<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: blululu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=blululu</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 01:54:42 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=blululu" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "Rebuilding our Electron meeting-recording engine in Swift"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would be curious if the claude wranglers who asked claude to write this piece could ask claude to get some performance data on this in terms of app size, RAM usage and CPU utilization. As the RAM crunch gears up I would really love to AI enabled software development could convert 500MB websites and 1 GB electron apps into performant pieces of software. Agentic coding is just about as good at writing a UI in SwiftUI as it is at writing in React. So there is maybe hope that the software community can take their productivity gains and put them into performant code. Would be interesting to know how much time/effort this project cost and what is the raw benefit to the end user in terms of speed and footprint.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:04:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49393769</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49393769</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49393769</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "Turns are Better than Radians (2022)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Writing full articles takes time and effort. But the effort is cumulative, so these stub articles are really just the start. Some of the comment you made here would definitely improve the article. You are always welcome to edit and improve Wikipedia. I mean this literally and sincerely, it is one of the few places on the internet where you might benefit from posting.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:45:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49373882</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49373882</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49373882</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "Apple's App Tracking Transparency treated its own apps better than rivals"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fair, but when a 3p app has camera in the name and app description then why does it need to ask permission to use the camera?
*just to be clear I think that the stock camera app not asking for camera permission is fine but skipping permission about location tracking is wrong. Having the same standard should be applied to both 1p and 3p apps feel like a fair way to ensure that good practices are used in 1p apps and good policies are use in the 3p ecosystem</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:04:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49332222</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49332222</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49332222</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "Ultraviolet Bird Photography"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have heard this too but I have never seen it validated. I was hoping this project might take aim at a crow and confirm/deny this hypothesis.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 21:40:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304920</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304920</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304920</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "Controversial creators are benefiting from monetization programs run by Meta"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My country has had totally unregulated media for 250 years. I'm not sure what other historical examples you have to justify your moral panic, and I understand that more authoritarian societies will struggle with such an approach but I assure you that we have been doing just fine in spite of the occasional chaos.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 15:04:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49273524</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49273524</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49273524</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "Ask HN: In your experience, what are sound conventions for e-ink UI development?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you are just trying to get something quick and simple that works for rendering react components then this repo is solid:<p><a href="https://github.com/marcomattes/epaper-components/tree/main" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/marcomattes/epaper-components/tree/main</a><p>The Bigme is a pretty high quality eink display, but some core properties of eink are present here so I’ll offer some generic guidance:<p>The contrast on any epaper display is lower than on a modern lcd/oled display. So you want to avoid or modify ui systems that try to diminish contrast for stylistic reasons. Or more explicitly: maximize the contrast wherever legibility matters.
It is pretty common in pretty much every modern design system for web/mobile to diminish contrast so you may just need to go in and tweak things yourself.<p>Second: you cannot rely on color as an accent. A lot of UI does this (submit buttons). Defining a consistent accent pattern is necessary to replace patterns that rely on color. This can be outlines/borders or inversions.<p>Stylistically I think that sharper content looks better on eink than smoother content, but on a 300 dpi display with 16 grays this is less of a hard point.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 19:06:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49248204</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49248204</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49248204</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "Dithered QR Codes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The approach in the article using dithering is in some sense more elegant and mathematically clever. But the level of visual representation from control nets/SD is really compelling.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 15:55:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232576</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232576</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232576</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences [pdf] (1960)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is an interesting piece and it is kind of an outstanding puzzle, but I feel like it was also indicative of the zeitgeist. The 60s were a more optimistic time for physics. We had succeeded in Quantum Electrodynamics, Quantum Chromodynamics were underway. The standard model was being developed. To say nothing of the radical success of earlier advances applying fundamental insights to industry. We had not yet spent 40 years trying to develop a theory of quantum gravity. Or gotten into the immense computational challenges of solid state physics. We are now sifting through a huge number theories which all describe the universe reasonably well. To a reasonable approximation anything can be modeled mathematically and it can be modeled in multiple ways.  But that doesn't really tell us too much. Plenty of mathematical frameworks could be described as universal function approximators. And an SVM and a Transformer NN can, in principle, both model language to an arbitrary degree of accuracy. One is computationally tractable and achieves good results. But it feels realistic to say that that neither model captures to actual structure of language as it is generated in the human brain. This is all to say that this essay might be reading too much into the success of various mathematical models.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 01:13:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49227451</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49227451</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49227451</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "Ask HN: Are You Preparing for the Singularity"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes. Everyone here is. But given the rapid pace of progress the conversation should deal not simply with where things stand but where things are moving.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 02:57:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49218518</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49218518</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49218518</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "Ask HN: Are You Preparing for the Singularity"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, that is kind of my concern here. Scaling does not show any signs of dropping off. And it would be very hard to simply put a pause on any of this right now both internationally and domestically. So that leads me to wondering what my future looks like and also how I might make whatever future we all share one worth living in. I appreciate the optimism of folks out here that nothing is happening, but that seems quite foolish at this point. It is pretty clear that these machines are thinking and they are getting smarter very rapidly. How we respond to this is the great challenge of our time. Was hoping that someone out here might have a some insight worth sharing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 02:52:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49218496</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49218496</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49218496</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: Are You Preparing for the Singularity]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>At this point it seems pretty clear that we are in the midst of the Singularity right now. Noteworthy unsolved math problems are being solved at an alarming rate. Agent swarms have executed hacks at the level of nation state actors. Depending on the domain, frontier AI models demonstrate intelligence at human levels or above. And capabilities are improving at a rapid rate at every level of the stack with no signs of slowing down. At this point it feels like we are witnessing one of the most significant events in world history. The risks and downsides are obviously catastrophic in nature. Job losses being among the potentially milder issues coming up. What are people doing to prepare for the transformations that are coming?</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49212687">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49212687</a></p>
<p>Points: 9</p>
<p># Comments: 20</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:14:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49212687</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49212687</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49212687</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "Folding Paper Globes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Neat. For folks who are more comfortable with using the terminal than paying for things, I have used this python libraries to make isospheres from 360 photographs:
<a href="https://github.com/Teque5/pydymax" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Teque5/pydymax</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 18:20:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49146943</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49146943</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49146943</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "World First Quantum Safe Election Software"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is basically just a marketing brochure for a voting machine. It is clearly aimed at a nontechnical customer (I.e open source mentioned but not linked, a NIST encryption standard referenced but not explained).
I will just point out that experts generally agree that paper ballots are the most secure and reliable way to hold elections.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 13:59:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49058319</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49058319</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49058319</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "HMD Touch 4G"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ok, this is kinda cool. In case you wanted to read the actual specs:
<a href="https://www.hmd.com/en_in/hmd-touch-4g/specs?sku=1GE001CPG30C1" rel="nofollow">https://www.hmd.com/en_in/hmd-touch-4g/specs?sku=1GE001CPG30...</a>
and
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMD_Touch_4G" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMD_Touch_4G</a>
RTOS Touch on a Unisoc T127... that's cool.
Amazed they can get the price that low.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 03:46:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974131</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974131</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974131</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "What Emily Bender meant by "stochastic parrots""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This all sounds like a lot of backpedaling and “well actually” kind of stuff.<p>“Stochastic parrot got picked up and interpreted by other people as a minimization or an insult. It was not meant that way. Other people might be using it that way but that’s not how I intended it”.<p>Yeah that’s because it was chosen to be an insulting phrase.. Parroting is only ever used as a pejorative phrase. But sure, everyone else mindlessly parroting this line is the problem here.<p>This paper was always lousy, but it has really not aged well. We are living in a world when where an LLM has solved an Erdos problem. In a world where LLMs produce novel results that rival human thinking any conceptual reduction of an LLM is going to start inviting some unpleasant comparisons with human thinking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 16:06:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806601</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806601</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806601</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "California bans 'sell by' labels, hoping to cut food waste"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah. I'd agree. This is a pretty quick and easy law with very few downsides. There is also a "good house keeping" aspect to this. The habit of keeping a house clean and tidy makes it easier to do the bigger and more substantive improvements. I'm a bit surprised that New York Times is reporting on such a small law passed so far away or that there are such negative comments about such laws here, but such is life.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 18:33:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787635</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787635</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787635</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "California bans 'sell by' labels, hoping to cut food waste"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a pretty nothing law when you look into it.<p>All it does is standardize "sell by" labels to be more transparent. The extent of the ban is the explicit phrasing "Sell By" which is itself confusing since the manufacturer has some estimated consumption interval that is tacked onto their actual expiration date. Sell By gives the customer has no idea how much padding they are adding to their estimate and when the thing actually goes bad.<p>All this law really does is it standardizes the labels manufacturers can use to "BEST if Used by" for quality concerns or "USE by" for safety concerns. A lot of manufacturers already do this, so it is a pretty minimal law There are probably more pressing issues in Sacramento, but a small improvement is always welcome.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 16:53:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786859</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786859</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786859</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "The AI backlash is only getting started"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s a fair framing. I like the idea that the two debates could be separated. Personally I find it hard to believe that a super intelligence would not completely disempower humans over any reasonable time frame (50 years), but you are right that there is a chance. There are some optimistic scenarios either way but the odds are indeed long. You can approximate things reasonably well by framing the priority as whether you think P(take off can be stopped) is higher than P(survival post take off).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 04:04:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695021</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695021</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695021</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "The AI backlash is only getting started"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This could be true, but I think it amounts to wishful thinking. The human empowerment phase of AI is transitory and brief. Once you get into RSI and AGI the human is increasingly left out and disenfranchised.  The multiplier of your personal effectiveness directly proportional to how much the AI is doing relative to you. Being 2x more effective is great - AI does half the work. 5x, 10x, 100x? When the AI does 99% of the work you maybe start to worry - the bottleneck to 'your' productivity is now you and you are going up against much faster and more powerful entities than yourself. This mindset is rooted in a short term gain that risks a long term loss.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:17:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687671</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687671</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687671</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by blululu in "VPN ban update for UK households as government looks at 'age-gate'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Feel like there ought to be some Sinn Fein backed point to point connection in Belfast that leverages the Good Friday Agreement to get around this.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 15:34:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48609974</link><dc:creator>blululu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48609974</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48609974</guid></item></channel></rss>