<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: big85</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=big85</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 00:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=big85" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "VPN ban update for UK households as government looks at 'age-gate'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Most VPN companies won't implement age verification, because their purpose is privacy. This is really an attempt to ban VPNs. This won't be popular when 70% of the population uses VPNs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 16:56:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610781</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610781</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610781</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "VPN ban update for UK households as government looks at 'age-gate'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>UK government has been talking about digital ID for a while now. The existing verification methods are too vulnerable to cheating (fake beards, fake ID, borrow dad's credit card, etc...), so the logical next step is direct government ID numbers. The goal is to link all online activity to a unique identifier to make it easier to punish dissent.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 16:47:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610694</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610694</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610694</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "VPN ban update for UK households as government looks at 'age-gate'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>  You don’t. You can’t. So everyone gets carded.<p>Exactly. A little at a time. First it's adult sites, because if you need to show ID to buy alcohol, shouldn't you need ID to buy pornography? Once that's accepted, expand the sphere of control to non-adult sites too by redefining everything as 16+.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 16:43:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610642</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610642</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610642</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "Think of the children: How to force real ID for all internet traffic (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I suspect something like this is on the way, in the long term. Every site has some Cloudflare captcha or the like to guard against the AI scraper bots. Eventually, we may need some kind of token which is only issued to real humans.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 01:42:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48605459</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48605459</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48605459</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "Think of the children: How to force real ID for all internet traffic (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><meta name="RATING" content="RTA-5042-1996-1400-1577-RTA" /><p>I wonder why the rating code is so complex. Pornhub.com has this code enabled, but it also uses a simpler <meta name="rating" content="adult">. 4chan also uses the latter.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 23:33:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604595</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604595</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604595</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "The UK's new under-16 social media ban will cause more harm than it prevents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We have parental controls on devices. The change forced by the UK government is to give control to corporations, instead of the parents.<p>Parents are much better at knowing their own kid's age than corporations are. Teens keep fooling the age verification (pointing the camera at a video game character, using fake ID, even drawing beards on their face with a pen). But they aren't going to fool their own mother, and they don't need to trust ID verification startup with photographs of everbody's teenage kids to do it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 22:36:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604107</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604107</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604107</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "The UK's new under-16 social media ban will cause more harm than it prevents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>About 2 million adults in the UK don't have government-issued photo ID. Certainly many 16-17 year olds will have trouble verifying their age. They're blocking huge sectors of the UK population from being able to use the internet normally.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 22:31:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604053</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604053</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604053</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "From Australia to Europe, countries move to curb children's social media access"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Indeed. I don't see why the verification process has to be done <i>once per user per website</i>, instead of <i>once per user</i>. That maximizes costs, inconvenience, privacy risks, and compliance failures.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:36:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48599117</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48599117</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48599117</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "From Australia to Europe, countries move to curb children's social media access"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is bizarre, then, because the on-device Apple system just enables the existing parental controls by default, while the online verification systems are easily cirvumvented.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:29:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48599047</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48599047</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48599047</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "From Australia to Europe, countries move to curb children's social media access"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's still the issue of how to verify the user to give them that 1 bit. The current tools do not trust the user or the user's device, because the user could lie or modify the software on their device. But once my ID leaves the device, it becomes a privacy issue. You also have the problem that every pre-2026 device no longer functions with any site that requires the 1 bit.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:31:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48598372</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48598372</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48598372</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "From Australia to Europe, countries move to curb children's social media access"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Then enable parental controls on your children's devices. But don't enable it on my device, because I'm an adult.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:26:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48598311</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48598311</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48598311</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "UK considers putting age limits on VPNs to help enforce social media ban"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The actual goal, of course, is to create pretext to ban VPN services which don't ID their customers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 12:40:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48597904</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48597904</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48597904</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "From Australia to Europe, countries move to curb children's social media access"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Quite right. Around 2 million UK adults don't have photo ID, mostly concentrated among poorer and less educated people, and many of those have difficulty getting credit card for the same reason. The UK is violating their basic ECHR rights to freedom of speech, freedom of assocation, and the peaceful enjoyment of their property, and it's unnecessary because we already have parental controls.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 12:39:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48597890</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48597890</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48597890</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "Zork name origin got an update on Wikipedia"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah, but there are plenty of folk etymologies which, although they make a lot of logical sense, aren't true.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 23:53:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48593187</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48593187</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48593187</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "UK Even Wants Image Scanners on Unsupported Devices"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>(For what it's worth, I don't get that sense.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 20:28:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591075</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591075</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591075</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "UK Even Wants Image Scanners on Unsupported Devices"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> On-device nudity detection relies on machine-learning models that lean on the dedicated silicon built into recent phones, and older devices lack the neural processing and memory to run that kind of model without wrecking battery life and speed.<p>I'm beginning to suspect Apple complied in advance because their new devices have image-recognitions technology, but their competitors don't (particularly old hand-me down devices). Build a safety feature, have it made mandatory, and leverage the government to outlaw your competitors!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 19:57:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48590666</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48590666</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48590666</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "Microsoft new Outlook takes 10 seconds to do what Outlook Classic does instantly"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I hear the CPU fan spins up when you hit the Start menu now.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 14:43:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48586197</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48586197</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48586197</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "The UK's Teen Social Media Ban Is Political Theater, Not Child Safety Policy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We have a solution for that: parental controls. The new feature is that parental controls are <i>enabled by default</i> and cannot be disabled without the phone manufacturer's consent. The upcoming feature is that this also applies to non-adult sites like Facebook and YouTube. It's nothing less than the end of the free, open, and anonymous internet.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 01:43:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48564716</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48564716</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48564716</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "MPs and peers slam YouTube over tube ads blaming parents for kids' screen time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> YouTube has angered MPs and peers by bombarding them with adverts that suggest it is up to parents rather than tech companies to restrict teenagers’ screen time.<p>On a daily basis they've got a new idea to mess with our devices. Will users have to pass ID verification to avoid <i>screen time</i> limits too? Why is everything that used to be Parental Controls being made mandatory?<p>I have to get off this site before the tech news gives me an aneurysm. Let me give a prediction. To access the internet at all, you will need ID linked to government identity by some kind of token, the goal being to make it impossible post anything that can't be tracked to an individual. A bunch of major services are going to abandon the UK entirely to avoid the paperwork, but it won't matter.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:38:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484822</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484822</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484822</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big85 in "AI Will Not Start a Nuclear War, but Humans Might"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker</i> is about this idea. Set during the Cold War, the theory is that no human will choose nuclear retaliation if attacked, since it means mutual annihilation. However, American nuclear doctrine at the time assumes the threat of retaliation is the only thing deterring an attack. They attempt to solve this by building an AI which will retaliate, but are baffled when it too refuses to return fire.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 23:45:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48469361</link><dc:creator>big85</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48469361</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48469361</guid></item></channel></rss>