That is hard to do for even a small company. How do you balance all that out for critical infrastructure at a much larger scale?

I have all telemetry turned off but when I went and checked this "feature" was enabled by default with no notification it had been added.

They usually have a clause around getting a license to all the content posted on their site and being able to sub-license/modify it/create derivative work.

Doesn't that basically mean once content is posted there. They can do what ever they want with it? What happens in those cases when the creator has given permission(although unknowingly perhaps)?

> The majority of iOS 18’s AI features, however, will be powered entirely on-device, allowing Apple to tout privacy and speed benefits.

How do we prepare the next generation for what is to come? It feels like schools are still stuck in the industrial age. How do we teach them not math and science but the actual act of learning/adapting. Our parents could not predict what the world would look like today, neither can we. How do we educate the next generation on the foundational skills rather than specific skills which they can learn on their own depending on what the situation calls for?

This is an idea I am thinking about, so I would love to hear other opinions and thoughts.

The author seems to be using outrage and dramatic words to get engagement. Based on this article and the views the tweet got, it looks like it is working.

The curious thing is that there is a reply from MKBHD in the thread and the tweet author highlights how MKBHD used a more dramatic title on Youtube and that is the authors gripe.

It it possible that all the only way to get engagement(the author is doing the same thing on his primary social media channel i.e. Twitter and MKBHD on his i.e. Youtube) now a days on your primary social media platform is with dramatic words/titles? Which is what is causing all this friction?

This started more than 30 years ago. The internet as we thinking about it did not exist. Computers were just going around. Most it was physical copies which could not be centralized/shared at scale till the internet came around.

I am just trying to think about what kind of system would account for all the changes that have happened and prevented this while also accounting for the reverse where the real person suddenly had someone trying to steal their identity also accounting for the fact this system has to be valid for the future. Maybe it is a failure of my imagination, but I can only think of ways to do it for the current state of the world, assuming the world never changes.

Maybe people are ok with companies making money from their free work as long as the company does not antagonize the people offering free services just to milk every drop of money from other peoples handwork.

It used to be that forum owners had to beg their users for money to keep the servers going. Which is also not a great situation. But now it seems like it swung completely in the other direction, with users having to beg the forum owners to keep/add things they use.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajeev_Chandrasekhar

https://gs.statcounter.com/vendor-market-share/mobile/united...

It said it could not do say add an image to a ppt/create one. When it clearly could. Chat was was overly simplified and fixed the wrong problem. Randomly changed say Excel sheet with no clear undo after multiple steps Plus how it works is hidden, so not sure if they are using 3.5, 4 or something else. So no idea if that is causing the problem.

MS is putting out a lot of things quickly. But the quality is just not there in my experience. They are doing way too many things too fast to make any one thing good.