<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ccppurcell</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ccppurcell</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 07:19:14 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ccppurcell" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Pokémon Go Scans Trained the Navigation Tech for Military Drones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Everything you do online publicly is usable in principle. Might as well also be public good. And my understanding is that Pokémon go made use of the camera. The kind of data you add using street complete is like "does this crossing have a traffic light?"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 04:48:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48500041</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48500041</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48500041</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Pokémon Go Scans Trained the Navigation Tech for Military Drones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you are looking for something to channel that energy into, you could help improve open street map using streetcomplete: <a href="https://streetcomplete.app/" rel="nofollow">https://streetcomplete.app/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:25:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48488125</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48488125</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48488125</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Claude Fable 5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hey man, fellow Brit here. The American view on certain aspects of British life is insane. I've lived in not one but two places that have been called Muslim no-go zones in American media. My main memory of living near the east London mosque is an elderly Muslim trying to offer my his seat on the bus (I was on crutches) while two drunk gammons looked on gormlessly.<p>On the other hand, it is quite alarming that I can no longer say I support all non violent protests against the genocide in Palestine because that would include the group Palestine Action. It's amazing that supporting them openly is essentially equivalent to supporting Al Qaeda.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 20:18:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48467091</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48467091</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48467091</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Mathematicians issue warning as AI rapidly gains ground"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well exactly.<p>One way to make money is to create a great product that solves a problem people have and market it effectively. That's a sort of idealised situation, an aspiration, but it's what I would call socially valuable. Another way is to help people who are already rich move their money around so that they become richer, in return for a fraction of the increase in wealth. I personally have no problem with that, everybody has to make a living, but that is not socially valuable. It is debatable how socially valuable pure mathematics research is. But you take a fixed fee and all your best work is public domain.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 18:29:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402690</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402690</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402690</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Mathematicians issue warning as AI rapidly gains ground"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think you've slightly straw manned the lamentation there. Not that I agree with the lamentation, but using your talent to make the rich richer (which is what quants do, they are paid a fixed amount to provide a larger value up the chain), as opposed to advancing human knowledge, is the reason for the lament, not some sort of respectability issue.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 18:50:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388132</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388132</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388132</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "My new obsession: A horse-racing board game of pure luck"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is a memory game yes! But still you can choose what to memorise.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 16:37:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311428</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311428</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311428</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "My new obsession: A horse-racing board game of pure luck"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I find pure luck games really boring. Why not just flip a coin and be done with it.<p>I also find <i>pure</i> skill games boring. I mean like running races. You might as well play "who's tallest?"<p>But I seem to be in a minority</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 06:24:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48305328</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48305328</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48305328</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "I'm Tired of Talking to AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sometimes people will bring up the fact that Plato thought reading and writing were ruining real thought in response to things like this. Or "you won't walk around with a calculator in your pocket"<p>But there are two possibilities in cases like these. Either we will figure out how to leverage the newfangled thing to our advantage (like reading and writing) or we will figure out a way not to need it. How often do you really use the calculator on your phone to do arithmetic? Maybe it's just me but I almost never do. At least where I live, these days I can always split the bill by selecting my items on a screen (and frankly that happens pretty rarely). I know people who use LLMs for it!<p>AI is probably a bit of both. I think managers will one day realise that copy pasting screenshots isn't getting them far. Or if they don't, <i>their</i> managers will realise they're paying someone for nothing and fire them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 15:32:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48295850</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48295850</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48295850</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "The sigmoids won't save you"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well it only works when there is no information at all apart from the past frequency.<p>It's the solution to the tank problem. You know that the enemy number their tanks as they're produced. You capture a tank and know its number, N. What's the best guess about how many tanks the enemy has produced so far? As a pure mathematical model with no other details, the best guess is 2N. Of course in reality you have some ideas about how long it takes to make a tank, how many resources the enemy has etc.<p>Analogously you have information about the way trends develop.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 08:21:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158041</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158041</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158041</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Googlebook"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm a similar build and I could imagine using ai for this purpose but come on. 194cm is like top 1% of human height. It's not a solid business model.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 21:49:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115068</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115068</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115068</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Gmail registration now requires scanning a QR code and sending a text message"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also they make it really difficult to mass delete stuff. I'm basically stuck paying for their storage because I don't really have the skills to self host (but I'm working on it!)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 19:56:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099864</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099864</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099864</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "What British people mean when they say 'sorry'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The I'm sorry (that someone died) is easy to explain as it's obviously connected to the word sorrow. The hardest is "sorry?" (I didn't understand or hear you)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 05:10:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045629</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045629</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045629</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Talking to strangers at the gym"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Someone once came over to tell me I was using a machine wrong and I thanked them, collected my things, and left. Haven't been back to a gym in two years! But to be honest I enjoy body weight exercises and cycling better anyway.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 05:08:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018285</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018285</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018285</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Building a Hamiltonian Path Puzzle"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For a puzzle of this sort I would expect to be able to create multiple path segments and connect them later. I would be able to do this with paper and pencil. For instance on the first puzzle you can deduce the way 2 and 3 must be connected without knowing how to connect 1 and 2.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:03:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47944683</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47944683</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47944683</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "How ChatGPT serves ads"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think your characterisation of this as discovery is a little naive. What you are describing is a part of enshittification and it happens too often to be an accident. Revenue maximisation is always the end goal. Also it's not that the user is willing to pay with attention. There is no alternative. In fact it's the very opposite, more than once now a product has basically been pitched as "pay us to avoid ads" and then once it dominated the market they introduce ads. That's  users trying to choose to pay with money over attention and ultimately being unable to do so.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:20:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47944443</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47944443</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47944443</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Amateur armed with ChatGPT solves an Erdős problem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I will get downvoted for this but I can't help thinking that billions of dollars have gone into chatgpt over a period of years and an LLM can direct all its "attention" (in a metaphorical sense) on one problem. I think if you gave top mathematicians a few million (so a fraction of a percent of chatgpt budget) to solve this problem over four years, they probably would have at least made significant progress. I don't think chatgpt has solved thousands of similar problems (even stretching that across all ham disciplines). Basically my thesis is that universal basic income could have had a similar impact, and also encouraged human flourishing elsewhere.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:05:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47908367</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47908367</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47908367</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So what? If we need unscrupulous people to tell us what other unscrupulous people do, so what?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 20:17:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642930</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642930</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642930</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "The Technocracy Movement of the 1930s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Around the same time, Gödel proved the incompleteness theorems and Turing gave us the halting problem. These and the uncertainty principle tell us not only that the universe is somehow statistical and not mechanical, but that there are certain unknowable facts. That's got to be a major psychological blow.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 18:15:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641698</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641698</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641698</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "The Technocracy Movement of the 1930s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not just that but the 30s was the tail end of a period of reduction and unification in science. If physics and biology (large portions of it) could be reduced to a handful of principles, why not economics and politics. Darwin, Maxwell, Einstein, Hilbert, the Vienna Circle. It must have seemed like science was on track to explain more or less everything.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:40:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637160</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637160</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637160</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ccppurcell in "Copilot edited an ad into my PR"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not a hoax, you can search GitHub prs for this string and find many hits.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 06:17:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570994</link><dc:creator>ccppurcell</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570994</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570994</guid></item></channel></rss>