<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: blepblep</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=blepblep</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=blepblep" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blepblep in "Stinkpot: SQLite-backed shell history"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For me the killer feature of atuin is that it allows searching the history of commands executed from the current working directory. Typically I have 10,000 plus commands in history but only a few in the current directory and I tend to run the same complex commands from the same directory.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 08:12:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49055847</link><dc:creator>blepblep</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49055847</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49055847</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blepblep in "Stop using RSA (2019)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not to say I agree with that comment. But I think the case for why ECC would be easier to break than RSA using quantum computing is that key sizes of ECC are much smaller so would require less qbits to break.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 07:24:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25023832</link><dc:creator>blepblep</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25023832</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25023832</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blepblep in "That company whose name used to contain HTML script tags Ltd"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Will that even work without <a href="http://" rel="nofollow">http://</a> or at least // in front of the domain name?<p>Tried it in chrome and sees it as a file name on the current domain.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 19:22:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24923018</link><dc:creator>blepblep</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24923018</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24923018</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blepblep in "Show HN: Strongweek, an iOS app focused on weeks months and years, not due dates"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This gets close but I don’t think it will then allow you to easily see which of these periodic tasks you can work when you have a few hours to spare today.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:24:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24591462</link><dc:creator>blepblep</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24591462</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24591462</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blepblep in "Show HN: Strongweek, an iOS app focused on weeks months and years, not due dates"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Can U suggest a feature that I’ve been looking for in a TODO app for a long time. Tasks that are periodic but not urgent. Like changing the filters on your heating system every 6 months, adding fertilizer to the garden every 3 months, etc. Then when you have some time to spare you can easily see these kinds of tasks that you normally forget.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:57:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24591152</link><dc:creator>blepblep</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24591152</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24591152</guid></item></channel></rss>