<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: bluesign</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=bluesign</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 17:13:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=bluesign" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "John Deere owners will get the right to repair equipment under FTC settlement"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Doesn't Goomba fallacy require at least one opinion should be minority?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 11:04:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843939</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843939</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843939</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "Many Let's Encrypt renewals had errors today"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What you want is warning when certificate expiry in next 7 days, then everyone would update before the warning.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:46:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48596365</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48596365</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48596365</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "Magnifica Humanitas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah but my point is sometimes suboptimal parts can give better overall results. ( Considering also bad actors )</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 09:48:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277386</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "Magnifica Humanitas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Because there will always be bad actors. You cannot design a system on all actors' full cooperation.<p>Ofc they share the blame, but it is not solving the problem.<p>You can say for example: loan sharks are bad for society; so government gives anyone 0 percent credit. You just removed one problem, created another.<p>Just and sustaining system with individual morality is destined to fail. Only option is social regulation. Which is at government level.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 15:48:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268224</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268224</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268224</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "Magnifica Humanitas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah but this is a system problem; if we had this utopic system from the beginning we would not even have AI probably.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 15:38:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268113</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268113</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268113</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "Magnifica Humanitas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This was not my point at all. Maybe I could explained better, but main criticism I have is: you can bundle together objectives ( which are inherently good ) and create an utopia. But those cannot always be achievable.<p>Everything in life in trade-offs. Simple example is speed/quality/cost. I can tell easily:<p>- services should be cheap
- services should be fast
- services should be high quality<p>Now I created an utopia. Obviously this is amazing to listener. They agree. But is it achievable?<p>It is not saying greed is good or might makes right. But system means you need to construct from this ideals best outcome ( which comes at some trade offs)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 15:21:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267924</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267924</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267924</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "Magnifica Humanitas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The thing is why that this feels so good future is; it is a system with no constraints. A bit like Star Trek universe in Roddenberry's imagination. This kind of utopia can only be achieved with all honest actors, but in reality systems are usually designed around bad actors.<p>Even with all morally good actors locally, there is no guarantees for external forces. Thinking it hypothetically, even with global coordination ( all good actors ) there is not a proven path that would lead us to better place from any starting point from past.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 12:58:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266298</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266298</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266298</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "Microsoft open sources DOS 1.00 on 45th anniversary"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I started with c64 but stuck there with basic ( extension port was broken unfortunately could not dive into assembly there )<p>Then I got from someone an old 286, ( hdd was not working ) spent most of my time on "debug" command. Then I got a book for x86 assembly and DOS (interrupts etc). ( Which was kind of hard on non-english speaking country ) I still somehow recall some pages from memory :)<p>Dived into cracking/cheats, made even money on password recovery. How long those x86 knowledge carried me was unbelievable when I look back.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:21:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47959710</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47959710</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47959710</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "I failed to recreate the 1996 Space Jam website with Claude"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Copyright itself is a complex subject, when you apply it to code it gets more complex.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 14:40:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46192736</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46192736</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46192736</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "I didn't reverse-engineer the protocol for my blood pressure monitor in 24 hours"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>ah sorry, when I was debugging I changed the endianness.<p><pre><code>  0x9B530150 -> 0x5001539B ->
  01(year_1) 010000(flags) 00(hour_2) 000001(minute) 01010(day) 011(hour_1) 1001(year_2) 1011(month)
  month 1011 -> 11
  year  01 1001 -> 25
  day = 01010 -> 10
  hour = 011 00 -> 12
  minute = 000001 -> 1


 with no endianness change should be: 

 1001(year_2) 1011(month) 01010(day) 01100(hour) 000001(minute) 01(year_1) 010000(flags)

 with your data:

 1001(year_2) 1011(month) 01010(day) 01011 (hour) 000011(minute) 01(year_1) 010000(flags)
 
 16+9=25       11            10        11              3</code></pre></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 21:04:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45906657</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45906657</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45906657</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "I didn't reverse-engineer the protocol for my blood pressure monitor in 24 hours"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think this is the format, some parts are split ( maybe some obfuscation attempt )<p>0-4 month
4-7 year
8-10 hour
11-15 day
22-23 hour
24-29 flags
30-31 year</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:47:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45903211</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45903211</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45903211</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "iOS 26.2 to allow third-party app stores in Japan ahead of regulatory deadline"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Isn't this same as Fortnite windows situation?; windows allows exe but Epic still forces the store.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 18:14:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45825989</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45825989</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45825989</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "You can't cURL a Border"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it is more for overstays. Years ago when I asked about my stayed days ( I was traveling a lot ) , border guard took passport and tried to count then gave up</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45815127</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45815127</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45815127</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "You can't cURL a Border"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Illegally = like smoking weed in Amsterdam<p>Except few countries, all EU countries tolerate this</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 11:15:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45809686</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45809686</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45809686</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "Google blocks Android hack that let Pixel users enable VoLTE anywhere"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> From my point of view, the issue would be if the same phone worked with the same technology over the same mobile network when connected via a carrier A but the same phone on the same network refused to work with the same technology when connected via a carrier B.<p>But thats the whole point of carrier profiles ( If I didn't understand wrong. )<p>Eventually it is the carrier who decides what you can do. ( this can also may be related to deals they made with manufacturers )<p>I think in this case, it is just missing carrier profile. ( which is like a config file )</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 11:37:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45557423</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45557423</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45557423</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "Google blocks Android hack that let Pixel users enable VoLTE anywhere"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it depends; speculating but probably volte is a very complicated spec with many optional enhancements ( think ssl with cipher types )<p>So carrier can choose to whitelist/blacklist phones depending on extensions available</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 08:27:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45556432</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45556432</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45556432</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "We should have the ability to run any code we want on hardware we own"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah but those times were easy. Now drivers are binary blobs and firmwares basically.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 22:11:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45097061</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45097061</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45097061</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "We should have the ability to run any code we want on hardware we own"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I meant a bit like: Let's say you have 2 mobile phone operators in your country ( duopoly ) we are ok that for example using SMS for banking interaction ( second factor etc )<p>I think this is a process; and somehow slowly people accepting those levels, and in a society it becomes normal ( to have whatsapp for friend group, to have facebook for family photos etc etc ) and you are being left out eventually if you are outside of those norms.<p>So it is not so different for bank to require something like google provided software.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 17:27:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45094718</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45094718</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45094718</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "We should have the ability to run any code we want on hardware we own"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it is kind of levels:<p>"can't participate in society without a mobile phone"
"can't participate in society without internet" 
"can't participate in society without google"<p>not sure where is the logical correct threshold making it wrong. because we all accept maybe people not participating without internet.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 13:48:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45092669</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45092669</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45092669</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bluesign in "Is it possible to allow sideloading and keep users safe?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That is totally fair.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2025 11:16:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45082303</link><dc:creator>bluesign</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45082303</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45082303</guid></item></channel></rss>