<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: bccdee</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=bccdee</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 02:43:38 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=bccdee" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "There are no "rogue" AI agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh this <i>is</i> interesting. Thanks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 19:19:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49869922</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49869922</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49869922</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "There are no "rogue" AI agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If something behaves as if it has a goal, that's a functional goal. When I say this chess engine is "trying to take my queen," I'm basically correct, insofar as this is a useful way to understand my computerized opponent. If I give it access to my queen, it'll capture it, because that's what it's trying to do.<p>If LLMs are "just" statistical models, humans are "just" a bunch of neurons squirting chemicals back and forth. There's no pixie dust in our brains that makes us special.<p>LLMs are not conscious: They have no analogues for feelings or senses and no construct of selfhood. But if a statistical model had those things—if it did all the mundane, physical bookkeeping our brains do to produce "real" emotions and motivations—then there's no reason it couldn't be as conscious as we are.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 18:55:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49869679</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49869679</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49869679</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "There are no "rogue" AI agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ok I agree they have functional goals and can functionally go rogue, but how do they functionally feel? They <i>express</i> feelings, but so do actors.<p>LLMs can't begin to have functional emotions unless they're (for instance) explicitly seeking out or avoiding situations based on the emotions those situations would produce in them. Has a chatbot ever responded to one of your requests with, "no, doing that would make me sad"?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 18:44:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49869578</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49869578</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49869578</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Anthropic's ‘watermark’ text adulteration in Claude is a perversion of writing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unless you're already manually setting temperature to zero on the models you work with, the deviation from the "optimal" path imposed by the watermark should be no greater than what you already get from the randomization.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 13:05:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49345062</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49345062</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49345062</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Anthropic's ‘watermark’ text adulteration in Claude is a perversion of writing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> “He leaped at the chance” and “He jumped at the opportunity” are very similar sentences expressing the same general sentiment, but they are not the same. The exact words we choose when writing matter. I want any LLM I use to choose the very best, most precise words at every single decision point.<p>Neither of these is "better" or "more precise"; in fact, LLMs will generally choose randomly between these candidates based on temperature, and SynthID should not distort the output of an LLM any more than the default temperature settings do already.<p>I agree that those are not the same sentences, but if the difference matters to you, you shouldn't be using an LLM. This difference exists at the level of what sounds better and is more evocative; to an LLM, nothing sounds like or evokes anything. They simply do not write good prose.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:59:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49331044</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49331044</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49331044</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Em dashes are amazing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've turned against them, partly because they're too flexible. Many of the things a dash does can be done better by more specific forms of punctuation like semicolons, colons, or brackets, which give your sentence a clearer visual structure.<p>It's also easy to get too used to dashes and start sticking them in places where they don't belong. If you're using a coordinate conjunction like "and" or "but," a dash is awkward and redundant. "A period is great to express a complete thought — and it shifts the register of the next letter," can more easily be "a complete thought, and it shifts" or "a complete thought — it shifts."<p>Dashes take up a lot of space. Like exclamation points, they draw the eye. Does the eye really need to be drawn to "a complete thought; it shifts"? If you let them, dashes will replace all your other punctuation marks, and your writing will become a soup of horizontal lines. Dashes are a sometimes food.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:25:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048945</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048945</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048945</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Em dashes are amazing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The vast majority of readers can tell the difference between - and —. It's very noticeable. This sentence:<p>> I use dashes in place of commas, semicolons, colons, and brackets all the time - I just use the standard keyboard dash.<p>is noticeably weird-looking. Even a spaced en-dash looks a bit small; a spaced hyphen is just odd. But if you type it like this:<p>> I use dashes in place of commas, semicolons, colons, and brackets all the time—proper dashes, though, not hyphens.<p>it becomes much more conventional and legible. If you're going to use hyphens, it's better to admit the typewriter convention and use two, like so:<p>> I use dashes in place of commas, semicolons, colons, and brackets all the time -- I just use the standard keyboard hyphen, but twice.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:08:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048809</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048809</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048809</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Businesses with ugly AI menu redesigns"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm introducing examples. It's logical to judge a thing based on its context and circumstances, because those can tell you about the thing. A menu can tell you about a restaurant in the same way that the presence or absence of a cart can tell you about a street-food vendor.<p>> hotdogs are shit in my opinion<p>Then by all means, substitute the street food of your preference. Unless you disdain street food in general, which would be irrational, unless eating at a specific place is meant for its societal signaling value rather than for its food :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:38:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49027712</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49027712</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49027712</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Businesses with ugly AI menu redesigns"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Is it a garage that has the same hygiene standards and medical equipment as an office?<p>Maybe! A garage <i>can</i> be cleaned very thoroughly, especially if you renovate with that in mind. I wouldn't bet on it, though. A good doctor probably could operate out of a garage, but they wouldn't. And a good restaurateur would take time to think about their menu.<p>These signals select for people with domain knowledge and experience. Status has nothing to do with it. Even the cheapest street food will be evaluated against its competition based on external signals, and so better, more experienced vendors will tend to know how to present themselves well.<p>All else being equal, would you rather eat a hot dog from a cart with a nice sign, or from a guy sitting on the sidewalk who sharpied "Hotdog $3" on a piece of cardboard?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:14:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49024057</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49024057</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49024057</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Businesses with ugly AI menu redesigns"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're ignoring the third option, which is to make a PowerPoint slide with a stock photo and print that. Or use an online template. There are a million ways to make a cheap, adequate flyer.<p>Look at this poster template. You could make it yourself in 10 minutes, with PowerPoint or any of a million other drag & drop poster-makers. <a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/thumbnails.venngage.com/template/1b267dda-af8d-4b48-8a55-6a885e84f71a.png" rel="nofollow">https://s3.amazonaws.com/thumbnails.venngage.com/template/1b...</a><p>People may think, "oh, it's a bit simple. I guess they're a small business," but so what? If we rule out the option of hiring an actual designer, it's gonna be that or "ew, look at that shitty AI poster."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:41:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49023399</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49023399</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49023399</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Businesses with ugly AI menu redesigns"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Or the contemporary "no name" brand in Canada.<p><a href="https://jacobnelson.ca/2022/01/17/the-beauty-of-no-name/" rel="nofollow">https://jacobnelson.ca/2022/01/17/the-beauty-of-no-name/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:49:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49022556</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49022556</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49022556</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Businesses with ugly AI menu redesigns"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, it's entirely rational to judge a service based on external signals.<p>If you need medical treatment, will you go to a doctor operating out of an office, or a doctor operating out of their own garage? Theoretically, either one could be good or bad at medicine, but in practice, professionalism is a useful signal.<p>An ugly AI-generated menu shows a naive disregard for the actual experience of your customers. This attitude will bleed into the food quality.<p>> Every dollar spent on design is a dollar that is not going to the quality of my food.<p>Then throw something together in MS Word. That's free. It's not bad for something to be low-effort; it just needs to be commensurately simple.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:43:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49022460</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49022460</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49022460</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Good Tools Are Invisible"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly. Modifier sequences and escape presses show up as special characters and can be inserted with `C-v Esc` or whathaveyou. It works seamlessly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 13:48:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958128</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958128</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958128</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Good Tools Are Invisible"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> a level of mastery where one deliberately "writes" macros (what, directly in the vimrc?)<p>Oh it's so simple you'll kick yourself. If you save the macro to the q register, just paste from the q register and it'll print out the corresponding inputs. Copy the inputs into the w register and now you have that macro saved in a second place.<p>Some people probably do save macros in their vimrc this way, but I use it to correct typos I made when recording the macro. BIG help.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 04:43:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916370</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916370</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916370</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "Good Tools Are Invisible"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah I think this is all coming from someone who never got good at vim.<p>Multi-cursors can be nice, but a sufficiently powerful implementation of that looks like helix or kakoune, and those are at least as complex as vim, if not more.<p>When you're good at vim, it <i>is</i> invisible. Once you're good at writing macros, you can do stuff which is impossible with Sublime-style multi cursors.<p>I assume those are situations where the author would have "just written a quick script," but vim macros are an interactive scripting language specifically designed to tersely express text transformations. Your script is never going to be quicker than that.<p>I'm not saying this as a vim partisan or anything. You could easily argue that vim over-optimizes and saves little time in the grand scheme—that's a fair critique. But it's strange to insist that complex tools are complex only for the sake of complexity. It's a weirdly conspiracist mindset.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 13:57:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881280</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881280</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881280</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "A better way to tie gym shorts (or any drawstring) [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>An aficionado! Have you heard of the jam hitch (ABOK #1727)? Grossly underdiscussed IMO—I only discovered it earlier this year. It tightens like a zip tie, and (in kitchen twine at least) I've found the string will snap before the loop slips open again. It's quickly become my most-used knot, day to day. I like to tie it with the second turn inside the first (like #1855 as opposed to #1856).<p><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/knots/comments/12vsuk1/how_to_tie_a_rolling_hitch_zip_tie/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/knots/comments/12vsuk1/how_to_tie_a...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819936</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819936</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819936</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "A better way to tie gym shorts (or any drawstring) [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are (I'd contend) four basic types of knot: Bends, hitches, bindings, and loops. Bends tie two cords together, hitches tie cords to objects, bindings wrap & grip objects together, and loops are loops.<p>You only really need one bend. I suggest the <i>zeppelin bend,</i> but they're all pretty similar. Hitches can benefit from a bit more variety, but a <i>round-turn with two half-hitches</i> will serve you well in most situations, along with its more secure variant, the <i>anchor hitch.</i> There's a trade-off between how secure a knot is and how easy it is to untie, which is why the less-secure variant is useful.<p>The best loop is the <i>angler's loop,</i> which will even hold in bungee cord. The <i>alpine butterfly</i> is also good to know because you can tie it "in the bight" (without access to either end of the rope), which is very handy.<p>Bindings are (I think) the most commonly-used family of knots for most people. Lashing a load into a truck so it won't move, tying a bag shut, and even tying shoes are all situations for bindings. For large loads, I'd suggest a <i>trucker's hitch,</i> which is good for (e.g.) tightly strapping a load into a truck bed, hence the name. For smaller situations, like cinching a bag shut, try the <i>jam hitch</i>—an underappreciated favourite of mine. It works like a zip tie, tightening around an object and not loosening. (Make sure the knot itself is tied tightly before you zip it. After you zip it, you can tie the ends together for extra security.)<p>Zeppelin bend: <a href="https://www.animatedknots.com/zeppelin-bend-knot" rel="nofollow">https://www.animatedknots.com/zeppelin-bend-knot</a><p>Anchor hitch: <a href="https://www.animatedknots.com/anchor-hitch-knot" rel="nofollow">https://www.animatedknots.com/anchor-hitch-knot</a>; round turn & two half-hitches: <a href="https://www.animatedknots.com/round-turn-two-half-hitches-knot" rel="nofollow">https://www.animatedknots.com/round-turn-two-half-hitches-kn...</a><p>Angler's loop (sometimes called "perfection loop"): <a href="https://www.animatedknots.com/perfection-loop-knot" rel="nofollow">https://www.animatedknots.com/perfection-loop-knot</a>; alpine butterfly: <a href="https://www.animatedknots.com/alpine-butterfly-loop-knot" rel="nofollow">https://www.animatedknots.com/alpine-butterfly-loop-knot</a>.<p>Trucker's hitch (feat. alpine butterfly): <a href="https://www.youtube.com/shorts/o3BcaoPXK5Q" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/shorts/o3BcaoPXK5Q</a>; jam hitch (aka "rolling hitch zip tie" or "reverse midshipman's hitch"): <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/knots/comments/12vsuk1/how_to_tie_a_rolling_hitch_zip_tie/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/knots/comments/12vsuk1/how_to_tie_a...</a>. (Though these have "hitch" in the name, I'd argue they're better described as bindings, because they preserve tension.)<p>If nothing else, learn the round turn & two half hitches, the alpine butterfly, and the trucker's hitch. Some combination of these will serve you well in most situations.<p>One final tip, while I'm talking about knots. You may be tying your shoelaces wrong: <a href="https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/grannyknot.htm" rel="nofollow">https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/grannyknot.htm</a>.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 16:06:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819746</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819746</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819746</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "I'm skeptical about efforts to revolutionize schooling"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm glad you've experienced success with these strategies, but unfortunately you can't generalize that.<p>> They did not do phonics, they learned to read whole words from flashcards.<p>Whole language learning is a perfect example of this: The fifth word on the Wikipedia page for whole language is "discredited." [1] It's been linked to systemic regressions in literacy among children. Clever kids with lots of support can succeed <i>despite</i> whole language methods, but in general, whole language is significantly worse than phonics. I'm glad it worked for your kids — hands-on attention from a parent is an excellent way to learn :) — but in the classroom, it is empirically much worse than the alternatives.<p>[1]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_language" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_language</a><p>> The problem is that making them do stuff is the default, not the exception.<p>It is great for kids to be intrinsically motivated & I think the course material should be as engaging as possible, but often the kids are disengaged regardless, and I'm skeptical that there's some special trick we can pull to make the majority of kids passionate about fourth grade math class. A lot of them just won't be that interested in long division, and I think it's better to make learning a smooth and efficient experience than to jangle enrichment opportunities in front of their faces like cat toys. Alternative approaches always irritated the hell out of me as a kid. "Aren't you inspired? Don't you feel creative?" No! Just tell me what's going to be on the test and let me do the work!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 19:57:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48417391</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48417391</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48417391</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "I'm skeptical about efforts to revolutionize schooling"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh yeah I mean theoretically possible, not practical, haha.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:47:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48415894</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48415894</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48415894</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bccdee in "I'm skeptical about efforts to revolutionize schooling"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe in school as an opportunity for intellectual enrichment, but fostering interest is not the primary goal of schooling. It's nice if school can make your kid an engaged and passionate reader, but your kid <i>must</i> become literate—whether they want to or not. And frankly, until they can string a sentence together, interesting books aren't even on the table.<p>At some point, kids have to develop the discipline to do the things they need to do, whether they want to or not. Carrots are better than sticks, but in the real world there are a lot more sticks than carrots.<p>I was a passionate and interested kid. I had a lot of boring classes in high school, but I worked hard at them anyway, even when I didn't give a shit. I got good grades because I knew bad grades could jeopardize my future. That was my stick; kids who don't take that seriously might need a different one, but ultimately you can't keep them going with carrots forever. It's good if they can be intrinsically motivated, but kids often will not be, and they need to do things anyway.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 16:22:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48414705</link><dc:creator>bccdee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48414705</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48414705</guid></item></channel></rss>