<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: c_c_c</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=c_c_c</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 03:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=c_c_c" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "Facebook Has No First Amendment Right to Send Unauthorized Texts, Says Court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes. In the top right of the post there is an expandable menu. One of the choices is save post or save link to post.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:38:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13624970</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13624970</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13624970</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "HN comments are underrated"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, those poor persecuted "whites". With the minorities running the U.S. now, it's very dangerous for us. I narrowly avoided being sent to one of the "whites" concentration camps myself.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:53:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12774000</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12774000</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12774000</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "HN comments are underrated"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is certainly true. The "race of users" isn't being "police[d]". It is just a reflection of the subject matter of HN and a reflection of the tech field in general.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:46:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12773973</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12773973</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12773973</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "HN comments are underrated"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nothing, but it certainly limits perspectives.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:42:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12773968</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12773968</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12773968</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "Hackers say Friday's massive DDoS attacks were just a dry run"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is trolling</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:34:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12771409</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12771409</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12771409</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "Facebook Messenger begins testing end-to-end encryption using Signal Protocol"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You answered your own question. No, serious threats do not use Facebook Messenger. The reason it's limited deploy is technical (for now) not caging. Metadata is more important than content. They will always have the metadata.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2016 01:41:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12059686</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12059686</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12059686</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "DuckDuckGo announces partnership with Yahoo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the implication is for Google to just do search. Nothing else. Not to be niche product with a few users.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 03:46:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12013747</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12013747</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12013747</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "How landlords get kickbacks to lock tenants into big Internet providers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you enjoy Verizon press releases? "Miles ran", "houses passed". Industry doublespeak. NYC residents invested those billions via rate hikes the PUC granted to Verizon!! It was subsidized even though Verizon claims otherwise. And they didn't deliver.<p><a href="http://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doitt/downloads/pdf/verizon-audit.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doitt/downloads/pdf/verizon-audit...</a><p><a href="https://www3.dps.ny.gov/pscweb/WebFileRoom.nsf/Web/B849A020314983A3852575D900530827/%24File/pr09054.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www3.dps.ny.gov/pscweb/WebFileRoom.nsf/Web/B849A0203...</a><p><a href="http://www1.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/415-15/de-blasio-administration-releases-audit-report-verizon-s-citywide-fios-implementation" rel="nofollow">http://www1.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/415-15/de-blasi...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:19:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11990584</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11990584</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11990584</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not going to comment on the efficacy of "used" versus "user" in RMS' argument here. However, your comparison to "Democrap", etc. doesn't seem to fit here very well. The former is a shorthand for his entire argument and technically correct. Facebook "users" are "used" by Facebook. This is their business model. The latter is just simple name calling serving no useful purpose.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:00:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11982105</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11982105</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11982105</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "Microsoft to acquire LinkedIn for $26B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It won't be fixed. If anything it will be worse...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:13:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899093</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899093</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899093</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "Microsoft to acquire LinkedIn for $26B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is the most bizarre thing I've heard. People want Snapchat, Instagram. People have LinkedIn. No one wants it. It's a dinosaur. People using it actively just haven't realized it's dead already.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:08:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899081</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899081</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899081</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "Microsoft to acquire LinkedIn for $26B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What makes you say that? Why do you think this is rogue employee behavior?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:04:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899064</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899064</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899064</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "Microsoft to acquire LinkedIn for $26B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>LinkedIn at 10% of Facebook's cap is super over valued. It's pure spam. Everyone is suggesting Microsoft will improve, add features! It would have been better and cheaper to create from scratch. LinkedIn exists in a space that none of the big player care to enter seriously.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:01:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899049</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899049</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899049</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "Microsoft to acquire LinkedIn for $26B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Facebook is irritating and intrusive. LinkedIn is spam. It's garbage used because legacy and lack of alternative.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:55:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899028</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899028</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11899028</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "Being sued, in East Texas, for using the Google Play Store [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not respected maybe but lolcode is functional, complete, and extensible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 02:22:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11867167</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11867167</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11867167</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "FBI wants access to browser history without a warrant in terrorism, spy cases"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not relevant to your point, but Hoover never retired. He died in office.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 04:41:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11860067</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11860067</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11860067</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "This is the most demonically clever computer security attack I've seen in years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You do realize that Stuxnet required a failure of physical security. Either an agent inserted intentionally via USB or an employee inserted a compromised USB unwillingly. Neither should happen in a secure facility.<p>The paper shows simple yet sophisticated POC. The simplicity is the scary part. BTW, do you think the University of Michigan spends more on research than the NSA, GCHQ, BND, DGSE, 3PLA, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 03:02:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11852096</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11852096</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11852096</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "This is the most demonically clever computer security attack I've seen in years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No. If your job is to secure systems there is zero difference. If other than primary has key, it's not secure. If you can break in, it's not secure. Legal arguments are irrelevant.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 02:38:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11852023</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11852023</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11852023</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "This is the most demonically clever computer security attack I've seen in years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Host OS being compromised is one thing. Hardware compromised? VM won't help you</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 02:19:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11851968</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11851968</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11851968</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by c_c_c in "This is the most demonically clever computer security attack I've seen in years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I really hope you're not involved with securing sensitive systems. This is the nightmare right here. Who cares about hardened a OS when the hardware is compromised in a way that is virtually undetectable. Very few have the resources to verify every item on the board and its purpose. The fact that this is even possible is a problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 02:17:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11851964</link><dc:creator>c_c_c</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11851964</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11851964</guid></item></channel></rss>