Academic books are also peer-reviewed.

It made me realize that one of the more troublesome things Google did was train us all to expect tech to be free. And then, by extension, trained us to accept shitty tech precisely because it was free.

I never said there were no instances of sexual assault by taxi drivers; just pointing out that there’s a real crisis of rampant assault with Uber for which there are solutions that they’ve essentially refused to entertain because they don’t want to take responsibility for their drivers. I’m saying that these companies need to be held responsible for their role in this problem.

I like that Discourse only has an upvote button and no downvote, but that the replies still stay in chronological order. That way there’s an actual flow to the conversation but you can still see which ideas people value.

Of course, almost nobody uses the vote this way anymore. While your granular voting is quite interesting in principle, in practicality it seems it would negatively compound the existing problems with the vote system, namely that instead of voting to support the continuation of good faith discussion, everyone is voting to support just their own ideas. That in turn leads to fractious discussion (if we can even call it discussion) where the most popular and well-known ideas are strongly upvoted and continue to circulate, and anything deviating is barely seen. Then you don’t really have a discussion; you just have a series of highly upvoted statements. (See, for example, Reddit.)

This is a very optimistic outlook, to the point of naivete, though I really hope you are right. In reality, neither Trump nor his cronies are acting like people who imagine they will be out of power anytime soon. In 10 years the world will likely still be dealing with the fallout of this administration, if not still dealing with the administration itself.

Which means all poor public school districts (free breakfast programs are funded with federal money) and most other public schools districts (special needs programs are funded with federal money). So the “only” here is basically “all” public school districts.

It just needs to be illegal to make an AI likeness of someone without their consent. I honestly still don’t understand why it’s not. It’s a whole new form of exploitation when brothel owners want to create AI porn that will be more profitable for them than the sex work taking place in the brothel yet they don’t want to pay the sex workers for the porn (or even get their consent to create it).

A deed is meaningless if what it represents doesn’t have the potential for real value.

edit: I commented before clicking on the link (bad me). I has assumed the “experiment” was at no cost to the participant. Now that I see that there is a fee ($10) for a deed to nothing, the “experiment” seems more like yet another AI-driven cash grab.