https://www.youtube.com/@FixOldCameras

Hypothesis: This is because there is not a formula that solves the type of problems you are looking to solve.

Proof by contradiction:

  + if there were a formula, then the problems 
    worth solving would already be solved.
    Simply by applying the formula.

  + But they aren't solved: ergo there is no formula.

  + Pursue a Phd because a Phd is the most 
    important thing for you.
  + Pursue a startup because because a startup is the most important
    thing you can do.
  + distinguish between the attraction of the idea of doing a
    startup/Phd and your attraction to the work of doing a
    startup/Phd.

I have also come to believe that knowing is the weakest form of doing.

So I don't try to keep up.

But of course, you should probably do you. Good luck.

If it makes your clients happy, it's good data.

Business data is for business purposes, not for science purposes.

It is easy to do "dangerous things" in C because the expected contexts benefit from easy access to low level operations without the cognitive and computational overhead that high factors of safety would require.

All design is a matter of tradeoffs and programming language design is a matter of engineering tradeoffs in particular.

Designs capable of launching-the-missiles are entirely appropriate for missile launching systems.

https://squest.com/Products/MidiQuest13/index.html

In particular it might be valuable to be in the habit of learning things that one is bad at doing.

Or not.

If it is useful and you sell it, it will become less useful.

If it is useful and the cost of keeping it online is onerous, perhaps ask for advice here in this thread.

If it isn’t useful, it doesn’t really matter what you do and there’s nothing wrong with taking a willing and informed buyer’s money for something useless.

Good luck.

[edit] I don’t think “wrapping it up” matters much to your readers. People are used to serial creative work dying if for nothing else but Youtube.

Write a wrap up if you want to write a wrap up. It is ok to just move on.

I miss the full page visually.

Intellectually, I don’t miss what typically sits in slots 11-30.

Like the removed |More| link, I only looked that far down the page from extreme boredom.

Thus my advice would be to look at established consultancies.

Expect to be nickel and dimed because that is how consultancies stay in business and you want your consultants to stay in business.

As always make sure you are sufficiently capitalized before going into a business project…in this case sufficiently capitalized to afford consultants who make a profit.

Good luck.

Building based on what people say they might means is bout the same s building blind.

And shipping is often the best feature you can add.

Good luck.

The most important part, however, is not making excuses for not doing so.

Good luck.

How would changes to it comply with regulatory requirements?

Is it as reliable as the existing system?

Those answers are perhaps where the reasons lie.