<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: belZaah</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=belZaah</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:14:43 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=belZaah" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "Cooling in Space"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You just need to go north. Most of Finland requires massive amounts of heating for most of the year for industrial and residential purposes. If the math doesn’t add up there, I really can’t see how math for orbital data centers would add up.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 13:18:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526944</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526944</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526944</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "How to Earn a Billion Dollars"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why would you want to earn a billion dollars? You must have the maturity to handle the money. Hopefully you’ll mature sufficiently through the process of making that money but if the money’s fast, that might not happen. I’ve seen people get 9-figure rich overnight. Didn’t change them at all, they are still the wonderful folks they were. But I’ve also seen people drink themselves to death as it turns out a few mill in the bank does not answer the question “wtf do I do when I don’t have to do anything?”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 13:10:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526883</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526883</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526883</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "The Russian who invented semiconductors 25 years before the USA"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thus is the crime of the communist Russia: forcing millions into hard labor to die for progress yet squandering innovation for ideological reasons. But the same mechanism is there in, say, Microsoft. To get the attention of leadership, your idea must have 9 zeros at the very least. If it doesn’t, you either leave M$ or stay there and abandon your idea. But a 7-zero idea is a pretty expensive one to be abandoned.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 04:46:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431896</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431896</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431896</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "U.S. midterms have a cyber problem, but it's not at the ballot box"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>True. But in the physical world, ideas (or memes, if you will) are bound to people and can only survive, if the carrier survives. The idea of curing headaches with striking your head with a hammer does not spread, because the carrier dies. On the interweb, that connection is no longer there. An idea is independent and can spread without direct human involvement. We are like a tundra species finding itself in a rainforest: completely unprepared, lacking both immunity and the ability to keep up with the environment as it changes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 04:33:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48366096</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48366096</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48366096</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "How Claude Code works in large codebases"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly. So is that level of obvious hygiene where the bar is or is it somewhere else. What ticks me off is the audacity of blanket claims without an attempt to even remotely state why it’s said this is a list of successful patterns and what does success mean. We’re just supposed to eat it up, because, you know, Claude.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 04:51:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144696</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144696</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144696</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "How Claude Code works in large codebases"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How very interesting. In an industry, where things shift around in months if not weeks, there’s been not only enough time for clear patterns to emerge but also these patterns have proven successful on large codebases. What’s the success criteria? Didn’t delete production database? Team velocity has increased? Codebase TTL has increased? Operations guys are happier?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 04:32:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144586</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144586</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144586</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "The US is winning the AI race where it matters most: commercialization"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There used to be such a thing as profit. A return on investment. If your exit strategy is to get sold to Google, focusing on revenue is a perfectly fine strategy. If you _are_ the Google, however, the money poured in should eventually be made back. We seem to have forgotten that. The current level of commercialization just means the US is burning investments faster, than anyone else. Eventually this might change and the bet might pay off. But every minute this goes on, the expected payoff must be larger to pay for the loss made this minute as well as interest for the previous minutes. I’m not entirely sure this is what “winning” looks like. Tic-toc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 05:04:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131290</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131290</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131290</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "What I'm Hearing About Cognitive Debt (So Far)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s a general principle. Complexity breeds complexity via a multitude of mechanisms thus growing exponentially. As complexity is also related to cost, this means, that there are two limits approached exponentially: financial (we can no longer afford complexity) and cognitive (ee can no longer understand). In an ideal world, financial barrier arrives first, as it is necessary to understand something to make it constructively simple. If it doesn’t, the only solution is destructive simplification by simply breaking the system into pieces forcefully. This is what Musk did to X and tried to do to the US Government.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 04:58:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018224</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018224</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018224</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "CEOs admit AI had no impact on employment or productivity"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unlikely. There’s no change in operating profit per employee trends for major software companies like Alphabet since GenAI became a thing. But MS employees are now making 3 times more profit, than they were before Nadella took over. Clearly leadership can make a difference but there is no visible impact after several years of the technology being available. I can’t imagine a technology, that shows no economic impact at all while we figure it out. There ought to be _something_. Yes, big companies have inertia, but Nadella showed clear results in a year.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 05:08:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830585</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830585</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830585</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "The quiet disappearance of the free-range childhood"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My kids walk/bike to school, take public transport and are pretty free-range. But that’s absolutely nothing compared to my childhood. I was born in 1975. We dug up literal explosives from WWII and made our own small bombs (some matches, two large bolts…). Access to all sorts of chemicals was easy and we would set things on fire or just mix stuff to see what happens. Playing around on construction sites. Taking someones boat out to go fishing. Making bows and arrows, that would go straight through plywood. All _that_ is definitely gone. Some of it for good - kids loosing their fingers or worse was a common occurrence. So there definitely is a trend in case of me and my friends.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 05:25:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822012</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822012</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822012</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "IronGlass Brings Legendary Soviet Cinema Lenses to Mirrorless Cameras"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Soviets did not have two things the West did. Concern for quality and market forces to direct development focus. This means Soviet stuff varies amazingly between specimen and can sometimes be over-engineered in particular ways. Soviet optics had a specific visual style, but everyone ditched them as soon as alternatives became available as hunting for the ones not made on a Monday was just too tedious.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 05:49:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583226</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583226</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583226</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "The truth that haunts the Ramones: 'They sold more T-shirts than records'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Terrible in which way? Did not use counterpoint sufficiently elegantly? It’s punk, mate. Try to do a set downpicking like Johnny.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 04:43:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47526706</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47526706</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47526706</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "Why craft-lovers are losing their craft"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>An excellent analogy. Everyone is an expert in taking the photo. But this does not make them a photographer. Even that expert claim is actually not fully true, the phone camera is woefully inadequate in many ways. But the main difference between a photographer and a layman like myself is the ability to produce output strongly linked with clear artistic intent.<p>Writing code is not the hard part and never has been. The hard part is having a clear understanding of how to solve a specific complex problem and being able to express that intent in code. Getting a decently exposed image was never the hard part.<p>Finally, there’s no scaling issues with cameras. You just make them better until it stops making economic sense. This is not true with code. To make llms better, good human-made code is needed for training. Better llms lead to less human-made code being available. This means there’s not an exponential growth in quality but a S-curve with a balance point. I’d say we are already there: innovation is shifting from the models to the ways of harnessing the models.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 05:20:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474714</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474714</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474714</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "Skillfile, the declarative skill manager, now with search for 110K+ skills"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So it’s like code for execution via a llm or an interpreter? Have we invented source control yet?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:58:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47409151</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47409151</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47409151</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "Windows: Microsoft broke the only thing that mattered"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I used to manage NT-based infra back in the day, have been on a mac for 15 years now because of stuff like this. A few years ago I bought a Windows box for my daughter. Out of the box the clock was wrong and it would just hang on auto-update. No message, no logs anywhere, just hangs. A few years later the son comes of age and gets his own box. And it’s the same story, no automatic adjustment of the clock. I’m running a bog standard unifi network leading to fiber, nothing complicated, everything else works including all the windows laptops of my wife. But a basic standards-based library-supported Windows function.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 06:33:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47319727</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47319727</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47319727</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "Windows: Microsoft broke the only thing that mattered"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The weird thing is the way it’s trash. It breaks weird things no dev should ever have to touch. At one point Excel left horizontal lines on screen, when scrolling. Bullets and numbering just straight up refuses to restart numbering. It _worked_ why did you break it? Who gained what out of you breaking it?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 06:24:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47319675</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47319675</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47319675</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "Claude Code wiped our production database with a Terraform command"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s a broken analogy. An intern and a llm have completely different failure modes. An intern has some understanding of their limits and the llm just doesn’t. The thing, that looks remarkably human, will make mistakes in ways no human would. That’s where the danger lies: we see the human-like thing be better at things difficult for humans and assume them to be better across the board. That is not the case.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 07:20:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47285298</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47285298</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47285298</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "Labor market impacts of AI: A new measure and early evidence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t think the objections are not necessarily in terms of lack of productivity although my personal experience is not that of massive productivity increases. The fact that you are producing code much faster is likely just to push the bottleneck somewhere else. Software value cycles are long and complicated. What if you run into an issue in 5 years the LLM fails to diagnose or fix due to complex system interactions? How often would that happen? Would it be feasible to just generate the whole thing anew matching functionality precisely? Are you making the right architecture choices from the perspective of what the preferred modus operandi of an llm is in 5 years? We don’t know. The more experienced folks tend to be conservative as they have experienced how badly things can age. Maybe this time it’ll be different?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 07:10:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47271932</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47271932</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47271932</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "This system can go fuck itself and burn in hell"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m not sure you are familiar with the way some traditional communities treat, say, single mothers.<p>The system is, that if you make unfortunate choices (such as moving away from your support network and carrying your life savings where you can forget them) and do not have anything (such as skills or low morals) to compensate, life is going to be hard. That has always been the case, that will always be the case. What the consequential decisions are, differs. But the basic premise of “f around and find out” holds.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 06:40:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47214609</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47214609</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47214609</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belZaah in "Tove Jansson's criticized illustrations of The Hobbit (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hats off for going to the Primary Source!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 06:31:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47214559</link><dc:creator>belZaah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47214559</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47214559</guid></item></channel></rss>