Yes, how many students get Nobel prizes for the work of their graduate advisor that they didn’t go on to examine independently?

I hate to tell you that perhaps your friend has not been forthcoming. I encourage you to check the 'citations' yourself, and perhaps to do some study on what LLM texts look like.

She also made up at least 1/3 of the citations using her AI.

That is not a works cited section because there are no citations! It’s a list of references - and I wish there had been citations so I could test the author’s claims.

Also, no comment on whether these constitute made-up citations, but (courtesy of an LLM, each confirmed by me):

Silverman (#3): Wrong author. That essay is by Stephanie S. Tolan, written for Hoagies' Gifted Education Page in February 1999.

Dana Winkler & Alan Voight (#4): The paper is real but the authors are named Daniel Winkler and Adam Voight. This doesn’t sound like your friend actually wrote this article…

Dodson (#1): article's actual title is "Emotional Regulation and Rejection Sensitivity," Attention Magazine, October 2016.

Edit: confirmed elsewhere, several of the citations have fundamental errors that make me wonder if the author has ever read them. I encourage you to spend more time reviewing the things you publish

Even the core idea, 'rejection sensitivity' is acknowledged not to be a diagnostic entity: so then how can we make definitive comparisons? Maybe clinical gestalt... but the author is not trained to see and evalaute patients.

This is not a helpful statement unless you can claim what speed human sensors do work at. And it's going to be faster than the latency of $(sensor + server round trip) Hertz, not getting into LLM processing time.

I’ll be trying these models out and may end up switching my subscriptions if this craziness continues

I’ll be trying these models out and may end up switching my subscriptions if this craziness continues

I think you misunderstand me. I think what is proposed to be banned (employers of doctors who are PE firms) should not exist. It is strictly not necessary, and there's an excellent example of the consequences playing out across Massachusetts right now (which explains the bill's introduction by Warren)..

I'm not sure how we decided only lawyers can run law firms but that anybody can operate a hospital...

VC's can still fund companies that are making expensive new products.

Banks (and PE...) can still underwrite loans for these things.

We have many solutions for capex-intensive businesses and have had these for over four hundred years. LBO-type PE is not even fifty years old yet

Arguably, the origin of life is a question for all time -- no way that a VC webpage is going to change whether someone takes that problem on, and it will be commercialized with big-name capitalists instead of 'FutureHouse' should it ever be developed in the lab.