<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: cafebeen</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=cafebeen</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 18:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=cafebeen" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Why were Victorian elites so effective?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>True, but not universally, depending on whether they are involved day-to-day management or just acting as a public face to the org.  Of course there's always just being in the right place at the right time.  So I think it's worth looking at the specific decisions, policies, culture, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 23:58:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000372</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000372</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000372</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Why were Victorian elites so effective?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I guess the author doesn't cleanly define "elite", but it does lean heavy on the upper-class, and the depiction of social life seems to suggest that as well.  But I guess during that period the makeup of upper-class shifted a bit from entirely aristocrats / nobility to include others too</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 23:53:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000336</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000336</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000336</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Why were Victorian elites so effective?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One way of thinking about it, the success of the elite (meaning the aristocracy) may be separate from the success of the empire. Most of the work behind the latter was done by the industrial bourgeoisie, engineers, workers, colonized people, etc., so the question is, how big a direct impact did the elite have on the empire? How successful they were individually is a different question.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:03:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49996459</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49996459</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49996459</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Why were Victorian elites so effective?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Seems like an accurate picture of the Victorian elite, but it sounds like they were optimized for rent-seeking from an economy and an empire that others built and worked. That was success "on their own terms," as the article puts it, but not something to emulate.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:41:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49994403</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49994403</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49994403</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[GameToMac]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.gametomac.com">https://www.gametomac.com</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49947238">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49947238</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 19:58:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.gametomac.com</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49947238</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49947238</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder if those are more engaging or more effective, they could look similar if untested.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 13:56:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49844747</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49844747</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49844747</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Why I'm still bearish on LLMs after Navier-Stokes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I personally find it slower to read text without capitalization.  It helps me visually chunk information from different sentences, in the same way that line breaks separate ideas into different paragraphs.  Without it, it’s sort of like a wall of text that I have to read more carefully to parse (although a closer reading perhaps isn’t bad).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:01:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49727189</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49727189</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49727189</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "The Real Luxuries In Life"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree, for at least some listed, though many people blow past the amount of money actually needed.  Money starts as a proxy measure for attaining these things, but it eventually replaces them as the goal, per Goodhart's law.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 20:17:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49580278</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49580278</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49580278</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Vomit: Clean up Claude 5's token output with a separate LLM"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For sure, I find many of the LLM-isms to be useful writing techniques and terms (although there's something uncanny-valley about the repetition and density of them).<p>But what I was more thinking about are truly unique jargon terms / phrases that get generated when deep in a problem.  As an example of both of such a term and the phenomenon itself, Claude calls this "fluent compound coinage."  They usually make sense in the original context, but get confusing when thrown around otherwise.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 04:17:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49383724</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49383724</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49383724</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Vomit: Clean up Claude 5's token output with a separate LLM"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One danger in acclimating to this style of communication style is that we may accidentally use it in your own communication with other people.  If the other person hasn't grokked the dialect, it can make things quite confusing (to say the least).  For example, there is common jargon used by people and there is chat-session-specific jargon created by LLM agents, and I've seen the latter popping up in various meetings, unbeknownst to the speaker.  Some people call it out, but others may simply disconnect from the discussion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 18:45:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49378512</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49378512</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49378512</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Show HN: Saggar, a Mac terminal that keeps sessions and your attention organized"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, and also possible they've gone too heavy on verifiable rewards (RLVR) for agentic coding work, and too light on human feedback (RLHF)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 18:08:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49335196</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49335196</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49335196</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Show HN: I spent 2 years designing a mechanical Magic Keyboard"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thank you, just what I was imagining!  I would prefer a bigger wireless box as well.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 20:00:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49201618</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49201618</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49201618</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Show HN: I spent 2 years designing a mechanical Magic Keyboard"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, agreed.  Beautiful keyboard, but when I heard "magic" I hoped to find a touch ID.  That sensor so useful that even though I use a mechanical keyboard, I keep an apple magic keyboard off to the side of my desk just for the touch ID sensor.<p>What I'd love to have is a standalone touch ID sensor that I could attach anywhere -- mechanical keyboard, side of the monitor, under my desk, etc.  I guess this is bottlenecked by Apple's IP on the device, so I've considered just hacking one together by deconstructing and extracting an Apple keyboard...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:47:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49198273</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49198273</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49198273</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Show HN: Zen Mode – a global focus mode for macOS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a known issue now!  I have have all notifications silenced, so I haven't seen this behavior.  Will reproduce and try look into a fix, thanks</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 02:10:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48942647</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48942647</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48942647</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "How to stop Claude from saying load-bearing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, I had a related experience of reading a book and observing what I thought were claude-isms, only to realize it was written in 2019.  Some of the common tells are actually good writing practices, but I guess they are best in smaller doses.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911637</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911637</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911637</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Show HN: Zen Mode – a global focus mode for macOS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Indeed, if only Apple still made an 11-inch macbook air...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 03:53:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887700</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887700</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887700</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Show HN: Zen Mode – a global focus mode for macOS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree this should be built-in.  Many apps have their own "focus mode", but I wanted something that works uniformly across all apps.  There is a full-screen mode in macOS, but it stretches the widow and context to full width, which doesn't pan out too well in some apps (lots of empty space or lines that are too long to read comfortably).  So this preserves the window width but extends the height when focused, which works well for my daily drivers.  The "fade" is somewhat unusual too, which means everything else is darkened close to black, which I find visually suppressing things and reduces distraction.<p>By the way, repo has an animated demo in case you want to see how it works.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 23:19:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885879</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885879</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885879</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Show HN: Zen Mode – a global focus mode for macOS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Would be great, and it's technically possible to spotlight multiple windows in this setup.  But I wonder about the mechanics of picking the right apps.  One way is to use named sets, e.g. dev=(iTerm2, Safari), each with their own shortcut.  Another is to to focus one window and then use Cmd+Tab as an picker to choose which app to add next.  I guess it depends on whether the arrangement is changing or relatively stable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 22:38:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885589</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885589</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885589</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cafebeen in "Show HN: Zen Mode – a global focus mode for macOS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Author here, I made this macOS tool "Zen Mode" to provide a global focus mode that works across apps.  There are plenty of things approaching this (HazeOver, Stage Manager, built-in full-screen mode, etc.) but nothing quite like I imagined.  The basic idea is to have a shortcut to bring the current window front and center and fade everything else to black like a spotlight, and when you're done, the window returns home, and the lights come back up.  A simple solution with about 250 lines of Hammerspoon Lua, built with Fable, though with many iterations to get the UX right.  Happy to answer any questions or hear any feedback.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 20:53:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884678</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884678</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884678</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: Zen Mode – a global focus mode for macOS]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.com/cabeen/zen-mode">https://github.com/cabeen/zen-mode</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884663">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884663</a></p>
<p>Points: 30</p>
<p># Comments: 12</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 20:52:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/cabeen/zen-mode</link><dc:creator>cafebeen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884663</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884663</guid></item></channel></rss>