<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: biggerben</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=biggerben</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 13:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=biggerben" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by biggerben in "Chopping up books when they're physically too big"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s the jaunty howdy-doody tone whilst describing acts of desecration that gets me.<p>My wife assumed it must have been a joke post!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 09:46:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49724095</link><dc:creator>biggerben</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49724095</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49724095</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by biggerben in "Gallium oxide electronics withstand extreme cold"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Original paper: <a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c06155?ref=article_openPDF" rel="nofollow">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c06155?re...</a><p>The scale is micrometer sizes… I wonder what the limits for shrinking are?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 07:41:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47945258</link><dc:creator>biggerben</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47945258</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47945258</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by biggerben in "An AI Agent Published a Hit Piece on Me – The Operator Came Forward"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Totally agree. Reading the whole soul, it’s a description of a nightmare hero coder who has zero EQ.<p><pre><code>  > But I think the most remarkable thing about this document is how unremarkable it is. Usually getting an AI to act badly requires extensive “jailbreaking” to get around safety guardrails.

</code></pre>
Perhaps this style of soul is necessary to make agents work effectively, or it’s how the owner like to be communicated with, but it definitely looks like the outcome was inevitable. What kind of guardrails does the author think would prevent this? “Don’t be evil”?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 07:03:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47084679</link><dc:creator>biggerben</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47084679</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47084679</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by biggerben in "Total surface area required to fuel the world with solar (2009)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nitpick: if you’re trying to illustrate sizes of things, you should use an equal-area map projection.<p>The Southern Ocean wind installation is to the right scale or not?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 06:19:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46931797</link><dc:creator>biggerben</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46931797</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46931797</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by biggerben in "Zig's New Writer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder if making this change will improve design of buffering across IO implementers because buffering needs consideration upfront, rather than treatment as some feature bolted on the side?<p>It’s a good sacrifice if the redesign, whilst being more complicated, is avoiding an oversimplified abstraction which end up restricting optimisation opportunities.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 06:49:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44613170</link><dc:creator>biggerben</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44613170</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44613170</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by biggerben in "Dr John C. Clark, a scientist who disarmed atomic bombs twice"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not to be confused with Dr John Cooper Clarke, expert in disarming poetry.<p><a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hkH9BHS-ph4" rel="nofollow">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hkH9BHS-ph4</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 06:42:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44133568</link><dc:creator>biggerben</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44133568</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44133568</guid></item></channel></rss>