Looking at your comments, it looks like a bot has been reading articles and leaving easy questions to build karma.

What on earth is this page, project, and thread?

GitHub stars have been proven to be easily purchasable.

Happy to hear the progress and that should be celebrated without the focus on stars.

The question remains, if there are no pure managers, then is this CSM / Sales shipping production code? If yes, then it's indeed scary...

> No pure managers: Every leader at Coinbase must also be a strong and active individual contributor. Managers should be like player-coaches, getting their hands dirty alongside their teams.

Always appreciated nuance.

Makes me think that anything taken too far can be a bad thing. Pity in its raw form is an incredibly empathetic side of our human nature and can be extraordinary.

However, if pity is made a reward system for the people receiving the empathy, it can be used manipulatively. I believe CS Lewis called it "a passion for pity" (I could be wrong).

Sidebar, I'm very curious to see where AI goes. Definitely not on the hype train. More curious than anything. This article was a breath of fresh air.

Which is slang for “getting a chance to plead their case for why it’s going to be so bloody expensive”.

GitHub back in the day was a healthy version of "Move fast and break things". I wonder what's different.

This hit me pretty hard. I hope GitHub finds its way sooner rather than later.

Build the platform, then find out how to make money on it later.

The inverse (not auto closing issues) seems worse.

Perhaps the take away is the “without review” part. But that begs more questions. What would a review system be? We can’t possibly expect it to be human reviewers for all the slop.