Why do we even need providers? Locally store the convos on each device and there's not a need for the server.

Hacker news has a doomscroll front page. Ive never notice you have a problem with it

Some people are scared of paedos talking to the kids, other people are scared the kids will watch bad videos, or read bad things. They are two distinct issues lumped in under the "social media" banner, and it can be hard to guess which issue a hysterical parent is referring too.

Hn is social media and even has a doomacrollint algorithm but because it's not classically considered to be akin to twitter, tiktok or Facebook it gets away with it

.... Is this trolling? Banning social media won't stop them accessing "horrible things", you'd need to disconnect the internet entirely from them, have you done that?

Why do you think social media is bad but somehow regular websites aren't horrible?

Sound reasoning lol some really hysterical folk on here.

if you actually believed it were that dangerous you wouldn't be literally on social media posting about this would you?

Bones take calcium from bones? Net effect 0 then?

It's because the drug is activating your reward centres, ideas are more likely to seem good etc. coke has a similar same effect.

> helping with depression Acid shrooms and the related mdma are all feel good drugs. Salvia on the other hand has no such feel good effect but is massively hallucinatory and perturbant. It helps with depression cos it's a feelgood drug.

Why do you think? Just watching a person off their tits on acid is unsettling if you've no idea whats caused it. And I would take LSD to "zone out", they aren't passive experiences like a joint, they are full day trips

But because of idol worship, he's a star on here

Do these knowledge jobs have a significant corpus of not only knowledge but discussion and problem solving, all conveniently labelled for the AI to train on? Probably not. Coding has stack overflow, what does, say, advertising use?

And the deposit. A bad faith actor could immediately default on their brand new mortgage and the bank would need to spend money going through the courts reclaiming then selling the house.... That simply costs money . The deposit covers that risk.

This is not to mention people burning a house down. Bank can hardly recoup the sale price from a burnt out husk.

If houses were such low risk assets, banks would be buying them. They wouldn't be selling you a shovel in a goldrush and letting you take all the risk