<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: chis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=chis</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 02:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=chis" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think you really have to squint to call this a disproof lol</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 18:14:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49614353</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49614353</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49614353</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Mushroom hunting with LLMs: what can go wrong?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Certainly it's not possible, yeah.  A better test might be to have the AI report either confirmed good, confirmed toxic, or unknown.  Even an experienced mushroom hunter needs to humbly put many mushrooms into the "unknown" category.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 18:15:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49540203</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49540203</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49540203</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>what are you smoking</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:14:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49512887</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49512887</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49512887</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Sort branches by last commit date"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sometimes I’m amazed anyone is willing to live without a git ui. The graph structure git uses is just such a natural fit for visual processing, plus the default git ux is borderline user-hostile until you master it.<p>What’s also funny is that early in my career I could tell other engineers looked down on me for using a git UI, perhaps assuming I was too stupid to use the terminal. I suspect that this mindset propagates git use to the next generation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:29:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49512380</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49512380</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49512380</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You’re still stuck paying for a 3 year contract for deprecating hardware. And the 256gb model which is still not enough is $230 a month. And it runs models 8 months behind frontier</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 02:37:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49443539</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49443539</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49443539</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Pacing model development in an era of cyber-critical capabilities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is just super unlikely to occur in the near term compared to some of these other risks.  It's not like an instance of fable could just introspect into itself and pull out the weights.  Model weights are stored encrypted and are highly protected, considering that they're targets for corporate and state espionage.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 21:26:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49352952</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49352952</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49352952</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Secondhand book sales are booming. Is it because of AI?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So reading more I guess the judge narrowly ruled that destructive scanning is legal because of the one to one replacement, but didn’t rule on whether or not non-destructive scanning would be legal. It’s still not tested if scanning in that way would count as transformative fair use.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 15:31:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311434</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311434</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311434</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Secondhand book sales are booming. Is it because of AI?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Whatever judge ruled that it was legal to scan and use books if and only if you DESTROY a copy of the book was truly a moron. The law gets bent by judges all the time to be practical and fair, they should have used this opportunity to give a more sane ruling.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:52:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311079</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311079</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311079</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Why does Opus 5 feel worse to work with?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think Fable is the beginning of Anthropic switching to training models as agent-first, tool second. It’s certainly the best model if you want something to work autonomously without supervision and don’t care to read the code. The code and writing is ugly but it can complete huge tasks and fix its own work.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:02:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300614</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300614</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300614</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Why does Opus 5 feel worse to work with?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Have you tried Sol? Just curious. I don’t wanna sound like a shill, just feels like every generation it’s important to reevaluate models and pick the best again.<p>I do find myself returning to 4.6 for casual conversation - asking it to help explain some science/engineering or news to me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 15:46:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300372</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300372</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300372</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Why does Opus 5 feel worse to work with?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Anthropic is lucky that they've built a lot of loyalty over the last year that they can burn through right now.  I see people talking about switching back to Opus 4.8 rather that using 5.6 Sol, which is wild.<p>My current approach is to occasionally use Fable for high-intelligence tasks but use Sol as the translator and clean-upper afterwards, and otherwise just use Sol for everything.  Fable sometimes says the most insane shit, both unreadable and just completely missing the point, and refuses to back down when questioned.  It's mentally exhausting to work with and I can't trust it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 15:21:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299980</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299980</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299980</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Hello, me. It's been a while"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s very difficult to intentionally find time to be bored. It’s sort of the opposite of an activity, and the brain hates it.  One passable option is to take a 20 minute walk with no stimulus beyond the scenery. Journaling regularly. Meditation provides a similar experience but feels like a different lane.<p>For me I do find a similar experience to the OP. It’s easy to feel yourself going a little crazy getting sucked along the current of modern life. Flowing from one activity to the next, looking at one’s phone in the between, never any chance for an extended thought except when laying down for bed. If you don’t break out of this mode it’s easy to let weeks go by without noticing or taking much conscious impulse to shape your day.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 03:07:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294371</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294371</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294371</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You really have to be able to hold both opinions at once about Elon. Yes, Tesla and Spacex are unbelievable companies and perhaps nobody else on earth could have made them happen - so he’s a genius. But also he repeatedly promised autopilot, Tesla Semis, the space data center idiocy, DOGE, one million robotaxis by 2020 - so he’s a shuckster.<p>My current headcanon is that he remains an incredible leader and make-things-happen-er, but also that you should just assume all his announcements are complete bs and ignore them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 02:52:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49281276</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49281276</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49281276</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Managing AI Coding Costs at Scale"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s funny how different everyone’s experience is with this stuff. To me the diminishing returns are more around not going crazy with prototyping or running with xmax thinking all the time. I haven’t found it hard to stay under the usage limit of one $200/mo Claude and one $200/mo Codex subscription.<p>If my company told me yeah we’ve decided you don’t get Fable or Opus 5 because it’s too pricey, you gotta use GLM whatever, I’d be displeased.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 20:46:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49216037</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49216037</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49216037</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Where .env Went Wrong"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://www.pangram.com/blog/third-party-pangram-evals" rel="nofollow">https://www.pangram.com/blog/third-party-pangram-evals</a><p>You can also just try it yourself I guess really what convinced me was how it perfectly agrees with my own judgement.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:30:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49176141</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49176141</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49176141</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Where .env Went Wrong"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This has been pretty well studied.  Pangram is about as good at an expert human with a 98% detection rate and <2% false positive, for flagging AI generated text.<p><a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.15654" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.15654</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 17:07:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49171756</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49171756</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49171756</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Where .env Went Wrong"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>92% of this text is detected as AI.<p>It may be time for Hackernews to integrate a Pangram detector into the UI, similar to what substack is doing :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 16:43:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49171392</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49171392</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49171392</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It might actually be for the best to stress the system in this way.  It's not practical to keep a military based only around "stockpiles" that you're scared to use up.  Modern combat looks like long wars of attrition where two countries compete to see who can burn through more missiles so you need to keep the actual supply chain active.<p>Hopefully they're able to learn lessons from Ukraine as well and pivot towards cheaper missiles and autonomous vehicles</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 11:45:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49167253</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49167253</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49167253</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> AI managed to escape using standard and well documented script kiddie methods.<p>I think truly we don't know enough to say this.  OpenAI says their AI found a 0-day exploit in some proxy software they were using but don't give a ton of details.  On the Huggingface end we know a little more, they say the AI spun up tons of sandboxes and tested different exploits until it found one that worked.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:26:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49038940</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49038940</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49038940</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chis in "DARPA, U.S. Air Force fly AI-controlled F-16"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Absolutely terrifying.  I'm sure they will soon find that AI pilots defeat human ones in dogfights 100% of the time, since they have faster reaction times, can tolerate higher G forces, and can be perfectly RL trained in the flight sims we already have.<p>It's really incredible to me that people aren't protesting in the streets over this stuff.  Just in the last month we have 
* AI that goes rogue and hacks billion-dollar companies 
* AI solving long-standing math problems without any meaningful human help
* AI controlled autonomous drones in Ukraine and F-16s in America
* AI now represents over 50% of GDP growth in America and yearly capex will soon exceed the size of the $1 trillion US military budget<p>Is there any line where the public will become deeply concerned?  I mean it really all reads like a sci-fi plot with a bad ending at the moment.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:39:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49024470</link><dc:creator>chis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49024470</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49024470</guid></item></channel></rss>