<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ceedaxp</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ceedaxp</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 14:39:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ceedaxp" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ceedaxp in "Inventing Cyrillic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Most of the extra glyphs are for non-Slavic (Turk languages of Central Asia and Siberia). You see the same (and worse) in Latin Unicode pages — just look at how many variations of vowels 'a', 'i', or 'e' you have, consonants like 'c', 'z', 's'…</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 08:42:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060390</link><dc:creator>ceedaxp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060390</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060390</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ceedaxp in "Zenobia Pay – A mission to build an alternative to high-fee card networks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>US consumers are too conservative in the way they expect payments to work—checks are still in circulation and “swipe & sign” has barely been put to rest (has it?). Any system like this would require adoption by a few diverse and large-scale retail institutions to make it worthwhile for consumers to use. Or else it would be a mere alternative to “PayPal me”…</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 04:54:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44896855</link><dc:creator>ceedaxp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44896855</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44896855</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ceedaxp in "A design system for the federal government"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Having seen a number of different gov websites, I think that gov.uk are the most aesthetically pleasant and UX-focused. I would only say that at times they are excessively verbose, but that is less of a design system fault and more from the <i>"let's protect us from any liabilities and people making totally silly assumptions about what, when, and how we do things"</i> department.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 07:38:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37464124</link><dc:creator>ceedaxp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37464124</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37464124</guid></item></channel></rss>