<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: azornathogron</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=azornathogron</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 14:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=azornathogron" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "We should be more ambitious with the software we build"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Digital cameras made photography more accessible to people though, even if they didn't improve it (in an artistic sense) directly.<p>Being able to take pictures at effectively zero marginal cost, and being able to see them instantly, both make it much easier to get into the hobby.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 07:45:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50229233</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50229233</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50229233</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "We should be more ambitious with the software we build"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What indications do you see of significant <i>and effective</i> societal pushback?<p>I would love to believe this but I don't see it yet. I see a lot of anger in some circles, but I also see the machine marching on as normal.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 07:36:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50229196</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50229196</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50229196</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "Beyond the &"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>LWN.net doesn't exclusively cover Linux kernel issues. From the FAQ,<p>What is this LWN thing?<p>LWN.net aims to be the premier news and information source for the free software community. We provide comprehensive coverage of development, legal, commercial, and security issues.<p><a href="https://lwn.net/op/FAQ.lwn" rel="nofollow">https://lwn.net/op/FAQ.lwn</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 12:32:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50194440</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50194440</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50194440</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "The 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement is no longer viable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The reason that total atmospheric CO2 is increasing is because the rate that it's being added is a lot higher than the rate that it is reabsorbed by the various natural carbon sinks (including plants).<p>Only about 10% is reabsorbed quickly [1], the rest stays for hundreds or thousands of years. That may not be "trapped" in a pedantic sense, but it's pretty close.<p>[1] <a href="https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/how-do-we-know-how-long-carbon-dioxide-remains-atmosphere" rel="nofollow">https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/how-do-we-know-how-long-carb...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:32:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50180684</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50180684</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50180684</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "The 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement is no longer viable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Plastic straws are definitely a common form of beach trash, but they were never the "vast majority" of it. Not by item count, and certainly not by mass. They do rank in the top 10, but not at the top.<p>Ocean Conservancy has annual reports that include statistics from trash cleanup projects. The 2026 report[1] has a "global top items collected" list that covers 1986 to 2026; straws (& stirrers) are 5th at about 16 million items collected. Drinks bottles are number 3 at nearly 27 million. Cigarette butts are top (65 million)<p>Looking back at the report from the year 2000[2] as a comparison (this one lists numbers just for the year 2000 cleanup projects), straws are number 10 out of 12, cigarettes are still top, various other plastic items (not all of which are classified) are above straws.<p>[1] <a href="https://oceanconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2026-ICC-Report_digital.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://oceanconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2026...</a>
[2] <a href="https://oceanconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2000-Ocean-Conservancy-International-Report.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://oceanconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2000...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 11:58:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50179428</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50179428</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50179428</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "90% of US working hours are spent on tasks not covered well by AI benchmarks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Pilots can do that because they go through a ton of training and they deliberately do things to maintain their manual flying skills, including regularly taking manual control outside emergencies when the autopilot could fly perfectly well. And when a pilot takes control "for practice" there's no reduction in productivity for the airline compared to if the pilot is sitting in the seat with the autopilot engaged.<p>How can software engineers maintain a healthy "manual programming" skill set?
What <i>employer</i> would be willing to pay for so much wasted time for their software engineers to do deliberate training courses, or willing to accept the productivity loss from their engineers occasionally working manually for practice, when working manually is so much slower?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 21:51:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50125234</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50125234</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50125234</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "LeCun has "zero concerns" about AI wiping out humanity, recent "rogue" incidents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is "token" a directly perceivable unit for the LLM? If you ask it "how many tokens are in this sentence?" can it <i>count</i> them (again, not guessing or making a tool call)?<p>I've never tried it and it might take some thought and effort to conduct an experiment to find out properly, but I would be interested in the answer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:10:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49954073</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49954073</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49954073</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "Without the Hot Air"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Which are you referring to as the primary comparison?<p>If I'm understanding the book's structure correctly, the comparison at the end of Part 1 (chapter 18 "Can we live on renewables?") is based on estimating existing demand. Deployment of heat pumps in Britain even today is woefully low, and when the book was written it was no doubt even lower, so of course it wouldn't make sense to include heat pumps as a significant factor when comparing actual demand when the book was written with potential supply.<p>Chapter 27 "Five energy plans for Britain" discusses large scale ways to make the energy budget "work", and those hypothetical comparisons do include use of heat-pumps. Maybe those numbers are inaccurate and a better hypothetical could be produced today, but I would first put that down to the difficulty of forecasting the future.<p>It's been a long time since I read the book fully though. Did I miss something?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 14:12:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49893655</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49893655</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49893655</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "Sustainable energy without the hot air (2008)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Heat pumps, and their efficiency (getting more than X Joules of heating for X Joules of electricity) are discussed in chapter 21 Smarter Heating, see for example the diagram and discussion on page 150: <a href="https://www.withouthotair.com/c21/page_150.shtml" rel="nofollow">https://www.withouthotair.com/c21/page_150.shtml</a><p>I imagine the economics (and perhaps technical improvements) of some things may have changed more than the book could forecast. But heat pumps were definitely understood by the author.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 13:39:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49893067</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49893067</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49893067</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "Updated Google Maps shows destruction of the city of Rafah"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Page and Brin together hold over 50% <i>of voting shares</i>, even though their economic share is lower as you suggest. Different share classes.<p><a href="https://aifundingtracker.com/who-owns-alphabet/" rel="nofollow">https://aifundingtracker.com/who-owns-alphabet/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 01:22:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49886848</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49886848</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49886848</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in ""As a Language Model": Chat Template Switches LLM Self-Referential Voice"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Going to the doctor for expert advice is often inconvenient, or time consuming, or expensive, or stressful. I think a lot of people want, and seek out, information and advice based on their symptoms, as a first step before a possible doctor's visit. Before LLMs, WebMD (and excessive self-diagnosis based on WebMD) was a meme for a while.<p>So with regard to LLMs, for me the question is not purely "how often does it get it right?" the question is "how does it compare to the sources and self-diagnosis methods people use otherwise?"<p>Of course, I agree people should be careful with any form of self-diagnosis or LLM-diagnosis.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 15:04:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49867259</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49867259</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49867259</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "Show HN: Jexxa: High Speed on Device Dictation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The way this used to be handled is to sell new versions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 14:30:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49713118</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49713118</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49713118</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "The ColorChecker, photography's most important 24 squares, turns 50"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh, interesting. That does make sense.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 10:52:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49608544</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49608544</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49608544</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "Whistle Synth Mac App"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sounds a bit like imitone <a href="https://imitone.com/" rel="nofollow">https://imitone.com/</a> (I have no affiliation)<p>FYI, Imitone has a patent, I don't know what it covers or claims though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 18:09:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49601173</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49601173</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49601173</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "The ColorChecker, photography's most important 24 squares, turns 50"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't know anything about it, but I find this interesting, perhaps slightly surprising. It doesn't suprise me that it would fade, but, that being a presumably known problem, do the color checkers not have a good cover/case for storage? (something foil backed or similar to really block out the light)? Or do they even fade quickly just from being taken out briefly for use?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 10:21:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49596483</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49596483</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49596483</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "Changes at Google DeepMind: Demis Hassabis from CEO to Chair, Jeff Dean departs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do Zuck or Altman have charisma?<p>(Jobs I'll give you.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 22:04:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49203241</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49203241</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49203241</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "Google fixed more Chrome bugs in June than over the past two years, thanks to AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Neither Mythos nor Gemini are open-weight models (right?) so I'm not sure what model(s) this is actually referring to.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:25:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49126093</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49126093</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49126093</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "Wikipedia escapes Category 1 designation under the UK Online Safety Act for now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> chronyism (not sure of that spelling)<p>Since you mentioned you weren't sure: it's "cronyism", no 'h'.<p><a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cronyism" rel="nofollow">https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cronyism</a><p>This is despite having an etymology that - at least according to etymonline - does come from greek "khronos"<p><a href="https://www.etymonline.com/word/cronyism" rel="nofollow">https://www.etymonline.com/word/cronyism</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:54:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48904826</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48904826</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48904826</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "Prefer strict tables in SQLite"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes.<p>From the release notes:<p>2002-06-17 (2.5.0), "Parse (but do not implement) foreign keys."<p>At one point there was also a tool which would generate trigger rules to enforce foreign key constraints. (2008 Oct 15 (3.6.4), Added the source code and documentation for the genfkey program for automatically generating triggers to enforce foreign key constraints)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 22:21:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876399</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876399</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876399</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by azornathogron in "Microsoft Fire IdTech Team at Id Software"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Armadillo Aerospace was Carmack's own rocket company.<p>And tbh I'm not sure it was ever a plausible contender for commercial success, more like Carmack wanted to play with rockets. But that might be unfair; I would happily accept a correction.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armadillo_Aerospace" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armadillo_Aerospace</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 17:19:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820763</link><dc:creator>azornathogron</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820763</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820763</guid></item></channel></rss>