I have the opposit viewpoint to the extreme. They shouldn't be allowed to even read that data until they are very clear about what they will or not do with it.

Can they publish it? Can they store it? Can they use the information in it on prediction markets? Etc.

Humans reading texts historically come with little negative consequences, but machines reading and processing texts en masse is more dangerous and should be regulated.

  - can save my life, 
  - is interested in saving my life
  - i have some control over

Yes, they are currently snatching kids of (illegal) immigrant parents and it is horrible, but who else would protect me against lone nuts in a basement, or robor armies of trillionairs?

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295666

Points: 11

# Comments: 7

Is there one that uses html (text, div) and not canvas/bitmap?

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49110547

Points: 176

# Comments: 30

And the occupied place isn't very important to the state, but rather only to a couple of residents.

All others just show that demolitions have started, and there are houses not yet demolished.

0/1.4 billions of people is actually convincing the other way you intended.

Subtitle: I talk about the design of Plan 9 and how I use it

I think the secondary title makes more sense in context of HN

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49108912

Points: 3

# Comments: 1

So what I wrote debunks your assumptions and proves your argument wrong.

This is how conversations normally go.

Factorize big numbers, sort an array, beat stockfish at chess, create a SOTA microkernel OS from English description. All O(1) with lookup table!

It's not how complexity works.

TFA certainly doesn't have the tone what I want from an article that talks about facts, compared to the linked/source article that talks about their own experiments, research and results, in plural first-person.

Here's a nice pdf version of the sourced article 'Pentland, A. (2012) The new science of building great teams' : <https://globalioc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/The-New-Sci...>

That one at least tries to look valuable, e.g. they mention someone implemented their ideas and their team's productivity went up (although we don't know if more than what Hawthorne effect would've caused alone).

OTOH to be a thought-provoking piece it suffices, and the concepts it defines might turn out to be useful when you try to increase the productivity of your teams.

but also here's the archive link: <https://archive.is/oldest/https://medium.com/womenintechnolo...>

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880307

Points: 3

# Comments: 1

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862465

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

  - what are the major characteristics of the program
  - how old is the program

E.g. just this article title on HN: "Java 27: What's New?" doesn't tell you whether Java 27 is old or new. "Java 26.1: What's New?" would.