[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_917?#Construction

>

> But if Meta is truly interested in prioritizing the safety of users [...]

Where did that "but" clause come from? Has that ever been a priority?

You're one of today's lucky 10,000! [0]

[0] https://xkcd.com/1053/

[0] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=524...

[1] https://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/emips/

[2] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/an-onli...

Not sure attracting attention to baby formula will have a positive outcome[0].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1977_Nestl%C3%A9_boycott

It made sense to somebody else[0], too.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DuckDuckGo

https://youtu.be/WpnM37A4P_8?si=SSRvgD4yvhAcdh0e

"A question is...". To my mind not the most important question, if one plays-out to a logical conclusion the scenario you're proposing.

> [...] if it's still a time saver, even with the increased review load, then it's a win, correct?

No - and that's bordering-on (if not fully) rude disrespect of reviewers time and effort. One way to think of this is in terms of Brandolinis Law[0]. Pushing work back to submitters is going to have to happen. Low-effort "submissions" are first and foremost "low-effort" - that's going to have to be driven home.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini's_law

I can't speak to how successful it is, but Daniel/Curl have been running with this model[0][1] for years. Probably not too different from 'drh and SQLite[2][3].

[0] https://curl.se/support.html

[1] https://rock-solid.curl.dev/

[2] https://sqlite.org/support.html

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49272832

[0] https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-release-9/src/sys/a...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Software_Distribution

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_(programming_language)

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix

The vestige I'm amused by on my (BSD) systems is .S files. "S" for "Source". From the time when "source code" meant "assembly". Python, zig, C++, C, etc would be invented later...

I'm in the same boat - I wanted to re-read, but couldn't find my copy of Neuromancer (which was a chore to get through the first time I read it years ago), so I've started Mona Lisa Overdrive - same thing. Everything is desribed in some dense street subculture patois or as some Sony or Mitsubishi future-product. I guess if the point is "things are recognizable, but this is now a well-established 'different' culture" - mission accomplished. As mentioned though it is a chore. An unrelenting chore. Once you're done though, it's satisfying to reflect on it.

> water is not unlimited

> you don't want to release a bunch of acid into a river

> I know next to nothing about this

> I know basically nothing

> corn is one of the thirstiest major crops grown in the US

What is this rant supposed to inform? Whats wrong with OP being concerned about the costs of operating a DC?

Is it time to bring Jony Ive back?? Have some backbone, Apple...

> that, rumor has it, includes all of the above and adds iOS too.

Ok, this snippy comment is for The Verge - what crack reporting got you the scoop that Apple would be releasing an iOS phone?

Maybe I just learned it’s ways, but I feel like I was ~satisfied with AltaVista… I think Google came to eat their lunch in part because they took search way more seriously than DEC did.