<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: chobanilover</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=chobanilover</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 05:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=chobanilover" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by chobanilover in "Show HN: PRQL in PostgreSQL"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When it comes to data stack tooling, organizations aren't always optimizing for a better way to do things as much as minimizing the worst possible scenario.<p>New syntax is nice, but it means that analysts and engineers need to learn something new and are more likely to make mistakes that could bubble up to production. There's always an argument to be made why shiny new tool XYZ is better, but unless it's 100X better, organizations are reluctant to switch from something like  vanilla PostgreSQL that they know works 100% of the time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:20:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39432938</link><dc:creator>chobanilover</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39432938</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39432938</guid></item></channel></rss>