<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: bradley13</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=bradley13</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 07:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=bradley13" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "How much of F-Droid is LLM generated?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's an emotional problem. I love writing code to solve intricate problems. But knowing that a faster, and maybe better LLM solution is just a prompt away? Somehow that takes the joy out of it. Why spend hours, when you can get an equivalent result in minutes?<p>I will be curious to see how I feel about AdventOfCode this year...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:34:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49710969</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49710969</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49710969</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "No constitutional right to clean water, federal court finds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Correct. You may demand clean water from your local government, in return for taxes, but it isn't any sort of basic right. And certainly is not mentioned in the US Constitution.<p>Much like food or medical care: fundamental rights can never depend on the work of other people. Otherwise you can <i>demand</i> that work, which imposes on <i>their</i> rights.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 19:23:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49601967</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49601967</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49601967</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "Cloud in a Bottle: making self-hosting accessible to everyone"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Meh. Maybe I'm a grinch, but I don't see this as easier. I have a little NUC running Ubuntu. Putting services on it is easy: PiHole, OwnCloud, Wireguard, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 07:02:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49584004</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49584004</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49584004</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "It takes 5 cloud services to hear my doorbell"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Our situation isn't quite that extreme, but sometimes "modern" tech is just ridiculous. For home automation, every manufacturer has their own protocol. "Matter" has just confirmed what XKCD has to say: <a href="https://xkcd.com/927/" rel="nofollow">https://xkcd.com/927/</a><p>Add to that: every manufacturer wants to run their own servers and their own cloud service. I don't want my data strewn throughout the internet. For most devices, there is zero reason they couldn't work entirely within the LAN. Plus, we all know that half of those services will die in a few years, forcing us to replace perfectly good devices.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 07:23:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506653</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506653</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506653</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "“I just chose words carefully”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wow, autism in action ;-P<p>Choosing words that carefully takes some serious dedication. Imagine the backtracking required...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 07:12:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506575</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506575</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506575</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "European Commission Revives Push for Encryption Backdoors in ProtectEU Strategy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The European Commission has far too much power, and answers far too little to the populace. In reality, they want to be dictators.<p>If you don't know, the unfortunate way thf EU is structured, the Parliament cannot initiate legislation. They can only vote on whatever the Commission puts in front of them.<p>If the Parliament votes "wrong", the Commission just repackages the idea in a new bill, pulls a couple of dirty tricks, and tried again. They only have to succeed once. See ChatControl for a prime example.<p>So the EU will eventually require backdoors in encryption. It's only a question of how many tries it takes...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 16:49:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49500331</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49500331</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49500331</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "Iceland votes on whether to restart talks on joining EU"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are two main problems with the EU, both political.<p>First, the EU Commission has way too much power, and honestly wants to play dictator. Look at ChatControl: Voted down more than once, but the Commission just repackages and resubmits, with some dirty backdoor tricks, until they get it through. Parliament is <i>not allowed</i> to propose legislation, only the Commission.<p>Second, regulatory hell. The continual avalanche of regulations out of Brussels cannot be overstated. People make fun of the bottle caps, but those are absolutely illustrative of how literally everything is over-regulated. This is one of the main reasons that European industry is struggling.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 13:24:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49489721</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49489721</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49489721</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "Canada will match US tariffs 'dollar for dollar' as trade talks break down"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is the way. If the US imposes tariffs, impose tariffs on US goods.<p>The US administration twists facts to suit their agenda. For example, they often complain about the trade deficit the US has with other countries. However, that deficit often (depends on the country) only exists if you exclude digital goods (Microsoft, Google, Apple, etc.).<p>If the rest of the world were to restrict the import of those digital goods, in the interest of fairness, the tech lobbyists would swarm D.C. in panic.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 12:06:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49398899</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49398899</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49398899</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "Where did the old web go? We followed 657,607 links to find out"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>2009-2014? That's not the old web. Or I'm old. Take your pick.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 20:02:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49291150</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49291150</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49291150</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "I flagged two research papers for fake authors and both were accepted as orals"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The next logical step in "publish or perish". Get rid of p-o-p and this problem will also largely disappear.<p>I know managers and administrators want a simple metric, but there is no simple metric for research.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49120292</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49120292</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49120292</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "LLM Honeypot"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wow, that website is so 1990s.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:52:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49108182</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49108182</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49108182</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "git's –end-of-options Flag"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As with almost any successful system: more and more special features and edge cases get added. Git has become ridiculously complex.<p>I wonder: would it not be better to tell users with those edge cases to fix their problems some other way? To take an example from the article: why does someone have a filename beginning with a dash? Maybe don't do that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 04:48:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49017056</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49017056</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49017056</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "First atmosphere found on Earth-like planet in habitable zone of distant star"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wow. 25km resolution of the exoplanet's surface.<p>Of course, getting the telescope into place, steering it, etc. - that's the hard part.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:56:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949539</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949539</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949539</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "Ghost Font: A font that humans can read but AI cannot"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Humans can read it, but with difficulty. If it becomes important, AI can be taught to read it.<p>So...usefulness?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 10:25:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870642</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870642</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870642</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Requiring companies to state the actual price you will pay? Makes total sense. What I don't understand, is why thus is not already the case.<p>Why do hidden fees not fall under deceptive advertising, which is already actionable?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 06:27:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869338</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869338</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869338</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "How to Write an Email"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Disagree. Way too many modes of communication, which is endlessly irritating. If you want to send me a message at work, email is the common denominator.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 18:53:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850715</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850715</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850715</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Stupid parliamentary trick: Hold the vote on the day before the summer break - ensuring that many people have already returned to their home countries. Then use a sort of "reverse" parliamentary trick: the default is that this legislation is accepted. They needed an absolute majority - not of voting members, but of <i>all</i> members - to reject it.<p>Result: 314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions, 113 absent<p>The EU is well on the way to becoming a totalitarian government.<p>ETA: It is shocking that 276 members of parliament would vote to support this. Are so many so naive? Or being paid off?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 13:39:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845671</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845671</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845671</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "How to Build a Minimal ZFS NAS Without Synology, QNAP, TrueNAS (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just yesterday I was brainstorming with ChatGPT about this. I have an ancient QNAP plus a slightly less ancient NUC running PiHole, Wireguard and other services. Both need replaced, so why not combine them?<p>I don't know much about ZFS, but it sounds like I need to learn. Docker may have conquered the world, but I plan to stay with LXD for services.<p>The one thing I take issue with: an appliance like this runs 24/7. It should be low power and fanless. A processor like the N100 seems like the obvious choice.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 05:24:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827852</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827852</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827852</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "How working with a blind client revealed invisible accessibility gaps"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>WTF? Bicycles on sidewalks? At least where I am, that's illegal, and I'm not moving.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 18:33:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778294</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778294</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778294</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradley13 in "How working with a blind client revealed invisible accessibility gaps"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm a teacher and I've had blind students, so I am aware of the barriers. But: do an honest evaluation of the costs of full, correct accessibility vs. the number of people who benefit. A cold-blooded calculation for a company putting out a project.<p>It honestly is not worth it. Huge costs, and you sell...maybe an additional license or two. So no one does it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 18:27:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778210</link><dc:creator>bradley13</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778210</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778210</guid></item></channel></rss>