<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: bobby_zhu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=bobby_zhu</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 22:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=bobby_zhu" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bobby_zhu in "IBM debuts sub-1 nanometer chip technology"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We've already been through years of "7nm isn't actually 7nm" across different fabs - completely different measurement conventions, none corresponding to real feature sizes. Now sub-1nm? If it is real then at that scale we're probably in the several atom width territory.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 17:32:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689417</link><dc:creator>bobby_zhu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689417</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689417</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bobby_zhu in "Incident CVE-2026-LGTM"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was wondering why the CVE number has LGTM in it, then my AI reminds me it is satire...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 17:25:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689288</link><dc:creator>bobby_zhu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689288</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689288</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: A high-level search agent]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hi HN — we’re building high-level capabilities for AI applications at Gensee: packaged tooling + infra that remove brittle low-level plumbing so teams can focus on their product’s real job.<p>After speaking with many AI developers and experiencing it ourselves, we found that building agents requiring web content is often bottlenecked on the “search” part, as it involves iterations of search, crawl, extract, re-query, and error handling.<p>We package all these search-related low-level details in an efficient and more intelligent way, so AI builders can get back to work on their core agent ideas.<p>What Gensee Search Agent is behind the single API call:<p>- Web searching + crawling + browsing<p>- Built-in error handling + retries/fallbacks<p>- Breadth-first search approach to search in parallel and rule out bad results early on<p>- Goal-aware extraction that returns content closely related to your query and directly usable by downstream tasks<p>Results:<p>- Improved the GAIA benchmark accuracy for Owl (open-source implementation of Manus) by 23%.<p>- Helped a San Diego developer boost his AI agent’s accuracy by 40%.<p>What we’d love feedback on:<p>- Corner cases where your agents struggle or customization needs for your agents<p>- Output formats you want<p>- How you’d like to control search quality vs. cost<p>- Other features you care about (e.g., runtime monitoring, eval harnesses)<p>We’ll stick around in the thread to answer questions and share implementation details. Thanks for taking a look!</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45054707">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45054707</a></p>
<p>Points: 7</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 17:23:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.gensee.ai/tooling.html</link><dc:creator>bobby_zhu</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45054707</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45054707</guid></item></channel></rss>