Early LLMs were trivially non-coherent. The stories it wrote should shift constantly. The story could start on the moon, then the character could drive to Madison, Wisconsin.

A more obvious way to see this is in video generators. If the "camera" turns 180° twice, we often look at a completely different scene.

Can current models write an entire coherent book? I don't know. I have never wanted to generate such a book. But "do I like this book" is not a good test for coherence.

A couple hundred years ago, something like 70% of the population worked in agriculture. Technology replaced almost all of these jobs.

So far, we have reimagined old professions and created brand new ones. Is this ability of ours limitless?

[1] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CMFj75kBQlU

From the privacy policy[1], "Our AI providers operate under Zero Data Retention (ZDR) agreements and retain none of your prompts or the responses they generate. America.gov’s own response cache is separate and is described in Section 5.

Our AI providers are contractually prohibited from selling your information, building an advertising profile, or training their AI models with your data."

[1] https://america.gov/privacy-policy

I don't see any of those terms. Not even on the signed in page to upgrade to to a different Pro plan.

The plans I see are labeled, "Pro 100", "Pro 200", and "Pro 500" with the number corresponding to the price in USD.

Does anyone see the usage limits? I don't see anything indicating how much usage is in each tier.

I checked:

* https://chatgpt.com/pricing/

* https://help.openai.com/en/articles/9793128-about-chatgpt-pr...

* https://chatgpt.com/#pricing (signed in plan upgrade page)

If:

1. The designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk is politically motivated

2. We collectively accept that is okay for the US President to bar all defense vendors and contractors from working with an American company for political reasons.

What defense related company(ies) would a Democratic President have political reasons to ban?

It has been reported that Palantir and its founder have a history of political contributions to the Republican party.

Instead of Republican presidents driving left leaning companies out of defense and Democratic presidents driving right leaning companies out of defense, it would be better if neither party used supply chain risk as a political weapon.

In terms of purely local LLMs, one can run GLM 5.3 flash on a beefy workstation.

[1] https://openrouter.ai/z-ai/glm-5.3

However, the pawn was defended by the queen and it took a forced queen trade to unlock the move.

I have seen much worse blunders from human players. And, I have made much worse blunders.

I would say this did a really good job of playing chess. It moved the pieces consistently and traded pieces when required.

This is worlds away from the frontier ~1 year ago where models would hallucinate pieces into existence.

>Live Rewind, which can help users recall what was just said in conversation. A double press of the Digital Crown shows the previous 15 seconds of a conversation as a text snippet...Users can ask Siri about the content of the text or save it to the Siri app to revisit later.

Making the first folding iPhone a two fold format is a very prudent decision.

[1] https://www.samsung.com/us/smartphones/galaxy-z-trifold/

"Siri Recap" records throughout the day without the user needing to constantly enable it. It provides AI summaries of the recorded conversations including direct quotes.

"Live Rewind" shows an exact transcript of conversation but only of the 15 seconds immediately before the user activated it.

Siri Recap records throughout the day without the user needing to constantly enable it. It provides AI summaries of conversations recorded including direct quotes.

Live Rewind shows an exact transcript of conversation but only of the 15 seconds immediately before the user activated it.

I am not a lawyer but I do not believe that is true in any state except Nevada. Two-party consent almost always includes in person conversations. California Code, Penal Code 632:

>A person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, uses an electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop upon or record the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per violation, or imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year

https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-632/