<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: bradleyjg</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=bradleyjg</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=bradleyjg" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Decisions that eroded trust in Azure – by a former Azure Core engineer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>CFOs love it because Microsoft does bundle pricing with office. Plus they love to give large credits to bootstrap lock-in.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:20:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624345</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624345</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624345</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Private equity turned vulnerable elderly people into human ATMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No it really isn’t. That’s just the latest in a long line of boogeymen. The prior ones being banned somehow didn’t lead to paradise on earth. California is the world champion and banning boogeymen. How’s that going for them?<p>And it’s not just one party that’s working to make the government incompetent. Both are. One for the reasons you cite, the other because it is beholden to public employees that want more money and less work. Just visit nyc or Chicago to see how that goes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 19:12:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566193</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566193</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566193</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Private equity turned vulnerable elderly people into human ATMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> We can just ban private equity companies from doing this you know.<p>Ideologues love to identify some small group of bad guys that if we only rein in everything will be great.<p>It’s private equity!
It’s health insurance executives!
It’s trial lawyers!
It’s CNN!<p>The actual truth is far worse. It’s 100 million homeowners, it’s 20 million healthcare workers, it’s an entire generation too online, etc.<p>There’s no magic bullets. Propagating the idea that there are is how we end up with garbage legislation and regulations that don’t improve anything.<p>What people need to start respecting and demanding from their government is competence. The ideologues of every stripe need to go sit in a corner for a decade or three while we build back up working institutions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 12:02:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562423</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562423</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562423</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Private equity turned vulnerable elderly people into human ATMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yet daycare costs are also exploding. In both cases it’s not primarily about wages going to the direct care workers—-though steep minimum wage increases are a factor in some jurisdictions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 11:33:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562245</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562245</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562245</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Private equity turned vulnerable elderly people into human ATMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m sure the new owners are scummy, but the fundamental problem isn’t scummy people. There’s lots of markets that are okay-ish notwithstanding scummy people. Even those with natural lock in effects.<p>The fundamental problem is it is at the intersection of two out of the three areas of the economy that have had insane cost growth over the last 30 years—-housing and healthcare (the third is education.) For the first one we know roughly what we need to do but won’t. For the second we don’t even have that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 00:04:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559195</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559195</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559195</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Britain is ejecting hereditary nobles from Parliament after 700 years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s naive to hang on to this fantasy of a small cabal of rich people ruining everything. It’s not at all the case. No one is being tricked. The voters are the problem. Go and talk to them instead of putting them on a pedestal as tricked victims. They are rotten and that’s why they vote the way they do.<p>We have a moral disease that infects tens or hundreds of millions not some tiny number of ultra powerful parasites.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 21:32:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405212</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405212</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405212</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Polymarket gamblers threaten to kill me over Iran missile story"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe they are all in North Korea and beyond any extradition. But police broadly defined don’t even try very hard when it comes to certain crimes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 21:17:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47404996</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47404996</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47404996</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Britain is ejecting hereditary nobles from Parliament after 700 years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Founders were wrong about this one. We have an overly powerful executive because they split up the legislative power too much and it doesn’t act as an effective counterweight.<p>Look around the world and find the countries where the legislature rather than the executive is the most dangerous branch as Hamilton suggested. It’s a very short list.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 09:59:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348524</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348524</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348524</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Britain is ejecting hereditary nobles from Parliament after 700 years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When the logic for bicameralism disappears, you should get rid of the second chamber. Not just find some other random thing to do with it.<p>See, also, US state legislatures post Reynolds v. Sims.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 05:40:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47346923</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47346923</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47346923</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Where things stand with the Department of War"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m not trying to erase anyone’s individual experience, but it isn’t a generational defining event broadly across the U.S. population.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 13:23:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47274621</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47274621</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47274621</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Where things stand with the Department of War"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Iraq<p>Not in same ballpark. There’s no Iraq generation the way there’s a Vietnam one.<p>> Spoiler alert, a bunch of the current ones are going to be seen similarly too.<p>No they won’t. The lack of a draft and mass domestic casualties dramatically changes the picture. Especially on the saliency axis.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 02:05:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47269920</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47269920</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47269920</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Where things stand with the Department of War"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you graduated in 2007, your classmates were born around 1985. Their parents were mostly born in the mid 50s to the mid 60s and came to political consciousness either during the Vietnam War or immediately thereafter. No war since has been even close to as unpopular or frankly as salient. It’s the passing out of cultural relevance of that war that you are noticing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 01:51:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47269818</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47269818</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47269818</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In major case, sure. But every last emergency petition? I don’t think so.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:44:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47091204</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47091204</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47091204</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Kavanaugh clearly isn’t in the same bucket. His votes go either way. I don’t recall seeing a single decision this administration where either Alito or Thomas wrote against a White House position. Not just in case opinions but even in an order. I don’t think we’ve seen a justice act as a stalking horse for the president in this way since Fortas.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:11:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47090758</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47090758</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47090758</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Single vaccine could protect against all coughs, colds and flus"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>All that may well be true. But one doesn’t have to be a leader in the field of genomics to have read decades of articles breathlessly proclaiming medical breakthroughs (in mice) and then not ever seeing them hit the market (in humans.)<p>Or in other words the meat of the critique is not aimed at genomics, but rather in science marketing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:12:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47083201</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47083201</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47083201</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Beginning fully autonomous operations with the 6th-generation Waymo driver"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can. It’s called a secondary offering. The SEC has a whole process.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:39:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47000828</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47000828</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47000828</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Self Driving Car Insurance"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We have contingency fee personal injury lawyers and you have loser pays. Your system works better.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 23:24:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831394</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831394</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831394</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "The next two years of software engineering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The bottom up and top down don’t seem to match.<p>Where is all the new and improved software output we’d expect to see?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 01:53:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46582901</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46582901</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46582901</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Show HN: Wealthfolio 2.0- Open source investment tracker. Now Mobile and Docker"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Neat! Thank you. That’s really the killer feature for this imo.<p>In a year when I consolidated a bunch of accounts, I’ve found essentially no program regardless of off or online that’s able to build a global view.<p>It’s a pretty classic data problem—-heterogeneous data sources, entity resolution, etc. Should be amenable to a ml solution.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2025 16:11:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46024576</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46024576</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46024576</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bradleyjg in "Show HN: Wealthfolio 2.0- Open source investment tracker. Now Mobile and Docker"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If there was a sufficiently good import, something deeply customized for at least the top N banks, I think I’d be ok with that workflow. But even Quicken was disappointing on that front.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 18:10:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46007020</link><dc:creator>bradleyjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46007020</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46007020</guid></item></channel></rss>