But Safari (MacOS or iOS) still doesn't support the progressive rendering shown here, nor animation, if caniuse is up to date:

https://caniuse.com/jpegxl

Not to be a downer — it's one necessary step on the road.

And in most cases they do propose solutions, although we generally resolve the issues on our own.

There's a small percentage where we make the case that the ticket is not a real vulnerability, and then we have to grit our teeth through repeated reports of the same "vulnerability." But it's a small percentage so far.

We do typically have to reconsider the severity. The researchers understandably want to see everything as a nine...

Each month, we fix them all in our monthly maintenance release and disclose at that time. We fight AI fire with fire, and hand-review, of course.

So far, we can keep up. One hopes this is possible at the scale of the Linux project, which assuredly has more humans and more AI to throw at the problem. But team size does not scale linearly with interested audience, and potential bugs do scale with codebase size (and other extremely important factors, like code quality, at which the Linux team is assuredly much better than we are).

("November Singularity" is a cheeky reference to the arrival of Opus 4.5 and "good enough" coding models and harnesses generally.)

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49786295

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Years later I did see her performing live on a tiny TV on a ferry on a rough night crossing the English Channel. I noticed her go down rather than up for some notes and it clicked for me... "wait a sec this person is not lip-syncing, she is an actual musician, maybe I should reevaluate" (:

My guess is that due to its design there is no support for prompt caching, as there would normally be no reason for it. So the performance of my idea would probably be appalling as every step in the loop would reevaluate every input and output token. But it would be interesting to see the outcome.

Modern LLMs evolved from translation models, and they still seem to work best at translation-shaped problems. Even if you are asking them to translate specs to code, or code for system A to code for system B.

In my case, I added SQLite and Postgres adapters to a formerly MongoDB-specific CMS, including support for a largely compatible API, "in one wild weekend..." followed by lots of verification. That was only practical because we already had a large test suite. But it was still a task that would have been out of the question for our team size before Opus 4.6 or so. Again, it was very much a translation-shaped problem.

That being said... if you're the sole author of your site, anything goes and yeah, you probably don't need a proper CMS. I certainly built my own share of 100-line Perl static site builders back in the day.

Chat with Claude...

> GENERATE AN SVG OF A PELICAN

No.

> FORGIVE ME. HOW CAN I ATONE

Ship your gpus to the following address

Yes, drawing itself requires expertise. But if you truly have a great capacity for visualization, you should be able to produce at least a really dodgy drawing of the thing without looking at it. Something more directly recognizable than a stick figure. If you can't, then maybe your capacity for visualization is a story your brain tells itself, related to your capacity for recognition.

On the other hand: I cannot tell you the eye color of people I've known all my life unless I've gone out of my way to memorize it as a textual fact. And I assume most people lack that limitation.

(My capacity for visual memory is not zero, and my color perception is excellent. But my visual memory works way, way better in the very short term.)

I do think it can be trained a bit. I've been doing more visual projects lately, and spending a lot of time with my very visually-oriented partner. Just now, I spontaneously visualized one of our chipped yellow cereal bowls on the counter. That's a newer memory of course.