<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: bsza</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=bsza</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 04:40:28 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=bsza" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "Caveman: Why use many token when few token do trick"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I dont’t see the relevance, the discussion is over whether boilerplate text that occurs intermittently in the output purely for the sake of linguistic correctness/sounding professional is of any benefit. Chain of thought doesn’t look like that to begin with, it’s a contiguous block of text.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 13:51:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649445</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649445</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649445</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "4D Doom"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Then what is it? I'm seeing 4x5 transform matrices in the code, looks 4D enough to me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 22:41:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594424</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594424</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594424</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "The Cognitive Dark Forest"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe, but that's hardly comforting (and definitely not in the spirit of open source) if you're forced to take that decision, knowing it will hurt your project, because the alternative is getting DDoSed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 09:53:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572365</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572365</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572365</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "The Cognitive Dark Forest"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, if you open-source anything these days and it <i>does</i> make it big, you can be prepared for a flood of low-effort slop PRs that you must either review for free or stop accepting external contributions altogether, making it effectively closed-source. You can't choose to ignore the garbage, it <i>will</i> collide with your stuff, unless your stuff is small enough to avoid collisions (in which case no one will see it).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571862</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571862</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571862</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "The Cognitive Dark Forest"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The best analogy I can think of (quite similar to this one) is that the internet is low Earth orbit and AI is the Kessler syndrome. We abandon the place not to hide ourselves, but because it is saturated with garbage, and anything you try to put up there will only result in even more garbage being generated, without any positive effect.<p>The ideal solution would be to remove the garbage, but right now we can't even detect it, let alone figure out a way to get rid of it. Besides, it's a zero sum game, why bother cleaning up when you can just effortlessly pump out more garbage in hopes that some of it will remain in orbit for long enough to benefit you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:33:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569030</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569030</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569030</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've been encrypting my private git repos for a while because I had suspected they were going to do something like this.<p><a href="https://github.com/flolu/git-gcrypt" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/flolu/git-gcrypt</a><p>It's very easy to set up and integrates nicely into git. Obviously only works if you don't need Actions or anything that requires Github to know what's in your repo (duh).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 21:50:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548785</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548785</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548785</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "Rob Pike's 5 Rules of Programming"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s not how many times, it’s what you do about it. DRY doesn’t mean you have to make abstractions for everything. It means you don’t repeat yourself. That is, if two pieces of code are identical, chances are one of them shouldn’t exist. There are a lot of simple ways you might be able to address that, starting from the most obvious one, which is to just literally delete one of them. Abstraction should be about the last tool you reach for, but for most people it’s unfortunately the first.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:13:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47426801</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47426801</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47426801</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "I'm Not Consulting an LLM"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>IME, even when an LLM is right, a few follow-up questions <i>always</i> lead to some baffling cracks in its reasoning that expose it has absolutely no idea what it's talking about. Not just about the subject but basic common sense. I definitely wouldn't call it the "same mental process" a human does. It is an alien intelligence, and exposing a human mind to it won't necessarily lead to the same (or better) outcome as learning from other humans would.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 11:23:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47296467</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47296467</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47296467</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "No right to relicense this project"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That much I understand, but that question only comes up when the similarity is already an established fact, no? If we take the claim that this is a "complete rewrite" at face value, then there should be no reason for the code to have any uncanny similarities with chardet 6 beyond what is expectable from their functionality (which is not copyrightable) being the same, right?<p>So my (perhaps naive) understanding is if none can be found, then the author of chardet 1-6 simply doesn't have a case here, and we don't get to the point of asking "have you been exposed to the code?".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 13:21:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47261285</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47261285</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47261285</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "No right to relicense this project"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry, but that sounds like a witch hunt to me, not modern law. Isn't the burden of proof on the accuser? I.e. the accuser has to prove that "this piece of code right here is a direct refactoring of my code, and here are the <i>trivial</i> and <i>mechanical</i> steps to produce one from the other"? And if they present no such evidence, we can all go home?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 12:51:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47261037</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47261037</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47261037</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "No right to relicense this project"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So by that logic, you're not legally allowed to implement your own character detector and license it as your own if you've ever looked at chardet's source code? I'm confused. I thought copyright laws protect intellectual property as-is, not the impression it leaves on someone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 11:07:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47260245</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47260245</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47260245</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "TikTok will not introduce end-to-end encryption, saying it makes users less safe"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> We know just how risky end-to-end-encrypted platforms can be for children<p>As opposed to doomscrolling and brainrot, which are not risky to expose children to at all. /s<p>If TikTok cared about children in the slightest, they would not exist.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 10:57:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47245788</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47245788</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47245788</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "Don't become an engineering manager"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Alternatively, this is all a psy-op by AI companies to make engineers willing to work harder for less money so they can pretend all that productivity growth is thanks to their stuff.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 15:39:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47234024</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47234024</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47234024</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "British Columbia is permanently adopting daylight time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Compromise between what? Disrupting people's sleep schedules and not disrupting people's sleep schedules?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 08:24:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47229714</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47229714</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47229714</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "Discord cuts ties with identity verification software, Persona"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Have you read my comment?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 18:53:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47141030</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47141030</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47141030</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "Discord cuts ties with identity verification software, Persona"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://www.pcmag.com/news/godot-game-engine-is-drowning-in-vibe-coded-ai-slop-contributions" rel="nofollow">https://www.pcmag.com/news/godot-game-engine-is-drowning-in-...</a><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/01/overrun-with-ai-slop-curl-scraps-bug-bounties-to-ensure-intact-mental-health/" rel="nofollow">https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/01/overrun-with-ai-slo...</a><p><a href="https://www.phoronix.com/news/LLVM-Human-In-The-Loop" rel="nofollow">https://www.phoronix.com/news/LLVM-Human-In-The-Loop</a><p><a href="https://theshamblog.com/an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-me/" rel="nofollow">https://theshamblog.com/an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on...</a><p>Just off the top of my head, I bet a lot of other repos are going through the same.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 17:21:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47139767</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47139767</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47139767</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "Discord cuts ties with identity verification software, Persona"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would have agreed 5 years ago, but not this day and age, when AI is raping open source projects and killing platforms like Stack Overflow.<p>We need a safe space from web crawlers and surveillance, and open forums ain't it. (Neither is Discord, but a sufficiently secure alternative might be.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 16:19:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138961</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138961</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138961</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "I pitched a roller coaster to Disneyland at age 10 in 1978"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They did forget the typo though, the transcript is wrong.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:27:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138372</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138372</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138372</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "FreeCAD"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Your ball looks well parametrized to me, what kind of editing are you missing from it? Unless you want to change the shape of the locking mechanism altogether, which I think would be a chore in any format.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 11:51:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47086853</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47086853</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47086853</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by bsza in "FreeCAD"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Another advantage of OpenSCAD (if you can call it that) is that LLMs seem to be able to work with it pretty well. A few days ago I asked chatgpt to make me a box for storing batteries, and it came out perfect on first try without any modification. It also made an okay-ish looking 3D pelican after some back-and-forth.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:19:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47085601</link><dc:creator>bsza</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47085601</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47085601</guid></item></channel></rss>