<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: awanderingmind</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=awanderingmind</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 04:27:09 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=awanderingmind" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "Ask HN: Share your personal website"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My personal site where I post essays about various things - generated using hakyll: <a href="https://www.awanderingmind.blog/" rel="nofollow">https://www.awanderingmind.blog/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 06:55:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46629001</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46629001</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46629001</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "What to Do When the Trisector Comes (1983) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I found the writing, and the descriptions of the types of trisectors, strangely poignant. Most of us do not attempt to trisect an angle with straightedge and compass; but surely many of us have other irrational obsessions with which we waste our time (I have certainly been guilty of this). I hope people can find time to look up from their interactions with social media and LLMs for enough healthy introspection to avoid these traps.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 08:37:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46510023</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46510023</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46510023</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a strange analogy. The policy saves people money on their power bill. The backyward furnaces are considered a disaster because, among other things, they produced low quality steel, and diverted labour from agriculture and other things, none of which is the case here - people pay for solar panels and install them once, and then achieve savings.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 06:50:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45488342</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45488342</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45488342</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[In Praise of Idleness (1932)]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://harpers.org/archive/1932/10/in-praise-of-idleness/">https://harpers.org/archive/1932/10/in-praise-of-idleness/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45272296">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45272296</a></p>
<p>Points: 152</p>
<p># Comments: 14</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:04:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://harpers.org/archive/1932/10/in-praise-of-idleness/</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45272296</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45272296</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "New knot theory discovery overturns long-held mathematical assumption"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I incorrectly had a ≤ instead of =, my apologies.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 07:47:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45124712</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45124712</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45124712</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "The wall confronting large language models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is a lot of focus in the comments on the authors' credentials and, apparently, their writing style. It is a pity, because I think their discussion of scaling is interesting, even if comparing LLMs to grid-based differential equation solvers might be unconventional (I haven't convinced myself whether the analogy is entirely apt/valid yet, but it could conceivably be).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 07:38:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45124647</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45124647</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45124647</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "New knot theory discovery overturns long-held mathematical assumption"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>According to the actual paper (<a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.24088" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.24088</a>), it has been an open conjecture since at least 1977. The quote:<p>> Unknotting number has long been conjectured to be additive under
connected sum; this conjecture is implicit in the work of Wendt, in one
of the first systematic studies of unknotting number [37]. It is unclear
when and where this was first explicitly stated; most references to it
call it an ‘old conjecture’. It can be found in the problem list of Gordon
[13] from 1977 and in Kirby’s list [16].<p>'Additive' here means that if u(K1) is defined as the unknotting number of the knot K1, and u(K1#K2) the unknotting number of the knots K1 and K2 joined together, then u(K1#K2) = u(K1) + u(K2). It is this that has (assuming the paper is correct) been proven false. A deceptively simple property!<p>edit: I initially incorrectly had a ≤ sign instead of =</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 06:18:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45124146</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45124146</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45124146</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "Irrelevant facts about cats added to math problems increase LLM errors by 300%"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cool example in that link, thanks!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 07:18:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44731636</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44731636</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44731636</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "Psilocybin treatment extends cellular lifespan, improves survival of aged mice"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cool study. I really want to believe the results, but the effect on life extension is so large (see figure 2B) that I find it hard to. Maybe there was some uncontrolled confounding factor? It is noted in the 'Methods' section that 'Researchers were not blinded to group allocation [...]', which is unfortunate.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 07:24:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44680542</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44680542</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44680542</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "The Collapse of the FDA"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This perspective is addressed in the article... TLDR; that doesn't seem to be where this is going.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:38:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44569180</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44569180</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44569180</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "Reflections on Sudoku, or the Impossibility of Systematizing Thought"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a rare type of article - a concrete analysis of different approaches to programming (that are arguably themselves reflections of different cognitive styles), that outlines the shortcomings of one approach in a specific domain, without generalising too much.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 13:59:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44257905</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44257905</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44257905</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Fallacy of Success (G.K. Chesteron, 1908)]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11505/pg11505-images.html#chap03">https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11505/pg11505-images.html#chap03</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44104982">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44104982</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 08:25:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11505/pg11505-images.html#chap03</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44104982</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44104982</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "For algorithms, a little memory outweighs a lot of time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You mean something like this <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremermann%27s_limit" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremermann%27s_limit</a> or this <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_speed_limit" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_speed_limit</a>?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 08:20:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44059929</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44059929</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44059929</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "What does the end of mathematics look like?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I hope you are right - the point about energy efficiency is certainly spot on, and I do think it is possible that people are getting carried away by analogies when discussing the topic (I wrote something about that too, but will avoid linking to it here to avoid excessive self-promotion).<p>That said, the article doesn't assume such a thing will happen soon, just that it may happen at some time in the future. That could be centuries away - I would still argue the end result is something to be concerned about.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 18:08:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44032828</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44032828</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44032828</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "What does the end of mathematics look like?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>English is my second language too - ironically I am not so as proficient in my mother tongue, due to globalisation/imperialism. But it's ok, fortunately I love the language!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 13:59:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44030018</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44030018</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44030018</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "What does the end of mathematics look like?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, it is still a career, but it's very niche, and more attuned to 'art' than 'documenting the world'.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 11:23:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028599</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028599</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028599</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "What does the end of mathematics look like?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for the positive feedback on my writing style! Based on feedback in this thread it seems to be a divisive topic, haha.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 11:22:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028589</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028589</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028589</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "What does the end of mathematics look like?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>True!<p>I don't literally live in a cave, but fortunately not everyone is so allergic to whimsical language :D.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 10:19:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028194</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028194</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028194</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "What does the end of mathematics look like?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A reasonable question - another way of looking at it is that theorems are just a side effect of mathematical research. Much of the world economy depends on things like cryptography, which involves a bunch of theorems. The question is then 'what as yet undiscovered mathematical realms might models think up that could make people money'? It is hard to imagine what doesn't exist yet, but much harder to imagine that all potentially profitable mathematics has already been discovered. This could 'just' look like algorithmic improvements.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 10:17:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028187</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028187</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028187</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by awanderingmind in "What does the end of mathematics look like?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am not suggesting models will be capable of generating 'all' proofs - that is clearly impossible. Merely that they will get better at doing so, and there is no clear reason at the moment to believe they will never reach a human level of competence. If you have one model functioning at such a level, it is presumably trivial to have a million of them, none of which will need to be paid, housed, or sleep etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 10:14:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028163</link><dc:creator>awanderingmind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028163</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44028163</guid></item></channel></rss>