Spain have lower levels of vitamin d than Denmark.

I used to play with omarchy. It is good enough for a lot of use cases. For powerful work I just connect to remote session.

Perfect for planes in economy

I would love that the size of the article is based on the number of upvotes (hardcoded).

* > 500 => take full width or 3. * 500 > 100 => Show it as right now. * > 100 => Just show the title.

This is common when processing PII. Lawyers, doctors our similar should not be using cloud solutions.

Also it's harder to setup and always more expensive than any cloud solution.

The UX pyramid but applied to DX.

It basically states that you should not focus in making something significant enjoyable or convenient if you don't have something that is usable, reliable or remotely functional.

https://www.google.com/search?q=ux+pyramid

The prompt is normally larger than the content generated.

We are moving to a point in time, where we don't care if the PR was written by AI. We care that the author understand what is about, that it tested it and in general, we want the ownership.

With articles is the same. I don't care if it was written by AI, if the content is interesting, and ai make it easier to digest... That's a win win.

The problem is not the presentation. Is the content.

LLM helps me communicate my ideas better.

Thinking in different angles, focus on the main idea, structure in a post series... It constantly challenge my mess.

Opus and I, iterate over 20 times a single blog post.

Until now, ideas were only relevant when the owner was able to communicate then regardless of the impact of the idea.

LLM "democratize"(VC term) sharing ideas, as people with low communication skills can be heard.

One command, and you are running the models even with the rocm drivers without knowing.

If llama provides such UX, they failed terrible at communicating that. Starting with the name. Llama.cpp: that's a cpp library! Ollama is the wrapper. That's the mental model. I don't want to build my own program! I just want to have fun :-P

So this coming from google... it's funny. Welcome, but funny.

I’ve been asking myself the same thing for years. My take:

1. Peter Principle: people get promoted to their level of incompetence.

2. In many companies, it’s the only way to increase salary.

3. Some developers think it gives them more leverage or impact.

But honestly, most of the time it’s simpler: stakeholders want more output, and the best dev gets pushed into leading because there’s no one else.

It’s often less a “promotion” and more a gap the company needs to fill.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763667

Points: 4

# Comments: 2

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701239

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677487

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586631

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502058

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

If I apply my own bias I will call it:

    American companies abuse their dominance my enforcing non documented requirements, making other companies not able to reach their users.

If the project is even split in different parts that you need to understand... already makes the point.