See https://agentclientprotocol.com/overview/clients

I don't think this open debate you're talking about actually happens much on social media. At least, outside of a few select Subreddits, I've very rarely seen it.

Does buying YouTube not count?

On this subject specifically, see the records & tuples proposal (currently at stage 2): https://github.com/tc39/proposal-record-tuple

While nobody's fault, imho we'd have been much served by admitting that they're not comparable and doing something else (e.g. add an extra qualifier to the grade or something) than by trying to make them comparable and obviously and predictably failing at it.

This can also be explained by teachers assessments being an accurate representation of students ability, but students traditionally not faring as well in exams as their ability would suggest due to exam taking being an additional unrelated skill.

fwiw though, you only need to look at some of the outliers to see that the algorithm failed. It's all very well to say that it produced a consistent result in general, but each result specifically applies to an individual person so needs to be fair to each person as well as in general.

fwiw the name George in English can be applied to women as well as men (though only rarely I guess). See for example Famous Five books

This is a bad take. Hey is a subscription service. If you buy a magazine from a newsagent and then sign up to a subscription from it, the newsagent doesn't get to claim 30% of the subscription fee.

[1] https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/taxis-and-private-hire/licensing...

I'm not old enough to remember football hooliganism in the 80s and before, but abroad at least, it was very far from solved by the 90s - which is why passports are taken away.

> than all the security theatre prevented some atrocity

Without commenting on how effective any of this is, you won't hear about prevention because it isn't news.

It's worth pointing out that Tory MPs absolutely voted for him before Tory party members got the chance to, and that if MPs in general don't like him then they can vote to bring down the government whenever they like. Quite why non-Tory MPs should get to pick who leads the Tory party I have no idea.

Sure. Where you actually put stuff depends entirely on the complexity of what it is that you're building. If you have an async function that you need to use in several places then it makes sense to keep it separate. If you have several of these then maintaining a separate container component for each view component that needs access to these quickly becomes unmaintainable.

On the other hand, keeping them as separate functions and adding them in via redux `connect` syntax and `mapDispatchToProps` is simple and makes it clear what's going on. In this scenario, the `connect` higher-order-component acts like the container class, but it built up from separate parts depending on what you need.

> redux-thunk seems to encourage that you use it for everything

I don't think this is true. redux-thunk is a piece of middleware and that's pretty much it. It should be used however is most appropriate for your application and your particular use case. Keeping state inside components isn't always appropriate, but isn't always a bad thing either. If one is growing too complicated, then perhaps the other is more appropriate.

The benefit of redux-thunk (and there are obviously other alternatives that provide the same value) is that it lets you write plain functions that have nothing to do with the store, and nothing to do with components. If you put all your business logic into these plain functions, then they're really easy to test, reason about, move, refactor, etc.

> What drives people to put all of that into their store?

It's worth pointing out that redux-thunk doesn't move async code into your store. The store (i.e. reducers) is still completely synchronous.

Not that these doors aren't terrible design (they are), but notice how the stick figure is facing towards the handle when they open it, but the man in the image is facing away from the handle and reaching behind him to open it. If he turned around to face the other way before trying to open the door, he'd find it a lot easier.

The alternative to school was for girls to help out around the house until they were married off and for boys to either learn their father's trade and then do that for the rest of their lives or get apprenticed off to whoever could take them and then do _that_ for the rest of their lives.

School helps children create a life for themselves. If children don't learn anything there they'll find far fewer paths open to them later on.