<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: baconner</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=baconner</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 19:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=baconner" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Anthropic Cowork feature creates 10GB VM bundle on macOS without warning"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What the other poster here said for testing against a reference, but also as an easier to get started with base for my own coding sandbox with coding agents. Took me quite a while to build one on my own that I was semi-happy with but I'd imagine one solid enough to run cowork on safely might have some deeper thinking and review behind it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 22:06:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47224853</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47224853</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47224853</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Anthropic Cowork feature creates 10GB VM bundle on macOS without warning"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ok I'd seen some sample sandbox scripts for this from anthropic before but not a full reference container. nice, thank you for sharing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 22:03:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47224815</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47224815</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47224815</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Anthropic Cowork feature creates 10GB VM bundle on macOS without warning"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>FWIW I think many of us would actually very much love to have an official (or semi official) Claude sandboxing container image base / vm base. I wonder if you all have considered making something like the cowork vm available for that?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 16:49:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47220466</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47220466</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47220466</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their classified network"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was trying to make no particular call on the actual reason aside from pointing at how obviously not the real story and false the statements made so far are. What a knot you have to tie yourself into to seek out an explanation where OpenAI has not made an ethical compromise to stay in the game here. I can stretch and think of some ways but they are far from the simplest explanation.<p>Lots of responses below give the likely real reasons most of which are probably true in part, but my opinion is it's the primary reason all who is in and who is out decisions are made by the trump administration - fealty. Skills, value brought, qualifications, etc. none of that matter above passing frequent loyalty tests, appealing to ego, bribes (sorry, i mean donations). Imagine thinking "hey, we'll work towards fully autonomous killbots because our adversaries will get them too but the tech isn't strong enough to allow them loose yet" or "yes you can use our ai for your panopticon surveillance, but just not on our own citizens because that is illegal" are lefty woke stances but here we are. Dario failed the loyalty test, as anyone rational would.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 21:13:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210705</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210705</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210705</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "We do not think Anthropic should be designated as a supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"We do not think Anthropic should be designated as a supply chain risk"<p>...but we're not willing to reject a contract to back that up, and so our words will not change anything for Anthropic, or help the collective AI model industry (even ourselves) hold a firm line on ethical use of models in the future.<p>The fact is if one of the top tier foundation models allows for these uses there's no protection against it for any of them - the only way this works if they hold a line together which unfortunately they're just not going to do. I don't just see OpenAI at fault here, Anthropic is clearly ok with other highly questionable use cases if these are their only red lines. We don't think the technology is ready for fully autonomous killbots, but will work on getting it there is not exactly the ethical stand folks are making their position today out to be.<p>I found this interview with Dario last night to be particularly revealing - it's good they are drawing a line and they're clearly navigating a very difficult and chaotic high pressure relationship (as is everyone dealing with this admin) but he's pretty open to autonomous weapons, and other "lawful" uses whatever they may be <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPTNHrq_4LU" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPTNHrq_4LU</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 03:55:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47203526</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47203526</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47203526</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their classified network"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Respectfully, it's very hard to see how anyone could look at what just happened and come to the conclusion that one company ends up classed a "supply chain risk" while another agrees the the same terms that led to that. Either the terms are looser, they're not going to be enforced, or there's another reason for the loud attempt to blacklist Anthropic. It's very difficult to see how you could take this at face value in any case. If it is loose terms or a wink agreement to not check in on enforcement you're never going to be told that. We can imagine other scenerios where the terms stated were not the real reason for the blacklisting, but it's a real struggle (at least for me) to find an explanation for this deal that doesn't paint OpenAI in a very ethically questionable light.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 06:43:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47191302</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47191302</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47191302</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Anthropic officially bans using subscription auth for third party use"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They can't catch everything but they can make your product you're building on top of it non viable when it gets popular enough to look for, like they did with opencode.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 03:45:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47069645</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47069645</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47069645</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Anthropic officially bans using subscription auth for third party use"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For sure, yes. They already added attempts to block opencode, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 03:23:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47069500</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47069500</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47069500</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>NVIDIA makes money no matter if the model is open weights or not. I don't think open is a concern for them and they'd very much like to be servicing China and their batch of open models I think. what's concerning them more likely is<p>A. The inevitable breakdown of their massive head start with CUDA and data center hardware. A serious competitor at real scale.<p>B. Anything that'll cool off the massive data center buildouts that are fueling them.<p>Seems clear that locking up a major potential competitor especially the minds behind it solves for A. And their ongoing machinations with circular funding of companies funding data centers is all about B - keeping the momentum before it fizzles.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2025 04:35:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46408479</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46408479</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46408479</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "A guide to local coding models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are a couple of decent approaches to having a planning/reviewer model set (eg. claude, codex, gemini) and an execution model (eg. glm 4.6, flash models, etc) workflow that I've tried. All three of these will let you live in a single coding cli but swap in different models for different tasks easily.<p>- claude code router - basically allows you to swap in other models using the real claude code cli and set up some triggers for when to use which one (eg. plan mode use real claude, non plan or with keywords use glm)<p>- opencode - this is what im mostly using now. similar to ccr but i find it a lot more reliable against alt models. thinking tasks go to claude, gemini, codex and lesser execution tasks go to glm 4.6 (on ceberas).<p>- sub-agent mcp - Another cool way is to use an mcp (or a skill or custom /command) that runs another agent cli for certain tasks. The mcp approach is neat because then your thinker agent like claude can decide when to call the execution agents, when to call in another smart model for a review of it's own thinking, etc instead of it being explicit choice from you. So you end up with the mcp + an AGENTS.md that instructs it to aggressively use the sub-agent mcp when it's a basic execution task, review, ...<p>I also find that with this setup just being able to tap in an alt model when one is stuck, or get review from an alt model can help keep things unstuck and moving.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 06:49:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46351925</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46351925</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46351925</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "US Tech Force"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's a nice idea, so nice in fact that it already existed as 18F until they closed it under the guise of efficiency earlier this year and are now starting over.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 22:15:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46281543</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46281543</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46281543</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "CBP is monitoring US drivers and detaining those with suspicious travel patterns"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Its not hard to distugush individual pictures that contain trackable attributes like a license plate number from building a large scale database of them for sale. Or making such a database not legal to sell access to without removing that information, etc. It doesn't need to center on the contents of a single photo.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 21:52:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45998310</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45998310</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45998310</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "The Capitol Attack Doesn’t Justify Expanding Surveillance"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's pretty sad watching all the comments here calling this suggestion mccarthyism, witch hunt, etc. Police departments should be doing this and holding their employees to a high standard that's not a witch hunt that's common sense.<p>If you are a member of a violent gang or are too racist to police justly you are too dangerous to employ as a cop.  Not looking for and removing these people is intentionally turning a blind eye to the extreme danger they present to people in their communities.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2021 19:50:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25703982</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25703982</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25703982</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Tableau acquires ClearGraph, a data analysis startup using natural language"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I do agree. It can work and when you've put the time into designing it to work then it can feel fairly magical, but there's a point at which you feel like you're almost pre-creating all the queries for users.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 03:32:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14986392</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14986392</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14986392</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Tableau acquires ClearGraph, a data analysis startup using natural language"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>this here. I've spent the last couple of years working on a similar data discovery style product and after a lot of playing around with concepts I think semi-natural language descriptions typed and also generated based on your manual data selection can be really useful.<p>If I'm speaking i have to finish the whole thought and deal with excluding all my "uuhms" and half thoughts. If I'm typing i can intellisense prompt for relevant things. Correlate Sales with _[Discounts, ...]. I think terse natural langage descriptions of data views are really useful aside from voice.<p>Incidentally nothing like trying to play around with this stuff to make you super self conscious about uuh how you speak.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 03:29:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14986382</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14986382</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14986382</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Tableau acquires ClearGraph, a data analysis startup using natural language"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My experience with this is it's more of a gimmick. It's cool when it works but most of the time I've found it simpler and more accurate to just select the data you want.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 01:26:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14985934</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14985934</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14985934</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Facets: An Open Source Visualization Tool for Machine Learning Training Data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They've got all the building blocks really. For instance check out sand dance <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/sanddance/" rel="nofollow">https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/sanddance/</a><p>It's just that Microsoft is so focused on getting you into azure services that they're pushing these capabilities up there instead.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:11:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14793854</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14793854</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14793854</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Please Make Google AMP Optional"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To be fair I also use a VPN a lot of the time with adblocking. That does speed up a lot of high ad sites.<p>Bugwise though I've had the same issues over a couple of different phones.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2017 04:28:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14530635</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14530635</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14530635</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Please Make Google AMP Optional"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Your hypothetical there assumes that AMP actually works well. My experience is it's got painful usability issues at least on android chrome. The worst one I see all the time is scrolling down to actually read the AMP page frequently results in the page closing, returning you to results.<p>Fast is good, but at least it ought to be a good user experience. I used to use google news a lot, but i totally abandoned it after constant frustrating experiences with AMP. Plus most of the amp-ified pages don't seem significantly faster than the original page. I'm not seeing the utility for users, just for google.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:03:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14530389</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14530389</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14530389</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by baconner in "Math Professor Fighting Gerrymandering with Geometry"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The cost isn't the only issue though. You still have to somehow get to the DMV to get it and oops many Texas DMVs were closed in poorer Democrat leaning areas so it's now a time consuming and expensive journey to go get it. Might be an hour or two away but you can't miss your minimum wage job during business hours or no rent money so what are you going to do? Or say you're old and impoverished and don't have your birth certificate now its a huge problem to get that id. Might be you have to travel to another state and go through a DMV like process to get a copy first and again you don't have the means or time.<p>Texas' strict voter ID requirement was struck down in the courts last summer precisely because of these reasons. It was found that the law, despite free IDs significantly disadvantages black and latino voter's in the state who are much more likely to have issues like above. Didn't stop polling place workers in some areas though some of whom still turned people away based on the non-existent requirement.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:59:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13724190</link><dc:creator>baconner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13724190</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13724190</guid></item></channel></rss>