<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: bg24</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=bg24</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 08:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=bg24" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "OpenAI models coming to Amazon Bedrock: Interview with OpenAI and AWS CEOs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While Anthopic has the best model and a focussed (no disturbance, lawsuits) leadership, they got a lot of enterprise access due to AWS. It is mutual no doubt, with both sides benefitting. The culture of feedback loop of AWS customers would have helped them in getting to enterprise-ready faster. Just my hypothesis.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:51:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47942416</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47942416</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47942416</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "John Ternus to become Apple CEO"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is a net positive to have a technologist and hardware leader at the helm. In this era, Apple can hire the right people to build software faster. but they need a strong hardware leader at the helm to differentiate themselves. In local AI, they have a unique opportunity, but limited window of time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 05:07:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844743</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844743</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844743</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "Claude Code Routines"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Think another way, these product features are easy to build in other harnesses too. And as the open source models and the other models which are much lower cost are getting better, there will be a time when it will be justified to have a harness that can work with many models and optimize your cost and efficiency.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 03:26:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47774349</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47774349</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47774349</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "Decisions that eroded trust in Azure – by a former Azure Core engineer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I read all 6 posts. OP is genuine and very talented. Unfortunate how foundational issues fall through the cracks in orgs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641877</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641877</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641877</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "My spicy take on vibe coding for PMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it depends on the company. In large companies, the role of PM probably won’t change that much. However, PMs who are technical and hands-on can bring significantly more value by leveraging AI tools.<p>There’s another path for PMs that the article and most of the comments don’t seem to mention.<p>Technical PMs are now in a great position to start their own companies. In the past, many were blocked or handicapped by the inability to code. With AI-assisted development, that barrier is much lower, which gives them a lot more leverage to build products themselves.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 04:47:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47243192</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47243192</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47243192</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "OpenAI raises $110B on $730B pre-money valuation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Lot of skepticism about OpenAI's survival. I am a user of both Claude (max) and Codex (plus). Some neutral points.<p>- Anthropic owes to AWS for their enterprise growth. Yes, their own talent as well.<p>- AWS investing for a purpose - solving problems with multi-agent systems - "exclusive third-party cloud distribution provider for OpenAI Frontier, which enables organizations to build, deploy, and manage teams of AI agents.". I think the multi-agent landscape will be production-ready in 2026 for solving really complex problems. AWS saw something in Codex and OpenAI's models.<p>- On Circular investments - if you make $100B of your revenue from ecosystem of players who spend $50B on your infra... where else would you go?<p>I work for another cloud provider, not AWS.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 03:10:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47189740</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47189740</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47189740</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "How will OpenAI compete?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If Codex 6.0 is better than Opus 4.9, things will flip. While OpenAI has too many common enemies and trying to box them into a consumer company, they are equally enterprise focused. They need to absolutely do well with foundation model - everything else depends on that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 08:37:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163499</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163499</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163499</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "Claude Code Remote Control"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Same here. So I have to resort to speaking elsewhere (notes app) and copying/pasting.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 14:23:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47151870</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47151870</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47151870</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused library OS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Would be nice to see an OCI runtime and if it can give high-performant I/O as opposed to other we have today (eg. Gvisor).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 19:16:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46916915</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46916915</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46916915</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "GPT-5.3-Codex"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Need to try OpenCode. Thanks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 20:16:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46904586</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46904586</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46904586</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "GPT-5.3-Codex"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You are correct :-) I am turned off by the fact that I will hit the limit if I used more. But you gave me confidence. I guess $20 can go a long way. I think only once in the last 3 months I got rate limited in Codex.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 20:16:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46904579</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46904579</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46904579</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "GPT-5.3-Codex"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am on a max subscription for Claude, and hate the fact that OpenAI have not figured out that $20 => $200 is a big jump. Good luck to them. In terms of model, just last night, Codex 5.2 solved a problem for me which other models were going round and round. Almost same instructions. That said, I still plan to be on $100 Claude (overall value across many tasks, ability to create docs, co-work), and may bump up OpenAI subscription to the next tier should they decide to introduce one. Not going to $200 even with 5.3, unless my company pays for it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 19:17:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46903739</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46903739</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46903739</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "Go ahead, self-host Postgres"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes. Also you can have these replicas of Postgres across regions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2025 10:54:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46343913</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46343913</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46343913</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "OpenAI are quietly adopting skills, now available in ChatGPT and Codex CLI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>With a little bit of experience, I realized that it makes sense even for agent to run commands/scripts for deterministic tasks. For example, to find a particular app out of a list of N (can be 100) with a complex filtering crietria, best option is to run a shell command to get specific output.<p>Like this, you can divide a job to be done into blocks of reasoning and deterministic tasks. The later are scripts/commands. The whole package is called skills.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 12:47:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46254170</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46254170</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46254170</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "OpenAI says over a million people talk to ChatGPT about suicide weekly"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are one-off things, and then there is exponential improvements - both in guardrails, and ChatGPT's ability to handle these discussions.<p>This type of discussion might be very much possible in ChatGPT in 6-24 months.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 14:24:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45733294</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45733294</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45733294</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "Claude for Excel"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"I don't trust LLMs to do the kind of precise deterministic work" => I think LLM is not doing the precise arithmetic. It is the agent with lots of knowledge (skills) and tools. Precise deterministic work is done by tools (deterministic code). Skills brings domain knowledge and how to sequence a task. Agent executes it. LLM predicts the next token.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 18:05:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45724331</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45724331</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45724331</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe yes. If so, that is great. But then why do we not see any damage to those countries either due to misinformation or any other hacks. On a related note, Snowden incident shows the depth of our ability.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 21:30:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43211474</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43211474</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43211474</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I find it difficult to comprehend if the billionaires do not know this. That if the Government slowly turns into an oligarchy with their help, the Government will eventually turns against them too. They cannot escape the punishment.<p>Humans (our leaders) have behavior that shows up when under stress or things do not go per their plan. Other countries are already noticing this about USA leaders and will not hesitate to exploit.<p>My prediction for the future, with a heavy heart.<p>- Feb/2026: China becomes #1 in technological progress. And America's relationship with former allies is irreversibly bad.<p>- 2027-29: Russia continues to pamper President Trump for another term. Their goal is to create anarchy in America. They succeed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 21:28:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43211416</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43211416</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43211416</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The amount of incompetence, incomprehensible ideology and red-tape slows everything down. NSA and CIA still look powerful because of huge amount of funds that flow in. Other countries happily hack into our infrastructure. You hardly hear NSA doing such accomplishments anymore (last was the Iranian nuclear hack). I doubt if America has any powerful spy network in places in Russia or China. But hey, I am just a dumb citizen.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 21:17:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43211150</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43211150</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43211150</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bg24 in "So you wanna write Kubernetes controllers?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is the point. Right tool for the job. Kubernetes was incubated at Google and designed for deployments at scale. Lot of teams are happily using it. But it is definitely not for startups or solo devs, unless you are an expert user already.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 06:42:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42838102</link><dc:creator>bg24</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42838102</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42838102</guid></item></channel></rss>