This part is nonsense, still. There's no known AI -> AGI path, and superintelligence doesn't mean anything, and AGI is assumed to be (going to be) both malicious and a slave, both for no good reason.

* Undoubtedly sometimes the spark of malevolence develops into more coherent and sophisticated badness, I have to admit, so an old person has had more time to mature into being truly terrible. But this is against the pressure of rationality.

Well sure, we should become less vulnerable, including biologically. But there are better ways to accomplish this than having people killed.

Besides, maybe it's the young people who are the most dogmatic. Studies are inconclusive: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_principle#Rebuttal If we're going to go around killing people for having rigid ideas, perhaps concentrate on the young ones, for statistical reasons.

I don't think it matters, mind you.

No, I cannot endorse this.

Which says that it's a tool for querying and summarization, but not a tool for reading or writing, because it helps you to do something different from those.

(Yes I know, don't cross the streams. I just thought it was a shame for this nice distinction to languish over there when you need it over here.)

I dislike the rigidity-giving ridges, though, those are echoing a distinctive feature of the 2CV but are surely non-functional this time around. The ridges are a lie.

I don't know why this is being downvoted. Does "ginger-colored" sound right to you? It doesn't quite work.