<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: chaeronanaut</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=chaeronanaut</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 20:14:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=chaeronanaut" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chaeronanaut in "Reasoning models don't always say what they think"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The words that are coming out of the model are generated to optimize for RLHF and closeness to the training data, that's it!<p>This is false, reasoning models are rewarded/punished based on performance at verifiable tasks, not human feedback or next-token prediction.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 18:43:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43573699</link><dc:creator>chaeronanaut</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43573699</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43573699</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chaeronanaut in "Grandmaster-Level Chess Without Search"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>BT2 is old news, we have BT4 now</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 17:08:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39317235</link><dc:creator>chaeronanaut</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39317235</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39317235</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chaeronanaut in "Blowing up my compile times for dubious benefits"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>An excellent explanation of Magic Bitboards can be found here: <a href="https://analog-hors.github.io/site/magic-bitboards/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://analog-hors.github.io/site/magic-bitboards/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:50:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36430243</link><dc:creator>chaeronanaut</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36430243</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36430243</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chaeronanaut in "The case against a C alternative"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>this pretty much summarises my opinion - one nitpick - i assume you meant "<i>omit</i> bounds and other checks", not "emit bounds and other checks" which seems to mean the opposite of what you're intending</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 00:35:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32392822</link><dc:creator>chaeronanaut</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32392822</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32392822</guid></item></channel></rss>