I actually like that the RM 1 is plastic, it feels durable and light.

https://om.co/about/

https://om.co/2020/07/30/write-like-a-human/

That does not apply to custom buildouts, like this camear.

"Using mealy, off-season tomatoes is the primary unforgivable sin, but when it comes to BLT crimes, that's just the tip of the iceberg lettuce.

...

Off-season tomatoes are grown in warmer climates, picked when underripe, then treated with ethylene gas (a gas that is naturally produced by plants to trigger ripening in fruits) to produce their red color before they hit supermarket shelves. The result is tomatoes that are as bland as they are ruby-red.

Truly great tomatoes must be fully ripened on the vine, where they'll continue to develop flavor and sweetness. Look for plump tomatoes, with the heft and give of a water balloon. If you have a choice, look for substantial and meaty heirloom varieties with balanced sweetness and acidity, like Cherokee Purple or Brandywine.

Avoid tomatoes that feel light for their size, which means they have more air pockets inside and are typically better for saucing or salads."

"*A BLT is a tomato sandwich, seasoned with bacon.*

It wasn't until I tasted my first great tomato, at the vine-ripe old age of 22, that I finally understood the true nature of the BLT (and, by extension, why I'd never enjoyed tomatoes on my sandwiches or in my salads). Here we go: A BLT is not a well-dressed bacon sandwich. A BLT is a tomato sandwich, seasoned with bacon. From this basic premise, all else follows."

https://www.seriouseats.com/ultimate-blt-sandwich-bacon-lett...

I'd love to try Voygr for fun. Is there a skill defined that I could just swap in Voygr

GGP says don't care about X because it's a social phenomenon, but frequently this position is a form of social identification.

You say: X might deeper than social, implying that social phenomena are not important. Thus agreeing with GP.

[edit: my position is pragmatic: If there's a broad or important phenomenon, your position on it should be individualized to the value of the phenomenon itself, not based upon some theory-of-origin category assignment.]

You are correct if we are talking about knowledge.

However it is bad at hyper-idiosyncratic, gritty style transfer.

I first noticed the issue when asking claude code to draft email responses. The choice of register was off. ("Register in writing refers to the level of formality and tone chosen to suit a specific audience, purpose, and context.")

I decided to talk all my HN comments and rewrite them in various bad LLM prose, and see if I could use DSPy to optimize a prompt using in-context-learning (ICL, I give it 10 examples of my HN comments) and the results were abysmal. RHLF fine-tuned frontier LLMs have a deep seated aversion to the target stylistic distribution of my comments.

I tried fine-tuning qwen3, llama, and gemma models. Instruct models are already so tuned that they could not be tuned. This is using several hunded comments as gold targets and 5 different LLM degradations per gold as the input.

Can it work with beads for tracking the state of everything?

i.e. do I need to buy in to an entire worldview to adopt this, or can I use it piecemeal?

One is that it relentlessly strives thoroughly to complete tasks without asking you to micromanage it.

The second is that it has personality.

The third is that it's artfully constructed so that it feels like it has infinite context.

The above may sound purely circumstantial and frivolous. But together it's the first agent that many people who usually avoid AI simply LOVE.