You don't have to wish, in this scenario. Bluesky supports third-party clients, you can use one that has a more minimal featureset if you prefer.

If I was evaluating frameworks for shipping a native app, the UI of this IDE would give me pause...

If AI cannot provide the same baseline promises while only bring right a fraction of the time, then it's not the right solution. I don't want my car's AC to ask Anthropic what the right temperature is; it's a waste of tokens that isn't optimizing jack shit 99.99% of the time. If a system isn't failing currently, then it's probably in the same boat as car ACs. Shoehorning AI into it won't solve anything.

If you try to bring the axe down on all CUDA devices, you'll still struggle to stop China from exporting their warehouses of Nvidia Tegra boards. Or stop Nintendo Switches from being jailbroken to run CUDA drivers. It's a no-win situation like saying you found Intel/Texas Instruments chips in a missile.

A) Let AI override safety mechanisms (increases uptime while endangering humans)

B) Let AI impose additional safeties (decreases uptime with questionable safety uplift)

If you intend to go with option B) then there's basically zero benefit to investing in that kind of automation. AGI will be fallible, and even with all the safeties and safeguards it's hard to see what tangible benefit AGI would add to the system. It'll be a hard sell for critical infrastructure of any kind.

I understand that it's hard to get a man to understand something when his AGI Society executive credentials depend on it, but it feels glaringly obvious why AI isn't masterminding these sorts of systems. Even accounting for unprecedented advancement in AI, it's hard to see what AI could contribute to managing these things.

You are the only person here conflating those groups.

Cui bono, from this type of brinkmanship?

Really, the "big AI story" will be when the next Snowden defects from the NRO and tells us what SENTIENT is doing. Until then it's just going to be a bunch of pie-in-the-sky wishcasting about what we want the future to look like. It's getting a little tiring hearing people insist that abundance is around the corner while surveillance is here-and-now.

What do you think happened? RISC-I and RISC-II never existed, ARM means "Automated Reasoning Mechanism" and the ISA was never RISC whatsoever?

Talk about nonsense, damn...

It's sad, but it was also wildly successful. RISC-V has already replaced ARM in highly-custom embedded spaces like Nvidia's GPU controllers, and it likely won't stop unless ARM finally changes their tune vis-a-vis licensing.

Do you live in a world where farming, mining, refining, manufacturing, managing, policing, politicking, QA testing, investing, bartering and advertising are all completely automated?

If you automated all of those things, there would be so much room for disruption that the AI wouldn't be able to maintain dominance.

Hersh's best work since unveiling Abu Ghraib. Highly recommend it over the super-spy biographies, especially since Hersh didn't have to go through Israel's Military Censor like Bergman did.

Even the fastest Apple Silicon chips like the M5 Max and the M3 Ultra still put up worse GPU compute performance than last-gen laptop RTX 4080 chips. And they don't scale, the largest M3 Ultra cluster you can configure is still ~2,000x smaller than a DGX SuperPOD. There's a reason Apple discontinued their rackmount hardware, there's very little demand for Apple Silicon in the datacenter.

AI, pollution, eminent domain and global warming will all outlast you.

> Today is the Terminator AI moment.

Try mid 1990s, the earliest deployment of autonomous-kill weapons like the Patriot System and CBU-97 SFW.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45530497

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44203174

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41093016

If you shorted Nvidia back when you started complaining, you would not be any richer or better-off today. I'm not an AI maxi, but you've let your own emotions poison your understanding of the AI market segment.