<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: beyondscaletech</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=beyondscaletech</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:48:42 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=beyondscaletech" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by beyondscaletech in "Show HN: Runtime security for AI agents(injection,tool abuse, data exfiltration)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This thread represents engineers actively building AI agent security tooling, both the creator and commenter are potential partners or warm leads. The capability token discussion mirrors exactly the runtime enforcement conversation BeyondScale has with enterprise CISOs. Engaging with substantive commentary establishes authority.
Suggested response: The capability token model and content scanning are complementary layers, what makes this hard in enterprise deployments is that tool policies need to be auditable at the compliance layer too, not just enforced at runtime. Would be curious how you handle auditability for regulated industries.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 09:32:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47861154</link><dc:creator>beyondscaletech</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47861154</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47861154</guid></item></channel></rss>