<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: brailsafe</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=brailsafe</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 03:38:12 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=brailsafe" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "YouTuber Says Cops Visited Him After He Built a Flock-Style Camera to Track Cops"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>God I hope we (Canada) never drop to such a low standard for civil rights as our southern neighbours.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:24:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50028566</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50028566</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50028566</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "YouTuber Says Cops Visited Him After He Built a Flock-Style Camera to Track Cops"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a minimum of academically average, but no worse.<p>> Applicants must meet minimum academic eligibility and satisfy English language proficiency requirements for entry into the ADAP program.
Academic Eligibility<p>Year 12 HSC (minimum ATAR 50 or equivalent); or other equivalent qualifications such as:<p><pre><code>    AQF Certificate III
    Certificate IV
    Diploma
    Advanced Diploma
    Bachelor or higher degree
    vocational experience
    bridging/preparatory courses  (UPPAP)
    para-professional, and
    other post-secondary qualifications</code></pre></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:18:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50028533</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50028533</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50028533</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "Programming Isn't Special"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The actual appearance is less important than the sentiment towards quality, to me anyway; who is it for? I wouldn't buy a house unless I could buy one that I'm happy to live in and that the builder can be happy for me to live in. It's a statement about intent, design, and care. The fact that it actually looks gnarly may not be important, but when nearly all of the houses built in the last 50 years do look like nobody put any thought into it, I start to wonder who's thinking about anything but putting up arbitrary walls to sell without thinking much about what the process yields. Quality feels foreign, there's always this inkling I have that whatever I buy, at any cost, is going to disappear next year or break or have some obvious oversight that got kicked to the side because a deadline came up. It's the focus on horizontal scalability without having attempted to make it better first.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:45:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50026368</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50026368</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50026368</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "What should we tell our students?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What would you tell a CS student to use an LLM for?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 09:14:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50018027</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50018027</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50018027</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "Programming Isn't Special"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So who do you hire if all you'll see is a wall that <i>is</i> up? The one that seems to care whether it'll <i>stay</i> up after they're gone, or the one who's objective it is to get it up for the price you want to pay?<p>"You've got to make the back of the fence, that nobody will see, just as good looking as the front of the fence. Even though nobody will see it, you will know, and that will show that you're dedicated to making something perfect." — Paul Jobs</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:59:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50017915</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50017915</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50017915</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "ADHD as a circadian rhythm disorder: evidence and implications for chronotherapy (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd love to find myself a situation in which I can work like you describe and have it now be side-eyed by normies. That's exactly how I want to live/work, and I've never really found a place that will let me do it, so I just keep rolling through these completely incompatible arrangements that eventually kick me out.<p>> And timeline urgency / time pressure tends to do well at putting me into deep flow state, whereas it can be hard for me to get into flow state for work otherwise.<p>As long as there's a tangible reason the deadline is urgent, then I feel the same way. If it's just an arbitrary demand then I don't respond like they'd hope. My brain knows when something is truly urgent and when it's not.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:38:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50017734</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50017734</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50017734</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "ADHD as a circadian rhythm disorder: evidence and implications for chronotherapy (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Lol, brilliant. I tried the exact opposite of this and got fired for essentially not being awake at 9am EST while I live in PST</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:31:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50017672</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50017672</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50017672</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "ADHD as a circadian rhythm disorder: evidence and implications for chronotherapy (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Completely agree, and tend towards the same schedule. I don't even mind working in-person with people, but this idea that everyone should just be uniformly aligned to operate on the same hours is alienating and humiliating at times.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:29:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50013321</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50013321</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50013321</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "ADHD as a circadian rhythm disorder: evidence and implications for chronotherapy (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The 30 hour day feeling resonates. If I have no external schedule or I'm just living as I see fit, I end up gravitating to 3am bed, ~12pm wake sorta schedule. The only real problem is that it's functionally incompatible with jobs and many other services, even fully remote</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:23:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50013243</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50013243</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50013243</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "Engineer says Claude Code has made his job "soul-sucking""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Right, that's a balance that I can engage with, but I just have limited enthusiasm for wishing things into existence and then being responsible for them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:00:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000782</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000782</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000782</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "Engineer says Claude Code has made his job "soul-sucking""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Which is perfectly fine, and I find that somewhat gratifying as well, but if the work involved amounted to wishing it into existence, than I may as well take a helicopter to the top of a mountain instead of climbing it. It's not not fun, but it's there's no meaningful process involved, and I'd be cool doing that only once in a while. Granted the processes you describe, and I've also experienced, are horribly bureaucratic and unsatisfying as well, but those do seem like a false dichotomy; either you're involved in the mechanics of the work and have tons of bureaucracy or you're not involved at all and have none. More than likely, process always accumulates to bureaucracy, but there are sweet spots that I hope stick around.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:58:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000767</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000767</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000767</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "Toronto-Based VPN Provider Plans to Quit Canada over Lawful-Access Bill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes I just meant that Signal's operations in Canada may be vulnerable to the bill.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:52:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000718</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000718</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000718</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "Penguin Mail – open-source Rust email client for Linux with AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's not about the pay, it's about the expectations. Turnout time and business outcomes are the expectation. Pay me an amount I'll accept (modest) and I'll give as many shits as I can, unless the expectation is that I'm doing things on a wildly compressed timeline where a checkmark is more important than data leak that might never come up. I care as long as I'm not punished for doing so.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:51:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000713</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000713</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000713</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "State of Devs 2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I lost my job at the beginning of summer and since then, I've applied to maybe 3 jobs. I've had the feeling for years that whichever next job comes along, it'll probably be the last. So far I've been wrong, but now there's this feeling that even if I landed a new one, it's going to just be kowtowing to another super AI pilled narcissistic CTO pushing arbitrary product and arbitrary hot tech to solve it. Even if writing the code wasn't the last thing I was clinging to, the best it would go towards is... just bullshit. That may be burnout speaking, but I've received at least one invitation to apply to something like this, requiring that I be "all in on ai", and I just can't summon the energy to grind through another inane 5 step interview process to basically spend my days making throwaway crap while someone watches how many tokens I'm using. It's hard to reason about what the outcome I'd hope for is, and for now I'd rather just pay from savings to not bother.<p>That said, I have no idea what else to do. Going back to school and attempting a degree program seems like kind of a crapshoot even if I could convince myself I'd succeed. All of that is very depressing, but on the other hand I'm actually quite happy to have spent all summer basically doing whatever the hell I want; wasn't that the promise of AI anyway?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:48:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000688</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000688</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000688</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "State of Devs 2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How is it possible to go zero to commercial pilot in 1.5 years!?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:35:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000623</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000623</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000623</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "Penguin Mail – open-source Rust email client for Linux with AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I'm not saying this email client is not secure (although I'd bet 5$, it is). But it seems beyond silly to assume software is automatically safe just because a new piece of tech can potentially find vulnerabilities. Intent still matters. And the 99% would never have the intent to write secure software.<p>Hard agree, especially the apparent 99% of AI boosters on HN who seem to basically only care about shipping arbitrary products as fast as possible and skipping the whole middle part where someone sweaty person is grinding through the details intimately, all day, and while they should be sleeping.<p>At my last place, it was a battle to convince the narcissistic idiot CTO and even one of our senior engineers (both in age and experience) that it was important to encrypt customer data before it transited through third-party cloud service providers. People don't—and aren't incentivized—to give the slightest shit about quality, security, you name it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:12:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49990187</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49990187</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49990187</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "Toronto-Based VPN Provider Plans to Quit Canada over Lawful-Access Bill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Didn't know Tailscale was Canadian, happy to hear it. Them and Signal are big ones. Signal just because the same bill would threaten their ability to operate in the country.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 02:04:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49987096</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49987096</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49987096</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "Engineer says Claude Code has made his job "soul-sucking""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the primary goal is <i>usually</i> to sell things quickly and at bigger scales, not to make an empath feel something inside for the plight of the users. It's a lucky circumstance to be intimately working on a direct to customer product that you can see tangible gains from and the impact on someone's day. In those lucky positions I've been in where the user hasn't been obscured by business outcomes, part of the implied deal is still that I've found the mechanics of the job somewhat gratifying, otherwise it is indeed hollow in the sense that the middle part where you cut things with a metaphorical chisel goes away or changes sufficiently. It was the goal for many developers to be engaged in that way, not anyone else who didn't like that, and certainly not the product goal, but it was part of why those people did it, and it always created tension with those who exclusively care about numbers and had no technical expertise. If <i>all</i> you do is grind for outcome, then have at it, but I find that only minimally and rarely mentally engaging.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 20:17:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49983484</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49983484</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49983484</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "Engineer says Claude Code has made his job "soul-sucking""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And I have always found that a little hollow, and depressingly capitalist within tech. Outside of tech, people who nearly exclusively value end-results are the same people taking pictures of their food, and the same people who can't sit in silence, or get irritable when a hike hasn't blessed them with a view yet. For me, it's almost always been the journey, and the result is just an ephemeral blip while work continues iteratively.<p>Sure, automating away things that would otherwise just be basically copy/pasted anyway have always been fine, but this is a very different scale.<p>It is interesting how people can differ in terms of disposition though.<p>Edit: I didn't mean to imply that one disposition is better or worse than another objectively, but rather that I subjectively find impatient, superficial, consumption-driven people extremely dull, which I also tend to associate with people who mostly care about the result. Additionally, I believe that this focus on the production of <i>more</i> and <i>faster</i> is a non-trivial contribution to producing things that have no longevity or are otherwise enshittified. The less we're involved in the intimate details of a thing, the less we're inclined to care, and the less it's even acceptable to care about quality.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 04:42:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49974274</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49974274</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49974274</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by brailsafe in "ADHD, autism or complex trauma? [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It was a hard thought to articulate. I didn't mean to say that I don't have trouble controlling my attention, it's just that the overtly visually hyperactive and overstimulating games are not what I gravitate towards, as in they fall into a category of stuff that's just "fake" dopamine (like most Type A work related success) and for me to actually be focused I usually need to literally be in danger or something. Maybe I interpreted your original comment incorrectly though.<p>Most of my interactions with people who don't have ADHD assume it's a sort of scatterbrained constant switching no matter what, and that if I just got a calendar and a to-do list it would fix all my problems. Those people normally can't imagine not being dopamine rewarded by their boring-ass office work or being on time or earning money. I need something that isn't an artificial abtract construct in order to not be bored to the point where I'll lose my job.<p>But I absolutely accept that everyone's somewhere diferent on the spectrum.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 19:51:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49969734</link><dc:creator>brailsafe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49969734</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49969734</guid></item></channel></rss>