Being a US ally has become meaningless, and using a company that’s not targeted today does nothing to protect you tomorrow.

"The selection of tier-2 metropolitan areas shows that overall, they are growing faster than market average. Madrid and Milan are clearly taking the lead and are both able to attract the biggest additional investments. It can safely be said that they are on their way to becoming additional tier-1 locations."

https://www.eudca.org/documents/content/ZlZXb4bRSRefaEVqya2I... (downloads a pdf)

> Trust in me

No, because being Italian doesn't mean you know anything about this. Most Italians think the primary Italian exports are mozzarella and tomatoes.

The equivalent would be blaming those who chose the current president. Which would be an entirely reasonable thing to do.

Is it actually AI-related cost restructuring, or did they simply hire too many people? They will obviously prefer to tell a story about AI rather than bad management.

For the EU, Visa and Mastercard dependence form a duopoly controlled by a hostile foreign power. An alternative is essential.

Personal choices matter. See the amount of energy used on air conditioning in the US compared to areas of Europe with comparable weather for a banal example. If we want to significantly reduce emissions it will happen through a combination of personal choices, corporate action and government policy.

Looking on Google the closest I can find to your claim is the NTSB chair saying it might not be related after she gave out the details of the previous warning lights (as you'd expect in her position before the investigation has completed).

Maybe the actions of Alaska Airlines were absolutely fine, but the CEO passing all the blame to Boeing before the incident report is understandable, but a little off to me.

Boeing absolutely deserve every single bit of the criticism they get for the Max, but it's worth keeping in mind that in this instance Alaska possibly share some of the responsibility for flying an aircraft with known issues.

Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67909417

e.g. https://www.reddit.com/r/UKPersonalFinance/s/X2qBxazYm6

Anything that's not the current American culture wars? The same things most people talk about in their lives when not throthing at the mouth on Twitter. (i.e. comedy, sports, tech, food, animals, jobs, cars, etc.)

And, of course, culture wars will still be discussed, but it doesn't need promoting to those not interested in arguing such things on social media.

I don't know, I'm in Europe, I follow zero explicitly political people yet US politics dominates my Twitter feed. I don't get that on Instagram which is all I need to make the service more enjoyable and to feel less toxic than Twitter. The outrage town hall will of course continue on Threads, but hopefully with only those who are activley seeking it.

> Mr Zuckerberg said keeping the platform "friendly... will ultimately be the key to its success".

> But Mr Musk responded: "It is infinitely preferable to be attacked by strangers on Twitter, than indulge in the false happiness of hide-the-pain Instagram."

If Threads is a fractionally less toxic version of Twitter, it’ll do quite well.