<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: bnegreve</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=bnegreve</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:58:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=bnegreve" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Germany: Amazon is not allowed to force customers to watch ads on Prime Video"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Blame the consumers.<p>The consumer is not a single person, and until we (the consumers) all coordinate, our individual incentive is to not pay (Classical prisoner dilemma).<p>So "voting with your wallet" doesn't maximize your personal interest.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 06:01:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46309374</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46309374</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46309374</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Training language models to be warm and empathetic makes them less reliable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>  There's no "True" to an LLM, just how probable tokens are given previous context.<p>It may be enough: tool assisted LLMs already know when to use tools such as calculators or question answering systems when hallucinating an answer is likely to impact next token prediction error.<p>So next-token prediction error incentivize them to seek for true answers.<p>That doesn't guaranty anything of course, but if we were only interested in provably correct answers we would be working on theorem provers, not on LLMs</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 10:27:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44886693</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44886693</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44886693</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Finland Bans Smartphones in Schools"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Surely reading/writing are useful skills that most people did not have before school was mandatory.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:26:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43843231</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43843231</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43843231</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Pixel is a unit of length and area"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> in "pixels wide" the word "wide" acts as a square root operator on the area and means "pixels^(-2)"<p>Did you meant "pixels^(1/2)"? I'm not sure what kind of units pixels^(-2) would be.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 13:48:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43772179</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43772179</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43772179</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "418 I’m a teapot"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So many things in the IT world started as non-professional things by non-professional engineers. If you're a professional who lives off one of these things you should be glad that someone wanted to have fun at some point.<p>Let this HTTP code be a reminder of that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 07:57:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41968668</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41968668</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41968668</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded for Machine Learning and Neural Networks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Most disciplines in CS have done that one way or another.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 13:35:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41777218</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41777218</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41777218</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Forage conservation is a neglected nitrous oxide source"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is probably good news, but to be fair land use and GHG emissions are not the same thing, especially given that fertilizers are involved.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2024 08:30:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41755695</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41755695</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41755695</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "FFT-based ocean-wave rendering, implemented in Godot"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is very impressive, and better than anything I've seen before but think  something is bit off with the swell. If I had to explain I would say that high frequency waves don't travel on top of low frequency waves the way they do in the video.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2024 10:41:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41679346</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41679346</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41679346</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Majority of sites and apps use dark patterns in the marketing of subscriptions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> but then set up a website where that button keeps jumping away from your mouse for 20 minutes, while it's showing you uplifting messages why in fact, you should continue with the subscription. Still, only one click<p>Most laws can be misinterpreted, it doesn't necessarily mean they are useless.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:44:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40935278</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40935278</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40935278</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Wireless power transfer system achieves 270-kilowatt charge"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> over an 4.75-inch gap</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:49:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40750227</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40750227</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40750227</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Group chats rule the world"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> every group chat has a n-1 group containing everyone except that annoying member.  And if you think your chat doesn’t have such a group, oh boy, do I have some bad news for you.<p>There are more like 2^n - 1 subgroups, i.e. as many subgroups as the there can be. If you think you're safe because you're already part of one subgroup that complain about the people not included in this particular subgroup, I also  have some bad news for you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 19:12:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40673400</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40673400</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40673400</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Remember When You Named Your Girlfriend as a Beneficiary? He Didn't Either"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't know. If the case is not discussed in court, we will never know. This is why we should not blindly follow a will <i>out of respect of the dead person</i>, because there may be evidence this is just a mistake.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:49:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40623798</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40623798</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40623798</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Remember When You Named Your Girlfriend as a Beneficiary? He Didn't Either"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> In respect for the dead person, we absolutely have to carry out their will.<p>We trust judges when they decide to send people to prison for decades, so I don't see why we shouldn't trust them if  they decide that this will is probably a mistake.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:17:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40623667</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40623667</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40623667</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "The danger of the mediocre success when testing startup hypotheses (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree and I don't think it is specific to the world of entrepreneurs and/or social science experiments. If your target variable depends on a large number of correlated variables you are very unlikely to formulate the correct hypothesis by accident. This is why you need intuition or good judgement in science, just as much as in every thing else.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 15:38:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40344529</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40344529</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40344529</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "European Space Agency to measure Earth at millimeter scale"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>- <i>The satellite will accomplish this [precision] by having the usual main Earth-measuring techniques co-located on board [satelite navigation, interferometry, laser ..] When used together, the ESA expects to be able to correct for biases inherent in each technique.</i><p>- <i>An updated International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) will have immediate benefits on satellite-based systems, impacting Galileo-enabled applications in fields like aviation, traffic management, autonomous vehicles, positioning and navigation</i><p>- <i>The space agency added that meteorology, natural hazard prediction, monitoring climate change effects, land management and surveying – as well as the study of gravitational and non-gravitational forces as fields – would also see benefits.</i><p>- ...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:53:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39765218</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39765218</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39765218</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Europe's deepest mine to become giant gravity battery"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Soon we will be hearing of the global flattening.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 05:35:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39298639</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39298639</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39298639</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "There's More Proof That Return to Office Is Pointless"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The title is rather ambiguous: evidence that <i>RTO mandates</i> do not increase firm performance is not evidence that returning to office is useless.<p>> we do not find significant changes in firm performance in terms of profitability and stock market valuation after the RTO mandates.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:42:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39204357</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39204357</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39204357</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "Researchers have found a faster way to do integer linear programming"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Implementing them in large industrial (or open source) code bases in a maintainable way -- and then actually maintaining that code -- is a different skillset, a different set of interestes,<p>You're making a very general point on how algorithm research and software development are two different things, which is of course true. However OP's question is genuine: a lot of research in OR is very practical, and researchers often hack solvers to demonstrate that whatever idea offers a benefit over existing solving techniques. There are no reason to believe that a good new idea like this one couldn't be demonstrated and incorporated into new solvers quickly (especially given the competition).<p>So the quoted sentence is indeed a bit mysterious. I think it just meant to avoid comment such as "if it's so good why isn't it used in cplex?".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 06:28:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39187003</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39187003</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39187003</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "'Couple,' 'Few,' and 'Several'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh, indeed it is mentioned, i overlooked this part.<p>> It even mentions Jupiter's moons later<p>It is not a coincidence, I reused the example to illustrate my point.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2023 08:25:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37723922</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37723922</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37723922</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bnegreve in "'Couple,' 'Few,' and 'Several'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am not a native speaker, but my feeling is that several can also be used to insist on non-uniqueness. E.g. "Most rich families own <i>several</i> cars" or "Jupiter has <i>several</i> moons" (= not one). I'm surprised that it is not mentioned in the article.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2023 05:44:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37723012</link><dc:creator>bnegreve</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37723012</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37723012</guid></item></channel></rss>