<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: big_toast</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=big_toast</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:08:16 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=big_toast" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "HN seems dead compared to say 10-15 years ago"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>pg had his 'pending comments'[0] a long time ago.<p>I think you work so hard for everyone here. Maybe it's a kind of cultural gardening.<p>[0]:<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445761">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7445761</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 22:04:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48452932</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48452932</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48452932</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "NASA's X-59 Aircraft Flies Supersonic for First Time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"... display shows Mach 1.07, but the aircraft is actually at Mach 1.0. The difference comes from the system's calibration" (from the youtube description)<p>What causes something like that? I assume it's related to the speed of sound being dependent on measurements local to the aircraft? I guess I assumed off the shelf devices would already cover this?<p>Also, I was kinda hoping the first video they released for this would be a little more elaborate. Maybe I'm getting spoiled by the elaborate youtube industry springing up around covering space and tech. Still glad they're releasing news + video so frequently.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 21:10:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48452124</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48452124</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48452124</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "The MQ-28 Ghost Bat Is Now Flying in the U.S."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are there any autonomous air freight companies?<p>Not the zipline style last mile delivery, but something larger. Seems like there's suddenly a lot of autonomous military aircraft, but I haven't really heard about civilian cargo aircraft.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 18:24:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327241</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327241</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327241</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The MQ-28 Ghost Bat Is Now Flying in the U.S.]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://theaviationist.com/2026/05/28/the-mq-28-ghost-bat-is-now-flying-in-the-u-s/">https://theaviationist.com/2026/05/28/the-mq-28-ghost-bat-is-now-flying-in-the-u-s/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327043">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327043</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 18:12:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://theaviationist.com/2026/05/28/the-mq-28-ghost-bat-is-now-flying-in-the-u-s/</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327043</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327043</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "Japan rail flow: passenger throughput per segment"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Kinda cool to see the rail flow as arteries of a region. Would love to see for all transportation systems (freeways, freight, air, etc).<p>The other maps are pretty cool too: <a href="https://anita.garden/projects/" rel="nofollow">https://anita.garden/projects/</a><p>Regions of one/ten million people: [asia], [north america], [world]<p>[asia]:<a href="https://anita.garden/asia1mloc/" rel="nofollow">https://anita.garden/asia1mloc/</a><p>[north america]:<a href="https://anita.garden/na1m/" rel="nofollow">https://anita.garden/na1m/</a><p>[world]:<a href="https://anita.garden/world10mfull/" rel="nofollow">https://anita.garden/world10mfull/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 18:12:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313085</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313085</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313085</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "Moon Base"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I entirely missed this game and meme. It's well reviewed on steam. But the comments are all either "this is literally the most boring game I think I've ever played", "true masterpiece", or more of this meme. So I'm guessing the reviews aren't serious, but was there more to it?<p>---<p>For other out-of-the-loop people, NASA published/funded the game Moonbase Alpha[0], developed by the Army Game Studio and was going to make an MMO called Astronaut: Moon, Mars and Beyond circa 2010? What an era.<p>[0]:<a href="https://store.steampowered.com/app/39000/Moonbase_Alpha/" rel="nofollow">https://store.steampowered.com/app/39000/Moonbase_Alpha/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 18:52:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284151</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284151</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284151</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[NASA Moon Base]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/moonbase/">https://www.nasa.gov/moonbase/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283997">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283997</a></p>
<p>Points: 6</p>
<p># Comments: 4</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 18:42:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.nasa.gov/moonbase/</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283997</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283997</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ferrari Luce: Engineering]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.ferrari.com/en-EN/auto/ferrari-luce-engineering">https://www.ferrari.com/en-EN/auto/ferrari-luce-engineering</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271763">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271763</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 21:15:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.ferrari.com/en-EN/auto/ferrari-luce-engineering</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271763</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271763</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "How to convert between wealth and income tax"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe some of Ray Madoff's points are that the tax code and most tax intuitions kinda differ.<p>There's the idea that "wealth" gains tend to not be taxed for a variety of reasons. The common parlance of "Buy, Borrow, Die" category things. The "step-up in basis" category things - i.e. no capital gains tax realized on lots of inherited wealth. (The inheritance tax might trigger in some cases, but oddly the capital gains tax often might not be triggered on transferred assets because they were never sold and the new possessor will be taxed at the stepped up received value if they ever sell. So there's a chunk of appreciation that never received capital gains taxation.) Trust related things.<p>There's the idea that 501(c)(4)s allow wealth to be transferred untaxed while retaining control over the assets (particularly because those organizations can engage in political activity, but I'd guess generally some of the organizations exert lots of influence/prestige.)<p>So perhaps OP is suggesting that maybe there's some fungibility in income tax % and wealth tax %, but when you look at the tax code the equivalency looks pretty weak currently.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 16:32:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238163</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238163</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238163</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "SpaceX S-1"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Mr. Musk or his affiliates may become aware, from time to time, of certain business opportunities ... and may direct such opportunities to other businesses in which they have invested."<p>"Under our charter, Mr. Musk and his affiliates are not restricted from owning assets or engaging in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us"<p>Pg. 56<p>I think this part is interesting considering Tesla shareholders seem to have lost out on developing (x)AI (AGI?) internally.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 22:41:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215304</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215304</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215304</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "SpaceX S-1"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is there any risk to SpaceX that the Musk brand pulls the market cap too far ahead now?<p>It's not a risk factor I see in the prospectus but seems plausible to me.<p>Just like with the AI company vesting, I imagine a scenario where a company seeds its own competition by realizing the monetary gains before the work is done. Maybe there's precedent in the dot com bubble. Certainly people were able to sell before the dip a la Cuban and broadcast.com. But I'm thinking more more specifically inducing competitive space ventures.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 22:29:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215149</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215149</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215149</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "OpenAI Adopts Google's SynthID Watermark for AI Images with Verification Tool"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The paper references some threat models they considered. They suggest someone might "possess paired information (both original and watermarked content)" and therefore be able to undo watermarking. Presumably it's fairly easy to get identity operations out of image APIs that would result in this situation. I'm not sure that addresses echelon's main concerns though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 22:58:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200793</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200793</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200793</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "OpenAI Adopts Google's SynthID Watermark for AI Images with Verification Tool"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I guess the SynthID-Image paper from Oct 2025[0] was an encoder-decoder for which they tested checking a flag or a 136 bit payload in 512x512 images and the watermark's robustness after various transformations.<p>Presumably the deployed version is meaningfully different.<p>[0]:<a href="https://arxiv.org/html/2510.09263v1" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/html/2510.09263v1</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 21:54:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200194</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200194</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200194</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "OpenAI Adopts Google's SynthID Watermark for AI Images with Verification Tool"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What information is included in the metadata or SynthID? How many bits can be encoded in a SynthID?<p>Can it be used to create something like nutritional labels for synthetic content? 10% synthetic text, 30 synthetic images.<p>Your reality was 15% synthetic today (75% mega corp, 25% open-weight neocloud).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 20:48:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199400</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199400</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199400</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "Elon Musk has lost his lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Musk leaves the board in 2018 I think. And something happens in DX-754 where they've pivoted to AI in SpaceX around then too. I had a lot of trouble telling what "AI" meant in late 2017 at Tesla.<p>---<p>Sept 1, 2017 DX-669: Funding paused confirmation. Elon is still on the board for a while. DX-707 specifies the board  as of Sept 26, 2017, and even suggests adding Shivon, Jared, Sam Teller.<p>Jan 31, 2018 DX-748: Elon is still discussing things with Greg. Elon: "The only paths I can think of are a major expansion of OpenAI and a major expansion of Tesla AI. Perhaps both simultaneously"<p>Feb 3, 2018 DX-754: Sam Teller says Elon "just suggested we use SpaceX email for AI stuff so switching over to that"<p>Feb 4, 2018 DX-755: Sam Teller and Shivon Zilis discuss disabling Openai<p>Feb 20, 2018 DX-770: Elon officially leaves board (first document I see specifying)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 19:55:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184703</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184703</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184703</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reddit Is (Mostly) Shuttering R/All, but There's Still a Way to Access It]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://lifehacker.com/tech/reddit-is-mostly-shutting-down-r-all?test_uuid=zXnWOLjQQwkYjMVwrvo5w&test_variant=B">https://lifehacker.com/tech/reddit-is-mostly-shutting-down-r-all?test_uuid=zXnWOLjQQwkYjMVwrvo5w&test_variant=B</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130616">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130616</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 03:03:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://lifehacker.com/tech/reddit-is-mostly-shutting-down-r-all?test_uuid=zXnWOLjQQwkYjMVwrvo5w&amp;test_variant=B</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130616</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130616</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "Referer Reality"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I love Robin's newsletters (and the books etc) and love "opinionated operator decisions make the internet go round".<p>Maybe I'm missing something but it seems like if i go gmail -> via a Robin Sloane Newsletter -> webpage, it seems generally useful to know Robin sent me. Like a backlink that's been liberated?<p>Is something different happening?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 15:59:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123644</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123644</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123644</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "OpenClaw Had a Rough Week"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>People need a mental bucket for 'stochastic software' for a while. Or hot mess, a fast food meal that you can expect to mostly be bad in some sense, but serves a purpose, and can be really good in that case.<p>Conflating the new style of agent-driven/vibe coded software with the old more predictable software leads to applying wrong heuristics/expectations.<p>People have a pretty good mental model of different types of meals they'll have in a year, and modulate their expectations by context. I think there's room for a new type of software that operates on different principles. Peter has mostly been clear what type of software he's developing. And if it ever converges to bug free, that's great, but I think some of his motivation is to figure out what this new software is. While not giving the users food poisoning.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:13:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056820</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056820</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056820</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "Multi-stroke text effect in CSS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ya! So many posts with clear presentations of css/svg/canvas.<p>The Daily Sketch series or 'CSS Animation with offset-path' are equally fun.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:22:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037296</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037296</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037296</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by big_toast in "Y Combinator's Stake in OpenAI (0.6%?)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The AI bothered me less, but I got a little frustrated with less than substantive comments on the front page.<p>Oddly I made an extension* to use the site more the way I wanted and now I find it a little easier to get a higher SNR past the front page and am enjoying that. I didn't really get past post rank 60 for two decades and now generally get much further.<p>*(It's basically vim-keys support for basically two functions. A function to "highlight" stories/comment threads I think will be promising and then hide function for the rest.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:11:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026306</link><dc:creator>big_toast</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026306</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026306</guid></item></channel></rss>