<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: buescher</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=buescher</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 13:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=buescher" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "Why are so many young people getting cancer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>True, but “normal schedule” is hiding a bit of subtlety there: the hpv vaccine was recommended for women up to 26 at the time, so the oldest women who got it then would be pushing 50 now.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 19:07:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48450010</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48450010</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48450010</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "New Texas Instruments 5532 chips are not the 5532s we’ve used for decades"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>You're supposed to be able to order "a" 5532 without specifying the supplier<p>This is not true.<p>>because many vendors produce "a" 5532<p>This is true, in the sense of a "5532-type part".  But you will note that all the 5532 variants have different manufacturer's part numbers (prefixes and suffixes) to prevent this confusion.  They don't just do that for branding.<p>>and they're all the same.<p>This is emphatically and trivially not true, and it tells me you haven't done the work of carefully comparing data sheet specs across suppliers.  Try it, you'll learn something.<p>>Different vendors' 5532s are supposed to be able to be treated as the same SKU — literally dumped into co-mingled stock in warehouses — with no ill consequence!<p>That might happen somewhere, but authorized distributors do not do this and volume manufacturers do not do this.  You might have an internal part number with an authorized suppliers list that includes more than one variant of 5532 that has been vetted for production.<p>>And yes, until TI's recent move, that was true of the 5532. All the other vendors' 5532s had matching datasheet specs<p>Again, emphatically and trivially not true.  Take a careful look at the NJM and On Semi data sheets.  Spec by spec.  Do the work and be amazed.<p>>the warehouse they're sourcing from has comingled any TI 5532s into the general 5532 stock<p>Authorized distributors do not do this.  It gets hairy when you're sourcing NOS from grey market dealers for old designs or in severe part crunches like 2020-2022 era, but that's a different story.<p>>no real recourse except to change your entirely supply chain to one that specifically excludes TI<p>This concept is backwards.  You would have an internal part number for 5532-type op amp, and it would have an authorized vendors list that would only include vetted parts.  "Any 5532 but TI" is asking for trouble from someone else.<p>And parts do change or get updated and if you are buying from authorized distributors for production you and your supply chain and quality people will get product change notices.  At that point it's your job (or the component engineer's, if you're fortunate enough to have one) to validate the new version or find a suitable alternate.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:59:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398766</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398766</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398766</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "New Texas Instruments 5532 chips are not the 5532s we’ve used for decades"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, I’m talking about the guy that builds prototypes out of his magic parts box and says “oh, you can still get those” when the last direct substitute was obsoleted in 2008.  Or he’s using the old version of a part like this in a “proven” subcircuit and NOT checking for change notices or other the new data sheets.  That’s what I mean by the “magic parts box”.   Buy new parts for new prototypes and read all the latest data, folks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 20:25:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389492</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389492</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389492</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "New Texas Instruments 5532 chips are not the 5532s we’ve used for decades"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They’re just not really standardized at all, especially semiconductors. Not in the sense you’d expect naively.  Some were a long time ago, and supposedly the old Japanese sc parts were, down to die geometry and process. But otherwise, the part number means “this is like the part with a similar number first made by someone else”, not “this is an exact replacement in every way”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 20:21:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389438</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389438</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389438</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "New Texas Instruments 5532 chips are not the 5532s we’ve used for decades"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It annoys me too but part numbers are not a spec but more of a strong hint.  The attitude of the industry is that it’s up to you to read data sheets carefully and test.  Even for a 2N2222 or whatever.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 20:03:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389210</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389210</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389210</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "New Texas Instruments 5532 chips are not the 5532s we’ve used for decades"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is why you should always order new parts for a new design and never, never trust the old guy with the magic parts box.  Also why learning to read and compare data sheets skeptically is a fundamental skill.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 19:35:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388797</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388797</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388797</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "You can just say it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is a C.S. Lewis quote that is as good as St. Paul and I don’t say that lightly: “There are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere mortal. Nations, cultures, arts, civilizations - these are mortal, and their life is to ours as the life of a gnat. But it is immortals whom we joke with, work with, marry, snub and exploit - immortal horrors or everlasting splendors. This does not mean that we are to be perpetually solemn. We must play. But our merriment must be of that kind (and it is, in fact, the merriest kind) which exists between people who have, from the outset, taken each other seriously - no flippancy, no superiority, no presumption.”<p>Hard, isn’t it? The highest ideals are.<p>The clankers are just very big machine spirits.  Treat them as such.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 02:50:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331996</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331996</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331996</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "Schlitz Is Gone, but First It's Getting One Last Hurrah"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I guess it could be if you left out the bacon… and the rabbit.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 12:03:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256575</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256575</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256575</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "Zenith: a live local-first fixed viewport planetarium"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When I put together my telescope setup I got a manual equatorial thinking I’d add a clock drive and my next telescope would have a go-to mount.  It’s been about 20 years now.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:07:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155518</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155518</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155518</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "Saying Goodbye to one line of APL"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>On-screen tablet/phone keyboards seem perfect for apl to me.<p>There’s an iOS port of J but it’s no longer available on the App Store.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 15:11:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136597</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136597</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136597</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "Computer Hobby Movement in Canada"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I got a VIC-20 when I was about 12?  Jim Butterfield loomed impossibly large over all things Commodore at that time.  One of the first things I typed in on it was his TINYMON, a <1kbyte “monitor” (for some reason resident debuggers were frequently called monitors in early microcomputing) before I had any idea what it was.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 14:59:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136386</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "S-100 Virtual Workbench"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>At some point you have to go from S-100 to original “8-bit” ISA.  There <i>might</i> have been a combo backplane in period.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 23:55:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129298</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129298</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129298</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "The Serial TTL connector we deserve"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How did the skedd connectors work out?  I assume Wuerth redfit? I'm looking at ordering some to try them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 17:27:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085910</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085910</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085910</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "The Serial TTL connector we deserve"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes. For about 98% of embedded, you want the pinout for the TC2030-FTDI-C232HD-DDHSP-0-DTR cable that has DTR and RTS on it for STM32, ESP32, and Arduino-style bootloaders. It's 3.3V only iirc.  Power is delivered by the cable on pin 1 so leave that terminal disconnected if it's an issue.<p>You can "break glass" and get the off the shelf cable delivered overnight (and you can spec it if you need a spec cable) or you can make an adapter for the 6-pin tag-connect cable and the TTL-serial adapter that you have.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 17:25:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085893</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085893</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085893</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "EEVblog: The 555 Timer is 55 years old [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes.  Look at the old national app notes for the lm339 family of comparators.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 16:47:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038391</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038391</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038391</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "Batteries Not Included, or Required, for These Smart Home Sensors"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Piezo harvesting switches and similar (I think there’s a flywheel design out there too) are quite expensive, not terribly reliable or consistent, and require substantial activation force.  Conventional switches and batteries that can last for years in remote push buttons and sensors are extremely inexpensive in volume.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 09:36:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034227</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034227</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034227</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "Batteries Not Included, or Required, for These Smart Home Sensors"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Right, and they were superseded by battery-powered infrared remotes for good reasons.  I would recommend revisiting those reasons before proposing this sort of technology for wireless sensors.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 09:31:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034193</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034193</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034193</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "NetHack 5.0.0"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> My general rule of thumb was to look something up when I came across it.<p>That is good advice.  Nethack “spoilers” are more like being let in on an “in-joke” than being told the solution to a puzzle or the ending of an M. Night Shyamalan movie.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998611</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998611</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998611</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "Moleskine's AI Lord of the Rings collection can only mock"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s about <i>humans</i> presenting something plausibly awful in a deceptive way, and using a machine to be plausible and deceptive.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47921029</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47921029</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47921029</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by buescher in "Moleskine's AI Lord of the Rings collection can only mock"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s exactly what a clanker would say, isn’t it?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:57:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47920987</link><dc:creator>buescher</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47920987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47920987</guid></item></channel></rss>