<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: belleruches</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=belleruches</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=belleruches" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belleruches in "Coming Soon to Hacker News: Pending Comments"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's probably going to be for the better. My biggest concern though is that HN may become to clique-ish... Those with low karma that have interesting thoughts may now be discouraged from sharing...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 00:42:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7446191</link><dc:creator>belleruches</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7446191</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7446191</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belleruches in "Coming Soon to Hacker News: Pending Comments"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hey PG,<p>I think you're doing the right thing. I've watched HN start to turn into a place full of snark and very useless comments. This is a great measure, but is the 1000 points karma a high threshold for the endorsers? Why not 500 or 750?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 00:09:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445920</link><dc:creator>belleruches</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445920</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445920</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by belleruches in "It Is Time For Basic Income"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm in favor of this.<p>Do we have any examples where this has worked before?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 23:52:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445789</link><dc:creator>belleruches</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445789</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445789</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Project MINARET Illegally Monitors American ‘Subversives’ (1967)]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=civilliberties_107&printerfriendly=true">http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=civilliberties_107&printerfriendly=true</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445237">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445237</a></p>
<p>Points: 6</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 22:03:18 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=civilliberties_107&amp;printerfriendly=true</link><dc:creator>belleruches</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445237</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445237</guid></item></channel></rss>