe video hosting isn't best centralized either.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 23:42:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48419816</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48419816</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48419816</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "India's surprise baby bust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You should try it because I bet you'll find out why pretty fast. It just isn't worth it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 23:32:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48419737</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48419737</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48419737</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autoexec in "India's surprise baby bust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I haven't checked the data for myself, but supposedly, while still not a common cause of death, malnutrition is the fastest growing cause of death in the US (<a href="https://www.the-independent.com/life-style/health-and-families/malnutrition-deaths-seniors-older-people-cdc-2026-b2894677.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.the-independent.com/life-style/health-and-famili...</a>)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 23:29:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48419721</link><dc:creator>autoexec</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48419721</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48419721</guid></item></channel></rss>