So now, all of it sits abandoned, no construction started, and now its not even worth building as they claim "down town is dead".

This is likely the fate of that land, a write off until its so valuable they can sell it to someone else.

Took the entire code review, put it into Claude and then responded in GitLab.

80% of the issues were trivial, only 1 was a minor problem. The post was like 10,000 characters long, including explaining the change.

Huge waste of everyones time.

In the cloud space it seems like AWS does nothing and wins.

That still seems like a simple CRUD app.

And it's pretty easy to customize which is nice.

Throw it in an auto-scale ECS cluster and you have something that goes from 100 students to 20k easy.

The model we operated on was we kept 50% of all cost savings that we attained for the hospital or health system, on a multi-year engagement. This was just supply chain management, cost optimization, manufacturer relations, pharmacy changes etc. No change in patient care.

The hospitals saved money, we made money, everyone left happy.

The types of deals from the article are more or less what happens when the leadership at a hospital gets bribed at golf, hire some consultant to come in and fire people and not hold anyone accountable for any negative outcomes.

I will never understand why any organization would sign a deal with a consultant and not require an outcome by the end of the engagement (in this case, cost savings). You are quite literally signing up to burn money.

Twice in my career the owners of a company have wanted to sue competitors for stealing their "product" after poaching our staff.

Each time, the lawyers came in and basically told us that suing them for copyright is suicide, will inevitably be nearly impossible to prove, and money would be better spent in many other areas.

In fact, we ended up suing them (and they settled) for stealing our copyrighted clinical content, which they copied so blatantly they left our own typos and customer support phone number in it.

Go ahead, try to sue over your copyrighted code, 10 years and 100M later you will end up like Google v Oracle. What if the code is even 5% different? What about elements dictated by external constraints; hardware, industry standards, common programming practices, these aren't copyrightable.

Then you have merger doctrine, how many ways can we really represent the same basic functions?

Same goes with the copyleft argument, "code resembling copyleft" is incredibly vague, it would need to be verbatim the code, not resembling. Then you have the history of copyleft, there have been many abuses of copyleft and only ~10 notable lawsuits. Now because AI wrote it (which makes it _even harder_ to enforce), we will see a sudden outburst of copyleft cases? I doubt it.

Ultimately anyone can sue you for any reason, nothing is stopping anyone right now from suing you claiming AI stole their copyleft code.

How many are we up to now? Has to be hundreds of them.

Again goes back to the "intern" analogy people like to make.

Do not use these, I can smell AI resumes from a million miles away and instantly discard them.

Best advice I have for people is hand write your resume in a visibly clean layout, and tailor it to the job. Do not use bots either because they make dumb mistakes like leaving markdown in, or submitting 15 seconds after the posting comes online.

We simply aren't getting effective policing, and technology isn't the solution.

Reality is cops have become police report writers, traffic accident helpers, and domestic abuse arbiters, that is over half the job.

Separately, I have a local camera repair shop and my friend told me its 2 months backlog to get your film based camera worked on.

Ultimately if the deal we get online is infinite tracking, infinite scrolling and infinite enshittification, real life start to sound a whole lot better.