How do you handle duplicate requests to external services? Are you going to run credit cards twice? Send emails twice? If not, how do you know it's working with fidelity?

* Deploy everything * It explodes * Rollback everything * Spend two weeks finding problem in one system and then fix it * Deploy everything * It explodes * Rollback everything * Spend two weeks finding a new problem that was created while you were fixing the last problem * Repeat ad nauseum

Migrating iteratively gives you a foundation to build upon with each component

The only reason these things could be economical in the short term is because theft costs retail companies an insanely high amount of money.

However, this might change if these drones become cheaper to operate and purchase.

I would think there's some crime that would prevent people from using these to the extremes. I am almost certain it's illegal to put an air tag on someone to track their whereabouts and I would also think those laws would apply here.

Sometimes people are resistant to use things that improve their life and have to be convinced to work in their own self interest.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/14/business/grocery-shopping-car...

Why? It's extremely relevant.

> In the 80s you could get a 15-20 year mortgage at 20%

20% was the rate for 30 year mortgage in the 1980s. My source is specifically for 30 year mortgages.

> If your monthly payment today is less than it would be at 20%, it is only because you are expected to be paying for it at least an extra 10 years compared to the past

That's a gross overgeneralization. Interest rates are lower across the board today.

> If your monthly payment today is less than it would be at 20%, it is only because you are expected to be paying for it at least an extra 10 years compared to the past

I never said they weren't but you also haven't provided any evidence that arent.

> And that's before even thinking about how salaries haven't grown anywhere near as quickly as real estate prices

You're literally just repeating your original claim with no new evidence.

Also looking at average price doesn't account for the rising quality of housing. In the 1980s the average home was around 1,700 square feet. Today, it is nearly 2,700.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAGE30US

https://www.newser.com/story/225645/average-size-of-us-homes...

It is a lie by omission.

This interview was about how the data and our feelings about the economy don't match. The crux of their argument is that we're looking at the wrong data and the right data shows the true state of the economy, but the true data exists and doesn't align with our feelings either.

> Well, all that is absolutely true, but sadly it’s even worse than that. What it doesn’t account for is people who have a piece of a job — they work an hour or two here and there, but they want a full-time job. It doesn’t account for that.

The BLS does track that as part of the U-6 unemployment rate which is near a 20 year low. The U-6 unemployment rate counts people that work less than 35 hours per week, but want to work more hours, as unemployed.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/U6RATE

Stability does have an LLM, but it's not provided in a unified framework like Gemini is.

What? Lowering interest rates raises inflation.

> See today's print

Can you link? Not sure what your talking about

Scan the QR code, dude.

Semantics is half of what the legal system is. People spend years in court for what they meant in contract.

> They get rid of the word spy on the camera, amazon gets a fine and this will now this happen hidden under the surface. It's semantics. What's the real solution to hidden cameras that spy on victims undressing?

As I and others keep saying, it's much more than that. The issue wasn't that it said "spy" it's that the camera provides specific descriptions of how to use this camera illegally. I don't understand your need for "the real solution." There is no "real solution" to any human problem. We're never going to prevent this from happening at least once, but we can make iterative changes that make it harder and make it happen less frequently.

The camera description specifically describes how it can be used for illegal purposes.

There's a huge difference between selling "stump remover" and "spouse poison" even if they're the same chemical.

The issue isn't of quality, it's an issue of legality