Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243293

Points: 197

# Comments: 63

If you're at all worried about being targeted for political speech or you're part of a targeted group, then you need to be more careful. This map is a bit outdated, but it does give some insight on who to avoid [1].

Ironically, Mullvad is one of the more trustworthy VPNs out there and still the one I'd recommend.

[0]: https://www.koi.ai/blog/urban-vpn-browser-extension-ai-conve...

[1]: https://windscribe.com/blog/the-vpn-relationship-map/

The Android app casting does sound amazing though and that alone would make a full on Linux machine with MBP level build quality compelling.

These are actual quotes from support:

> Upon checking, I see that the storage is showing as 0 bytes, because of the upgrade that has been done from business standard to business plus. Not to worry as this is very normal.

> I understand your concern and how important it is for the storage to be updated due to the business requirements. > > To give you full transparency into what is happening: when a Workspace subscription is upgraded, our backend systems must first detach your previous Business Standard storage allocation before provisioning the new Business Plus limits. During this transition window, the quota temporarily defaults to zero.

> Now please turn ON user storage limit nor shared drive storage limit. Once you turn ON, please wait for 5 minutes and then please turn it OFF.

^ That last attempt to try to force storage quotas to reset faster didn't work, btw. Still took hours.

But I agree that Delve is a special case and should naturally be held to a higher standard here because their whole business is around being compliant with the law. When most other startups break the law, they do it to get an advantage over competition. Delve did it in a way that sacrificed their core value towards customers.

XCode is usually the first example that comes to mind of a terrible native app in comparison to the much nicer VSCode.

After covid, it was never the same. Open for shorter windows, closed on Sundays, reduced selection, no more meal kits etc.

I had many friends who worked on Amazon Go, so it's a bit sad to see that work come to an end.

AI code review does not replace human review. But AI reviewers will often notice little things that a human may miss. Sometimes the things they flag are false positives, but it's still worth checking in on them. If even one logical error or edge case gets caught by an AI reviewer that would've otherwise made it to production with just human review, it's a win.

Some AI reviewers will also factor in context of related files not visible in the diff. Humans can do this, but it's time consuming, and many don't.

AI reviews are also a great place to put "lint" like rules that would be complicated to express in standard linting tools like Eslint.

We currently run 3-4 AI reviewers on our PRs. The biggest problem I run into is outdated knowledge. We've had AI reviewers leave comments based on limitations of DynamoDB or whatever that haven't been true for the last year or two. And of course it feels tedious when 3 bots all leave similar comments on the same line, but even that is useful as reinforcement of a signal.

To go back to your question around why people still use these workarounds on top of git, it's because the CLI is just one piece of it. With Graphite, I also get a stack-aware merge queue and review dashboard.