It should be more like 80% with significant review.

Both figures can be arrived to by taking the monthly total and multiplying it by 12.

Comparing anyone at keynotes to Steve is challenging. He really was among the best at presentation.

Getting a better energy efficiency score is one reason (and consumers are motivated on running cost, not just environmental) but presumably these are cheaper to manufacture as well.

I have an American style, EU-compliant freezer than I can set to -26° which I bought for preparing sashimi safely. It rocks! Highly recommend them.

Consumer rights - 14 day cooling off period for online purchases

Sale of goods - 2 year seller liability for defective goods

Right to repair - likely doesn’t need explanation, require manufacturers to offer repairs and replacement parts

Unfair commercial practices - prevent misleading or deceptive advertising

Unfair contract terms directive - prevents disproportionately one-sided provisions in T&Cs (think Disney giving themselves legal immunity for a free Disney+ trial)

The EU’s problem seems to be in communicating its benefits to its citizens.

Lust and control are perhaps the two worst reasons to have a relationship.

Input tokens map to output tokens. The illusion of comprehension is a byproduct.

"...found that “other global powers’ robust progress in AI is challenging US economic competitiveness" - other countries having a slice of the pie is preventing the US having the whole pie!

"...secondary concern is the risk that powerful AI models may be misused to carry out cyberattacks" - yes, those powerful open-source AI models like ChatGPT... oh wait.

It's a shame because it takes away the choice of either seeing the real product, or imagining it - I'm left with this shitty generated impression of what the food won't look like.

The work can be done in future to migrate to using ConcurrentHashMap when the feature to add multithreading support is added. There's no sense to add groundwork for unplanned, unimplemented features - that is premature optimisation in a nutshell.

When wool gets warm it expands, which cools you slightly. It seems to have a much better range of temperatures you can be comfortable in.

Synthetic jumpers and sweaters get stuffy quickly and after a few washes can end up itchy.

And no, good cable knits from non designer brands go for $100-$200 and will last many, many years.

It's notably lacking newer models (4.5 Opus, 4.6 Sonnet) and models from Gemini.

LLMs appear to naturally progress in short leaps followed by longer plateaus, as breakthroughs are developed such as chain-of-thought, mixture-of-experts, sub-agents, etc.

A less rigid development branch allows feature branches to be smaller and easier to merge, and keeps developers working against more recent code.

A more locked-down, PR-only main branch enables proper testing before merging, and ensures that the feature and release branches stemming from it start in a cleaner state.

I've worked with both approaches and I'm firmly in the camp of keeping main stable, with a looser shared branch for the team to iterate on.

Devil's advocate, but it can't if it's in Starbucks ;)

There's far cheaper workstations out there than Macbooks, especially if you're running Linux on them.