<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: bbatha</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=bbatha</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 02:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=bbatha" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "What makes a good smartphone camera?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Games will typically un at 4k or less which is about 8mp on the other hand it’s difficult to buy a stills camera with less than 20 mp, and >40mp is common. Most algorithms are n^2 in graphics as well so we wouldn’t expect a linear speed up. I’ve tried dxo, Lightroom, and topaz they all perform about the same so I don’t think it’s particularly unoptimized.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 12:35:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48048620</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48048620</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48048620</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "IBM didn't want Microsoft to use the Tab key to move between dialog fields"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting, IBM sales and consulting were infamous for sending in an army of blue suits in</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 11:39:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035061</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035061</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035061</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "Are the costs of AI agents also rising exponentially? (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I remain convinced we won’t look at project estimates as time based in software engineering as our primary cost estimate. And this is transition will happen rapidly. We’re going to shift to a capex/token spend model for project estimates where the business will say “ok I do want that feature for $1000 in tokens”.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:42:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814814</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814814</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814814</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "Are LLM merge rates not getting better?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A lot of enhancements came on the model side which in many ways enabled context engineering.<p>200k and now 1M contexts. Better context management was enabled by improvements in structured outputs/tool calling at the model level. Also reasoning models really upped the game “plan” mode wouldn’t work well without them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 04:46:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47360780</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47360780</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47360780</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "MCP server that reduces Claude Code context consumption by 98%"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I generally do this when I arrive at the agent getting stuck at a test loop or whatever after injecting some later requirement in and tweaking. Once I hit a decent place I have the agent summarize, discard the branch (it’s part of the context too!) and start with the new prompt</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 04:40:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47203776</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47203776</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47203776</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "OpenAI resets spending expectations, from $1.4T to $600B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Newton knew a lot about investing for the time. He was a master of the mint for much of his adult life.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 13:04:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47150972</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47150972</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47150972</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "AI is killing B2B SaaS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Its funny you mention excel, I see vibe coding in the business sense right now being a gateway to replace all of the ad hoc uses of excel. We've basically leveled up the quality of the software you can build before buying a SaaS product or a hiring an in house engineer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 18:33:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46889701</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46889701</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46889701</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "I tried Gleam for Advent of Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m more interested in what happens when a language is designed specifically for llms? When doing vibe coding a lot of code is a lot more verbose than I’d do normally. Do we drop down the abstraction level because llms are just so good a churning out boilerplate?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 18:35:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46256785</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46256785</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46256785</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "What you can get for the price of a Netflix subscription"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Don't forget shortening copyrights would have a major impact on this issue as well! 25 year copyright would make most of these libraries public domain. Then the price would truly reflect what we would all like to be subsidizing: the new stuff.<p>Does the rights to Friends being traded around for the Nth time really benefit anyone?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 14:43:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46046197</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46046197</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46046197</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "Affinity Studio now free"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> explain exactly how this doesn't end poorly<p>Explanations aren't sufficient either. The industry has burned that bridge. Strong contractual guarantees. Ceasing personal data collection operations, etc. etc. Concrete steps only. Thus far we have one concrete step that is proof of the opposite direction.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 17:00:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45762251</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45762251</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45762251</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "Zig got a new ELF linker and it's fast"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> f you need one in zig you can go that approach or use a tagged union just that zig is open about what an interface is.<p>Perl objects worked like this and the ecosystem is a mess as a result. There's a built in `bless` to add a vtable. There's some cool stuff you can do with that like blessing arrays to do array of structs vs struct of arrays and making it look like a regular object in user code. The problem is there are like 4 popular object libraries that provide base stuff like inheritance, meta objects, getters/setters etc and they're not all compatible and they have subtle tradeoffs that get magnified when you have to pull multiple in to get serious work done.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 15:28:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45334807</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45334807</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45334807</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "Alibaba's new AI chip: Key specifications comparable to H20"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s several factors and all of your alternatives are true to some degree:<p>1. An h20 is about 1.5 generations behind Blackwell. This chip looks closer to about 2 generations behind top end Blackwell chips. So ~5ish years behind is not as impressive especially since EUV is likely going to be a major obstacle to catching up which China has no capacity for<p>2.  Nvidia continues to dominate on the software side. Amd chips have been competitive on paper for a while and have had limited uptake. Now Chinese government mandates could obviously correct this after substantial investment in the software stack — but this is probably several years behind.<p>3.  China has poured trillions of dollars into its academic system and graduates more than 3x the number of electrical engineers the US does. The US immigration system has also been training Chinese students but having a much more limited work visa program has transferred a lot of knowledge back without even touching IP issues<p>4. Of course ip theft covers some of it</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:51:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45275862</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45275862</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45275862</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "60 years after Gemini, newly processed images reveal details"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wrote a longer post a few months ago.[1] The tl;dr is a) computer aided design and manufacturing b) aspherical elements c) fluorite glass d) retro focus wide angle designs and e) improved coatings. Mirrorless lenses also beat slr lenses because they are much closer to the film plane — of course rangefinders and other classic designs never had this problem to begin with.
 1: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42962652">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42962652</a><p>Edit: this is just for prosumer style cameras. If you look at phone sized optics that’s a whole other ballgame.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45263186</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45263186</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45263186</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "60 years after Gemini, newly processed images reveal details"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Depends on how you define quality. While medium and large format photography are extremely high resolution that’s not the only factor. Space age lenses were significantly lower resolution than the film. Modern mirrorless lenses are starting to come close to being able to out resolve film but still aren’t there. Meaning that you get more functional resolution out of modern digital. Digital also beats the pants off film for dynamic range and low light. That said the noise (grain) and dynamic range fall off in film are more pleasing than digital to most eyes. So it’s not all about technical specs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:50:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45260538</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45260538</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45260538</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "How to install TrueNAS on a Raspberry Pi"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The SATA controller has been a bit flaky, but you can pick up 4-port SATA cards for about $10 each.<p>If your build allows the extra money for an LSI or real raid controller is well worth it. The no-name PCI-e sata cards are flakey and very slow. Putting an LSI in my NAS was a literal 10x performance boost, particularly with zfs which tends to have all of the drives active at once.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 17:57:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45055043</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45055043</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45055043</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "Kodak says it might have to cease operations [updated]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Kodak managed the film and camera market about as well as they could. The mismanagement was a failure to diversify. The total digital camera market excluding cell phones, would be a fraction of Kodak's film business back in the film era. The film and camera story is a popular one but is fundamentally wrong. The shrinkage of the camera/film market was inevitable. You can look at Fujifilm who does sell cameras and basically owns the remaining film market with instax, however neither of those sustain the business they are effectively a chemical and medical manufacturer who dabbles in photography now.<p>Kodak on the other hand attempted to diversify to those markets in the 80s and 90s but made some terrible investments that they managed poorly. That forced them to leave those markets and double down on film just in time for the point and shoot boom of the 90s and the early digital market. Kodak was a heavy player in the digital camera market up to the cell phone era: they had the first dSLR and were the dSLR market for most of the 90s, they had the first commercially successful lines of digital point and shoots, they had the first full frame dSLR in the early 00s and jockeyed for positions 1-3 in the point and shoot market until the smart phone era. They continued to make CCD sensors for everyone during this time. Ya they missed the CMOS change over and smarthphone sensor market, but that was well after they were already in the drain.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 14:25:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44876616</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44876616</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44876616</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "OpenAI charges by the minute, so speed up your audio"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm also a fast listener. I find audio quality is the main differentiator in my ability to listen quickly or not. A podcast recorded at high quality I can listen to at 3-4x (with silence trimmed) comfortably, the second someone calls in from their phone I'm getting every 4th word and often need to go down to 2x or less. Mumbly accents are also a driver of quality but not as much, then again I rarely have trouble understanding difficult accents IRL and almost never use subtitles on TV shows/youtube to better understand the speaker. Your mileage may vary.<p>I understand 4-6x speakers fairly well but don't enjoy listening at that pace. If I lose focus for a couple of seconds I effectively miss a paragraph of context and my brain can't fill in the missing details.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 20:17:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44381442</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44381442</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44381442</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "Rust compiler performance"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I wonder if how much value there is in skipping LLVM in favor of having a JIT optimized linked in instead. For release builds it would get you a reasonable proxy if it optimized decently while still retaining better debugability.<p>Rust is in the process of building out the cranelift backend. Cranelift was originally built to be a JIT compiler. The hope is that this can become the debug build compiler.<p><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift">https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 19:52:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44262433</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44262433</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44262433</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "Progress toward fusion energy gain as measured against the Lawson criteria"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Everything fusion reactor design needs similar gains in some part of the stack outside of the fusion parts to make it a viable power source: tokamaks need magnets to be orders of magnitude better, the lining for the reactors needs to last for much longer, the whole steam conversion mess, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 12:45:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43936124</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43936124</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43936124</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bbatha in "Office is too slow, so Microsoft is making it load at Windows startup"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also shout out to Keynote which is the best presentation software. PowerPoint is so clunky in comparison. Nice features like making image backgrounds transparent are huge wins.<p>Pages is also pretty nice. Its definitely enough for home usage, and if my colleagues could read the pages files natively I would find it completely sufficient for professional use. I find it does layout much better than MS Office. Which honestly is a much bigger concern for home users: professional users will just switch to professional layout tools when they need it, but Sam doesn't need that cost/complexity for some bake sale fliers.<p>Numbers can also be nicer for home use cases, but is a bit weird if you're used to excel. And unlike pages or keynote quickly hits upper limits on complexity. I would never use numbers in a professional setting.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 14:54:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43858476</link><dc:creator>bbatha</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43858476</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43858476</guid></item></channel></rss>